Re: [Sugar-devel] Customized Sugar

2011-11-24 Thread Tony Anderson
Yes, there are four cases: 1. No color means the entry is in the Journal on the schoolserver (default status). 2. Blue means there a copy of the entry stored locally and this entry can be used to resume a task. 3. Red means that a new entry has been created but is not yet in the Journal (i.e.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Error i some activities in debian (possibly telepathy problem)

2011-11-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:20:03PM -0300, Alvar Maciel wrote: Hi to all, I can compile without problems sugar form jhbuild (I'm in the early stage of testing) but wen I run suga, some activities fail. I was looking the logs I think that is a problem with some library of thelepaty what do you

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Usage statistics gathering

2011-11-24 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 08:23:49AM +0500, Sebastian Silva wrote: Hi Sugar Community, /* En castellano más abajo */ I would like to propose this feature for inclusion in the next Sugar release: / To gather usage statistics in separate logs from error logs (up to a storage limit). The

[Sugar-devel] [sugar-toolkit] Add new languages: quz and aym

2011-11-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Signed-off-by: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org --- configure.ac |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 41b7a1f..37b3187 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ AC_SUBST(PYGTK_DEFSDIR) # Setup

[Sugar-devel] [sugar] Add quz and aym to ALL_LINGUAS

2011-11-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Signed-off-by: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org --- configure.ac |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 237b2ad..07d7e7d 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. So I took the 1.75 outside. IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. Someone suggested turning it back on quicker, I tried that (replaced brightness_ramp with

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Gary Martin
Hi Paul, On 24 Nov 2011, at 15:09, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. So I took the 1.75 outside. IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. Someone suggested turning it back on

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. So I took the 1.75 outside. IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. Someone suggested turning it back on quicker, I tried

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the first half of the week. So I took the 1.75 outside. IMHO the auto-off is fine as implemented in os12. Not distracting at all. Someone suggested

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Kevin Gordon
I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and gnome, or just sugar? KG On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Paul Fox p...@laptop.org wrote: bert wrote: On 24.11.2011, at 16:09, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: Today is a sunny day in cold Germany, unlike in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
kevin wrote: I too will test this weekend. Silly q: should I test both sugar and gnome, or just sugar? by all means, try both. it should work on VT console screens, too. paul =- paul fox, p...@laptop.org ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: So I would rather not add that extra step below 0. okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and gary are saying two slightly different things. you're saying that the manual keypresses shouldn't have an

Re: [Sugar-devel] automatic backlight control

2011-11-24 Thread Paul Fox
bert wrote: On 24.11.2011, at 17:23, Paul Fox wrote: bert wrote: So I would rather not add that extra step below 0. okay, i'm fine with that -- i was on the fence. but i think you and gary are saying two slightly different things. you're saying that the manual

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Dextrose] [ANNOUNCE] New Dextrose-3 development release: Alpha-3

2011-11-24 Thread Jerry Vonau
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 03:20 +0530, Anish Mangal wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm pleased to announce another development release in the dextrose-3 series. This is our third alpha and builds upon sugar-0.94.1 and a new dextrose patchset. The targeted release

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Port from PyGTK to PyGI, renaming

2011-11-24 Thread Manuel Quiñones
2011/11/23 Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de: El 22/11/11 22:42, Manuel Quiñones escribió: Was done running the pygi-convert.sh script. Signed-off-by: Manuel Quiñonesma...@laptop.org Looks good, please push to the master branch. Acked-by: Simon Schampijer si...@laptop.org Ok, done.