Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Change button text in intro screen

On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 20:42 -0200, Ignacio - SugarLabs wrote: > I make a patch for this bug: http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2672 > This patch proposes: > * Change "Next" (in name screen) to "Change color" > * Change "Back" (in color screen) to "Change name" > > > I need approbal of team desi

[Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

Hey, I'm trying update my sugar-build! I'm getting this error: * Pulling flake8 Command failed: git fetch fatal: remote error: Repository not found. Retrying (attempt 1) in 1 minute I look at log and the log says: INFO:root:Running command git remote set-url origin git:// github.com/bmcusto

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

Looks like the official github flake8 mirror was taken down :/ I mailed the owner to know if it's intentional... I will let you know. On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > Hey, I'm trying update my sugar-build! > > I'm getting this error: > > * Pulling flake8 > > Command faile

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

Oh ok, I need it :S Saludos. Ignacio Rodríguez 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez > Looks like the official github flake8 mirror was taken down :/ I mailed > the owner to know if it's intentional... I will let you know. > > > On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > >> Hey, I'm trying u

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

As a workaround you can hack modules.js and remove the flake8 entry. On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > Oh ok, I need it :S > > Saludos. > Ignacio Rodríguez > > > 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');>> > >> Looks like the official github flake8 mirror was taken

[Sugar-devel] External devices @ development environment

Hello, I have a problem with external devices (such as a USB). The development environment (setup on Fedora, as described here http://developer.sugarlabs.org/dev-environment.md.html) seems to not recognize when a USB device is connected. I have tracked the problem to Gio.VolumeMonitor (at least I

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

It seems intentional because it was removed from their homepage too. Not sure what's the best fix. Maybe we should just pull these tools from pypi into the sugar-build virtualenv. It's unlikely anyone will want to hack on them anyway. I'd rather avoid maintaining our own mirror and I don't want to

[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Journal time filter (was Re: Fwd: GCI task, Ticket #3026)

The tag seems to be helpful to get designers attention :) On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > Emil's code works well; the question to me is one of design. He > replaced the comboboxes with a slider. I wonder if perhaps a palette > (like the one Gonzalo developed for Fonts) might b

Re: [Sugar-devel] Another sugar tests failure

Great thanks. We seem to be back green again! (except the flakes8 breakage which I'll try to fix later today). On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Yes. The last commit broken " Show feedback in detailview when sugar can't > manage a entry - SL #328" > > A small fix was pushed. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Absolute time in the journal

Are relative times really that much of a problem? It feels like a lot of trouble for just these to me... On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > 2013/12/3 Walter Bender >: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Manuel Quiñones > > > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I think this is a good,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

Thx. I "hacked" (remove flake8) modules.json and now works fine. ¿Flake 8 is dependency for what? Saludos. Ignacio Rodríguez 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez > It seems intentional because it was removed from their homepage too. > > Not sure what's the best fix. Maybe we should just pull these tools

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web-activity: Store API documentation

It might just be matter of enabling docs generation for the python modules in sugar-build module.json. If I remember correctly docker.js is able to deal with python code... On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Ohh, is so nice... > > What should we do to have something similar on p

Re: [Sugar-devel] Web-activity: Store API documentation

Yes, I never got to write the GCI task :( On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Gonzalo Odiard > > > wrote: > > Ohh, is so nice... > > > > What should we do to have something similar on python api? > > > > Gonzalo > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 4

Re: [Sugar-devel] Flake8 error

It's used to check python code style and syntax. So it's development only, not a runtime dep. On Wednesday, 4 December 2013, Ignacio Rodríguez wrote: > Thx. I "hacked" (remove flake8) modules.json and now works fine. > > ¿Flake 8 is dependency for what? > > Saludos. > Ignacio Rodríguez > > > 2013

[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

Unfortunately I don't think there is a way at the moment. But you are making a very good point here, should be trivial to print out the commit in osbuild pull, so that it's available in the log... I'll see if I can get at it or patches welcome of course... Should probably go in _pull_module https:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

Thanks, I'll sniff around that and I'll try to send a patch. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Unfortunately I don't think there is a way at the moment. But you are > making a very good point here, should be trivial to print out the commit in > osbuild pull, so that it's a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 3 December 2013 13:51, Rogelio Mita wrote: > > > 2013/12/3 Daniel Narvaez > >> What do you mean with "emergence of sugar-toolkit-gtk3"? > > > I do not know the story of how this package came, when.., the main > purpose.., not that long ago I'm on this list > It's the python library you use to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 3 December 2013 15:54, Lionel Laské wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > May be I miss something but I don't see any compatibility risk on existing > Web Activity neither need to upgrade the Sugar Web Framework. Right ? > No issue with the current Web activity. Currently sugar-web doesn't need any change

