Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Probably [FEATURE] is enough. Will have a Design discussion anyway. Remember the feature wiki page do not mean will be implemented by magic, somebody need take responsibility of do the work. Also, we will not land more features for 0.102, see our schedule [1] Gonzalo [1]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Christian Stroetmann
Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of the webpage Features/Policy that says: If your feature adds UI or changes the current UI

Re: [Sugar-devel] Formal question regarding Feature Policy

2014-03-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Christian Stroetmann stroetm...@ontolab.com wrote: Hi Gonzalo Before any complaints hit the the mailing list I prefer to ask twice. In this case the question is related with the paragraph 'Propose a feature for addition into the release cycle', point 2 of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Need for volunteers in maintaining the activities repos on g.sl.o

2014-03-06 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I read the old content, so that I know what is included. The check has to be done against what? The related documents on Floss Manuals? Or do you have a quick link? The new content is in the Help Activity http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4051 (last version 17.1) Where to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Need for volunteers in maintaining the activities repos on g.sl.o

2014-03-06 Thread Christian Stroetmann
I read the old content, so that I know what is included. The check has to be done against what? The related documents on Floss Manuals? Or do you have a quick link? The new content is in the Help Activity http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addon/4051 (last version 17.1)

[Sugar-devel] Regarding JS collaboration project

2014-03-06 Thread Prasoon Shukla
Hi all My name is Prasoon Shukla. I'll be applying as a student to GSoC 2014. I have been exploring the possible project candidates ( http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Summer_of_Code/2014) and JavaScript collaboration and social help seem like good projects (considering my competance and previous

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding JS collaboration project

2014-03-06 Thread Prasoon Shukla
Thanks a lot Sam. Collab in sugar runs between same activity on different devices. That's what I was thought :) Anyway, I took a look at together.js and wow, it's a really awesome library. So, the thing I talked about writing a node based server - well, they've already done it for their hub!

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding JS collaboration project

2014-03-06 Thread Sam Parkinson
Hi, The thread is 1/2 way down here: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2014-January/thread.html It is called [Sugar-devel] Collaboration support for sugar web activities Sam On Mar 7, 2014 7:21 AM, Prasoon Shukla prasoon92.i...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks a lot Sam. Collab in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Best time format for logging?

2014-03-06 Thread Martin Dluhos
On 28.2.2014 19:57, Walter Bender wrote: It seems time on activity is an oft-requested feature. IMHO, we should maintain those data in the activity instance metadata like we do launch times et al. Should be a fairly straight-forward patch. I second this request. Elapsed activity time is what