On 28/10/13 12:50, Walter Bender wrote:
I'll look around in OZ
I'm mostly interested in the changelog -- I have a copy of the .zd file
and fs.zip so don't spend time looking for those.
If the changelog isn't available, is there a way to unpack a .zd file
and then compare it with the .lzma f
I followed the instructions at -
http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html#setup%20a%20development%20environment
.
I cloned(git clone) , pulled(./osbuild pull), and then tried running the
shell using -
./osbuild shell.
Here's the output I get-
svineet@svineet-desktop:~/code/sugar-bui
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 09:01:02PM +1300, Tom Parker wrote:
> On 28/10/13 12:50, Walter Bender wrote:
> >I'll look around in OZ
>
> I'm mostly interested in the changelog -- I have a copy of the .zd
> file and fs.zip so don't spend time looking for those.
>
> If the changelog isn't available, is
Hi,
Has someone tried to run multiple instances of the latest sugar-build and
share some activity with the other instance?
I tried to experiment with the same, but I'm not able to detect the
presence of the instance from the other side.
Also, I'm facing problems while creating a clone of turtle-
Just did a git clone
gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org:turtleart/mainline.git and had no
problems.
-walter
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Suraj K S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has someone tried to run multiple instances of the latest sugar-build and
> share some activity with the other instance?
>
> I tried to
Maybe my network, I'll try once again.
On 28 October 2013 19:19, Walter Bender wrote:
> Just did a git clone
> gitori...@git.sugarlabs.org:turtleart/mainline.git and had no
> problems.
>
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Suraj K S
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Has someone tried to run
Last time I tried I couldn't even get the activity icon to display on the
sharing instance.
On 28 October 2013 14:47, Suraj K S wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has someone tried to run multiple instances of the latest sugar-build and
> share some activity with the other instance?
>
> I tried to experiment wit
On 23 October 2013 19:51, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, David Farning
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >> I don't understand what you are asking. Sugar Labs has always had a
> >> policy of working in the open.
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, David Farning
> wrote:
>> I just wanted to bump this line of questions as, it is the critical
>
> I don't speak on behalf of the Association, but I think your positions
> are overstated. As far as I know, t
Try with "./osbuild build" command before run shell.
2013/10/28 Sai Vineet
> I followed the instructions at -
> http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html#setup%20a%20development%20environment
> .
> I cloned(git clone) , pulled(./osbuild pull), and then tried running the
> shell us
You say you did set use_broot to false and then build, but nothing happen?,
You tried to clean and then build?
I don't know what is happening, I send this information to the list to see
if anyone else can help you, in any way you can try:
set in prefs.json use_broot to false
./osbuild clean
./osbu
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, David Farning
>> wrote:
>>> I just wanted to bump this line of questions as, it is the critical
>>
>> I don't speak on behalf of the Associatio
El 28/10/13 04:12, James Cameron escribió:
zdextract in the bios-crypto package will unpack it, giving you a disk
image, which you can then loopback mount as a filesystem and compare
with another filesystem.
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Quozl/Remastering is an example use of
zdextract for add
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:01 PM, David Farning
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Walter Bender
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, David Farning
>>> wrote:
I just wanted to bump this line of questions as, it
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:19 -0400, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
> Sugar Platform:
> 0.96 - 0.100
>
> Download Now:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28804/fototoon-17.xo
Testing this on sugar-build on Debian 7
FotoToon fails to start with this log:
1382997097.687926 ERROR root:
Thanks for testing. I need port it to json.
Gonzalo
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Iain Brown Douglas <
i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 11:19 -0400, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
>
> > Sugar Platform:
> > 0.96 - 0.100
> >
> > Download Now:
> > http://activities.sugar
David wrote:
> The degree of openness and transparency is our fundamental
> disagreement. Best case is that the status quo works, Sugar Labs
> thrives, and I am proven wrong. Worst case is that Sugar adopts to
> the changing environment.
I haven't been able to parse this in a way that gives me con
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:01 PM, David Farning
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Martin Langhoff
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Walter Bender
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:04 PM, David Farning
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:14 PM, David Farning
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Walter Bender
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:01 PM, David Farning
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Martin Langhoff
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Walter Bender
>>>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:14 PM, David Farning
wrote:
> In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
> that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity
> Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with regard
> to Activity Central was to _not
On 29 October 2013 01:14, David Farning wrote:
> As two Data points:
> In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
> that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity
> Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with regard
> to Activity Cent
Hello,
sorry for the delay, somehow gmail marked the whole thread as spam for me.
I see you tried a lot of things so I'd be grateful if you could start from
a clean clone.
git clone https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build.git
cd sugar-build
./osbuild pull
./osbuild build
./osbuild run
Stop at
On 28 October 2013 19:03, Rogelio Mita wrote:
> set in prefs.json use_broot to false
>
Please don't do that unless you know exactly what you are doing. It's
likely it will work only on Fedora 19.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.
Hi,
this thread was also marked as spam by gmail :/ I can think of two
alternatives
* sugar-build, which you already tried. I'm pretty confident we can get it
to work on your system but it might require some back and forward.
* F20 Soas. See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Beta . I'
2013/10/28 Daniel Narvaez
> On 28 October 2013 19:03, Rogelio Mita wrote:
>
>> set in prefs.json use_broot to false
>>
>
> Please don't do that unless you know exactly what you are doing. It's
> likely it will work only on Fedora 19.
>
thanks for the clarification
--
Roger
Activity Central <
I would like to thank everyone who has provided valuable feedback by
participating on this thread.
The three things I am going to takeway from the the thread are:
1. Jame's point about my position about not representing the median.
Due to my history and role in the ecosystem, I have upset some
app
On 29/10/2013, at 11:14 AM, David Farning wrote:
> As two Data points:
> In a private conversation with an Association employee they told me
> that they conciser Activity Central a competitor because Activity
> Central increased deployments expectations. Their strategy with regard
> to Activity Cen
27 matches
Mail list logo