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 3 December 2013 20:08, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > I think we should develop sugar-web looking at the future, which in > the case of GTK is WebKitGTK2. > > That being said, I don't mind a fallback to WebKitGTK1 if WebKitGTK2 > is not available in the toolkit. But I think that we should not make

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > On 3 December 2013 20:08, Manuel Quiñones wrote: > >> I think we should develop sugar-web looking at the future, which in >> the case of GTK is WebKitGTK2. >> >> That being said, I don't mind a fallback to WebKitGTK1 if WebKitGTK2 >> is not

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013/12/4 Gonzalo Odiard > * If there are a way to implement a feature compatible with webkit1 and > webkit2, > with a comparable complexity, is encouraged use it. > About that: using a web-server for both webkit1 and webkit2 is feasible? over the course of thread I read that was a decision to a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 4 December 2013 19:40, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > > > > > Just to clarify, the spirit of this last line is: > > * Do not allow special casing of sugar-web to support _only_ webkit1. > > ? > Do not add code which is necessary for webkit1 support only. For example, do not have two separated getEnv

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 4 December 2013 19:50, Rogelio Mita wrote: > > 2013/12/4 Gonzalo Odiard > >> * If there are a way to implement a feature compatible with webkit1 and >> webkit2, >> with a comparable complexity, is encouraged use it. >> > > About that: > using a web-server for both webkit1 and webkit2 is feasib

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez > This is a good concrete example of what worries me. Assuming the custom > protocol is a slightly better solution (it might not be, it's a bit hard to > evaluate but... for the sake of this dicussion let's assume it is), what do > we do? *I think in a loud voice and I

[Sugar-devel] Web server vs activities protocol (Re: Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1)

On 4 December 2013 19:50, Rogelio Mita wrote > > over the course of thread I read that was a decision to avoid using web > server, please, can you guys deepen this decision more in detail? > I don't think it was ever properly evaluated. We had a very early discussion about it, I don't remember th

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

On 4 December 2013 20:06, Rogelio Mita wrote: > > 2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez > >> This is a good concrete example of what worries me. Assuming the custom >> protocol is a slightly better solution (it might not be, it's a bit hard to >> evaluate but... for the sake of this dicussion let's assume it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] Fix control panel search focus issue - SL #3188 (#168)

Sending by traditional email :) On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > No patch attached, I guess github gets rid of it. > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on > GitHub > . > -- Gonzalo Odiard

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] Fix control panel search focus issue - SL #3188 (#168)

Yes I meant something like that. I can't look deeper into it right now, but give me couple of days and I'll get back to you. On 4 December 2013 20:18, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Sending by traditional email :) > > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Daniel Narvaez > wrote: > >> No patch attach

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar] Fix control panel search focus issue - SL #3188 (#168)

A additional note. With this main_loop patch, I don't know if I did something wrong, but I can't close sugar On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > Yes I meant something like that. > > I can't look deeper into it right now, but give me couple of days and I'll > get back to you.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding compatibility in webactivity to webkit1

2013/12/4 Daniel Narvaez > I see your point of course. Though if we can keep the webkit2 > implementation the best it can be and, at the same time, allow people like > Gonzalo to provide rudimentary support for web activities in deployed/ing > software, maybe it's a good compromise... (Thinking o

[Sugar-devel] Date in the View List of Activities

Hi all, Sorry for the stupid question: In Sugar, in the List view of Activities, we could see: - the icon of the activity, - the name of the activity, - the version of the activity, - and... a date displayed like "xxx ago". What is this date ? I thought it was the last time the activity was used

Re: [Sugar-devel] Date in the View List of Activities

It's the "age" of the activity (today - activity timestamp). I think that not have any function have that info. Maybe we can deleted themand add other field like "summary". Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:38:26 +0100 From: lio...@olpc-france.org To: sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: [Sugar-devel]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Date in the View List of Activities

It is an artificial date to ensure that olpc-update works as efficiently as it can. OLPC_EPOCH="2007-11-02 12:00:00Z" http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/olpc-os-builder/tree/modules/base/preimage.90.core.sh lines 81 and 94 The Sugar list of activities uses a filesystem date for the display. Pe

Re: [Sugar-devel] Date in the View List of Activities

In theory is the installation time: https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/desktop/activitieslist.py#L256 https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/blob/master/src/sugar3/bundle/bundle.py#L72 is os.stat.mtime of the activity directory, then, should be " time of most rece

Re: [Sugar-devel] Date in the View List of Activities

Okay. Cool. Thanks to all for quick answer and pointers. Lionel. 2013/12/4 Gonzalo Odiard > In theory is the installation time: > > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/src/jarabe/desktop/activitieslist.py#L256 > > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/blob/maste