On 17.12.2011, at 11:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote:
I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would
be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and
review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's
On 13/12/11 21:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 13/12/11 16:47, Daniel Drake wrote:
As we move to adding support for a second UI toolkit (GTK+ 3.x),
the sugar-activity binary used by all activities must become
backend-toolkit-independent. It would be wasteful to have two backend
toolkits loaded
(The iaep@ discussion started on
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.education.sugar.discuss/11943)
Hi all!
== Background ==
The two questions, regarding collaborative/social activity withing the
Sugar community, that the following solution tries to solve:
1. What I need to do to interact with
The sugar-menu C module is going to be replaced by Python code soon and
doesn't even compile anymore (thus aborting the build with an error).
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.com
---
Either this patch or Daniels patch Reimplement Palettes for GTK3 [1]
needs to land in
Can you explain what is your idea about implementation?
Is a web application in the school server? Is a client activity and
software in the server?
Is a social network?
How is resolved the communication if there are not connectivity?
Gonzalo
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Aleksey Lim
Excerpts from Daniel Drake's message of 2011-12-09 22:26:33 +0100:
This patch accompanies a sugar patch titled
sugar-activity: make independent of sugar-toolkit GTK versions
The core Activity-instantiating functionality of main.py has been moved
into the sugar-activity binary and can be
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-12-19 18:53:30 +0100:
One thing I don't like with moving the 'sugar-activity' inside
sugar-toolkit-gtk3 is that we make the sugar-toolkit-gtk3 dependent on
the sugar-toolkit-gtk2 as we use modules from it:
That's inherent to the porting
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 04:12:59PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Can you explain what is your idea about implementation?
If it is about technical implementation (not about the initial
purpose), and about the server side:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Platform_Team/Sugar_Network/Server
About the
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
One thing I don't like with moving the 'sugar-activity' inside
sugar-toolkit-gtk3 is that we make the sugar-toolkit-gtk3 dependent on the
sugar-toolkit-gtk2 as we use modules from it:
import sugar
from
On 19 December 2011 19:34, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Is a social network?
It is exactly what http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network#Summary
says, ie, share various types of content
(http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network/Concept#Resources)
between Network
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.orgwrote:
On 19 December 2011 19:34, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org
wrote:
Is a social network?
It is exactly what http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network#Summary
says, ie, share various types of content
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4246
Sugar Platform:
0.82 - 0.96
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/27787/visual_match-33.xo
Release notes:
33
ENHANCEMENTS:
* New translations
* New graphics at end of game
Sugar Labs Activities
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:49:44PM +, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On 19 December 2011 19:34, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Is a social network?
It is exactly what http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Network#Summary
says, ie, share various types of content
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:19:06PM +, Aleksey Lim wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 09:49:44PM +, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
On 19 December 2011 19:34, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Is a social network?
It is exactly what
14 matches
Mail list logo
