Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Gaurav Parida
Hi, Uptill now I have been successful in installing all the activities except etoys(there is some file opeing error in the log) and I can't find the repository named image as specfied in the list of the activities at http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/ I thought that after

Re: [Sugar-devel] Regarding Social Help project

2014-03-13 Thread Prasoon Shukla
I took a look at two of the webservices - Facebook and PutLocker. Now, Facebook provides an access token that can be used to log the user in via third-party clients. As far as I can see, Discourse does not provide such access tokens. The Facebook access token being used is here:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature freeze

2014-03-13 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Manuel QuiƱones ma...@laptop.org wrote: in my humble opinion, I would also like to see the feature freeze delayed. several features are almost done. How long away is almost done? A few days, weeks? While I'm happy to see it delayed I want the delay defined so

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature freeze

2014-03-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Manuel QuiƱones ma...@laptop.org wrote: in my humble opinion, I would also like to see the feature freeze delayed. several features are almost done. How long away is almost done?

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 11 March 2014 02:56, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel, I think that what is behind this request is that there are some deployments (Australia and Uruguay) where a few weeks delay wouldn't make much difference but carrying a bunch of patches downstream for another

Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposing review 0.102 schedule

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 11 March 2014 03:46, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Daniel, I don't want put you in a uncomfortable situation. All of us are pretty loaded. I don't see how modifying the schedule can prejudice you or other in the team. If this change means more work for other, then no deal.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature freeze

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: To the people writing and reviewing is that enough rime to review and land the remaining features? Just fyi I'm unlikely to have time to review major patches. ___ Sugar-devel mailing

[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Pippy-58

2014-03-13 Thread Sugar Labs Activities
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4041 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28911/pippy-58.xo Release notes: 58 BUG FIX: typo in alert callback name Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Sai Vineet
Etoys is not in Python, I think. How will you write tests? Will UI tests work on it? On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Gaurav Parida gparid...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Uptill now I have been successful in installing all the activities except etoys(there is some file opeing error in the log)

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature freeze

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel would you be amicable to stretching it out by a month so we have one more round of dev releases before entering freeze? Sorry for the delay on closing down this issue, I have been busy. I'll try to keep it short so that

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
I don't think so, it's not using gtk. On 13 March 2014 13:22, Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com wrote: Etoys is not in Python, I think. How will you write tests? Will UI tests work on it? On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Gaurav Parida gparid...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Uptill now I have

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Probably etoys would be out of the list of activities to test. Gonzalo On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think so, it's not using gtk. On 13 March 2014 13:22, Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com wrote: Etoys is not in Python, I think. How

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Walter Bender
We could ask the Etoys maintainers to build us some sort of dbus interface we can work with. But I agree, it should be out of the first batch of programs we test. regards. -walter On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Probably etoys would be out of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
They could support the atk dbus interface (if I remember correctly it's not gtk only) but it would likely be a lot of work... On 13 March 2014 13:55, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: We could ask the Etoys maintainers to build us some sort of dbus interface we can work with. But

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Sai Vineet
Question: is there no other way to write UI tests? ATK is a pain. And if I'm not wrong ATK is a accessibility related thing, so we're using the using the wrong way to test? On Mar 13, 2014 6:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: They could support the atk dbus interface (if I remember

Re: [Sugar-devel] Feature freeze

2014-03-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: On 13 March 2014 08:50, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Daniel would you be amicable to stretching it out by a month so we have one more round of dev releases before entering freeze? Sorry for the delay

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
On 13 March 2014 14:20, Sai Vineet saivinee...@gmail.com wrote: Question: is there no other way to write UI tests? ATK is a pain. You need some kind of out-of-process mechanism to click around, see the UI etc. I'm not sure there is anything better than atk for that. And if I'm not wrong ATK

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.101.3 (unstable)

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Because of some issue we had with git, the sugar tarball included a few less commits than intended. Here is a new tarball http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.101.5.tar.xz * Fix #4733 remove warning on username change * Fix issue with activity updater breaking on

Re: [Sugar-devel] Weirdness in sugar git repository

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, thanks for reporting this. As discussed on irc, I have cherry picked and pushed the missing commits, I'm now releasing 0.101.5. It's not really clear to me how it happened. Looking at the buildbot logs, pull started breaking after my 0.101.4 commit, but looking at my bash history I was

[Sugar-devel] Changes to 0.102 schedule

2014-03-13 Thread Daniel Narvaez
Hello, as proposed by Gonzalo, the schedule for 0.102 has been updated 0.101.4 - 04/01/14 - Feature Freeze 0.101.5 - 05/01/14 - String, UI, API freeze 0.102.0 - 06/01/14 - Final release http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/roadmap The most important change is that Feature freeze has moved to April 1. --

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changes to 0.102 schedule

2014-03-13 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
Great. Will do good use of it. Gonzalo On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, as proposed by Gonzalo, the schedule for 0.102 has been updated 0.101.4 - 04/01/14 - Feature Freeze 0.101.5 - 05/01/14 - String, UI, API freeze 0.102.0 - 06/01/14 -

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changes to 0.102 schedule

2014-03-13 Thread Martin Abente
Sounds good! Lets keep in mind that we should to re-send some of the PRs because of the problem of with the sugar git repository history. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.orgwrote: Great. Will do good use of it. Gonzalo On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:38 AM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] My GSoC Proposal for activity unit tests

2014-03-13 Thread Gaurav Parida
Hi, Ok I will make the changes the changes in the timeline of the proposal. and keep the etoys as optional as of now. Yes I think dogtail is used by gnome people to do their UI tests. I'm not sure what is you issue with ATK exactly. The current sugar.test.uitree stuff is really low level, you