On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Someone remarked that teachers don't like to use Sugar. If not,... why not?
Ask them!
I hate to say that the user's not always right, but in Haiti at least, some
of the teachers are disappointed when they see Sugar
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:13:04PM -0700, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
One other thing I should mention about some Sugar Activities… some
of them really lack color. [...]
This was possibly the design decision to support the colourless
display of the XO laptop when used outdoors, as well as colour
Hi Folks…
Sorry I didn't put my 2 cents worth in sooner, but here are some
questions/suggestions I have re: planning for the future….
Someone remarked that teachers don't like to use Sugar. If not,… why not?
Ask them!
Obviously, the teachers in Uruguay like it and use it. But not all of it.
Sora...
Thanks for your thoughtful from the field answers! We need more of them. I
think I'll ask my friend Rosamel in Uruguay what she thinks and if she might
ask some of her collegues too. Mañana. I have to do it in Spanish so I'll wait
until morning when I am thinking clearly.
Caryl
Date:
I have finished categorizing the Sugar activities on BERNIE. The Backup
and Backup4G are the activities installed on the standard builds. The
Standard activities that I believe work without restriction. The Spanish
category is evident. The Web activity are activities that require
web-service
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
I know this is not a sugar issue directly, more of an OLPC issue but since
Fedora F12 the entire i686 platform's userland is being compiled with
-mtune=atom[1] which would use sse[2].
-mtune is designed not to break any
Thanks Sora for sharing. We are working in a questionnaire to get more
information
from the local deployments. If you agree, we can send it to you
to get more information from Haiti deployments.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Sora Edwards-Thro s...@unleashkids.org
wrote:
I just got
Thanks Samuel for start this public discussion. I share some of your
concerns,
and agree with your points.
I think we agree web activities is the way to move forward. We started to
work on that
for Sugar 0.100, and that will provide us the possibility of run activities
in any browser,
in android,
I hope this is not affected by Osborne effect [1]
These looks like 3d software generated images,
from that to a product ready to ship, there are a long way.
Gonzalo
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osborne_effect
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Lionel Laské lio...@olpc-france.org
wrote:
Hi
Thank you!
Eduardo
2015-02-26 22:19 GMT+00:00 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com:
Hello Eduardo,
You should be able to submmit translations to all Portuguese projects now
[1].
Regards,
Martin.
Refs:
1. http://translate.sugarlabs.org/pt/
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:06 PM,
Friday, February 27, 2015 2:07 PM -03:00 from Gonzalo Odiard
godi...@sugarlabs.org:
Thanks Samuel for start this public discussion. I share some of your concerns,
and agree with your points.
I think we agree web activities is the way to move forward. We started to work
on that
for Sugar
Hello,
Thank you all for your opinions. We'll try to consider/implement them.
James Cameron - thank you for your data, they were useful. We've hade
significant changes to page's layout and performance. Please check it now.
We've done some tests and page loads not longer than 3 seconds. UI is more
The problem with partners is that any partner who has established a
history of making good decision will ask the same question Mr. Greenfeld
asked to start this thread. If they get the same response Dr. Bender gave
Mr. Greenfeld they take their money and go back home.
Several individuals
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:28:14PM -0800, Aaron Borden wrote:
Very cool! The initial loading screen did seem a tad long but
probably not noticeable to most people with a modern laptop like
mine. I wonder if it's okay on an XO-1?
XO-1 with a 14.1.0 test build, with Flash Plugin:
- initial load
I think the load speed is caused by Tymon's site using basically every
JavaScript and css library that has ever been published. Does this version
load faster @Quozl? https://activities-2.sugarlabs.org/www-sugarlabs/
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:30 am James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Same test
Beside a gallery, what features is my version missing? My version is
100% based off yours, see the pull request I sent.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:05 am Tymon Radzik dwg...@gmail.com wrote:
I can use more if you want Sam ;). Seriously - all libraries I use are
needed for website. Your website
I can use more if you want Sam ;). Seriously - all libraries I use are
needed for website. Your website doesn't require features like my one. We
should rather take care about optimization in loading them, not on just
telling oh this is so slow...
Good night :-)
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:02 Sam P.
I use FitText to make text being more responsive and stretch it in width
div. I use also some additional jQuery code to take care about logos and
website colors. I will take a look on your PR in a second.
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:06 Sam P. sam.parkins...@gmail.com wrote:
Beside a gallery, what
Unfortunately I can check only mobile view now, I will give you opinion
tomorrow. Have a nice night!
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:08 Tymon Radzik dwg...@gmail.com wrote:
I use FitText to make text being more responsive and stretch it in width
div. I use also some additional jQuery code to take care
Yes, that version loads faster.
15.855 seconds for load and render.
2.824 seconds for render only.
But on your version, the video embedding element Google Code-In |
Promotional video on Sugar is beyond the visible area, only the
sugarlabs title on black background is visible.
Scrolling down by
I think Sam shouldnt work on separate project, rather help us in improving
exisiting one. And disscuis so radicial UI changes with us...
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:22 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Yes, that version loads faster.
15.855 seconds for load and render.
2.824 seconds for
On February 27, 2015 at 6:23 AM Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
I know this is not a sugar issue directly, more of an OLPC issue but
since
Fedora F12 the entire i686 platform's userland is being compiled with
I do not see it as separate, I see it as a useful contest of ideas.
That's what pull requests are for.
In this case, it has provided a substantial load and render benefit.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 12:23:50AM +, Tymon Radzik wrote:
I think Sam shouldnt work on separate project, rather help us
Yeah, but his concept of UI is radical different than ours. We want to go
bit more innovative. I dont have anything against PRs, but I think that's
one created by him shouldn't be merged before our works finish.
On Sat 28 Feb 2015 at 01:27 James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I do not see it as
Okay, I hear what you're saying ... but you have to have a good reason
than wanting to go a bit more innovative; it's not your desires that
matter, it's the good outcomes for Sugar Labs that matters.
And acceptance of a PR is up to the maintainer. Which isn't me,
thankfully.
On Sat, Feb 28,
I've reviewed the pull request:
https://github.com/walterbender/www-sugarlabs/pull/9
Perhaps you should take parts of Sam's pull request, the parts
that improve page loading time. If you can identify them.
It is unfortunate that Sam's pull request didn't split the style
changes from the page
Same test XO-1 laptop, same URLs, without clearing cache.
http://sugarlabs.org/~tymon/ ... load and render 35.343 seconds,
(previously 31 seconds),
http://sugarlabs.org/ ... load and render 6.064 seconds, (previously
5 seconds),
http://sugarlabs.org/~tymon/ ... render only, 14.080 seconds,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 03:31:50PM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 04:20:02PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On February 25, 2015 at 3:09 PM James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 01:20:19PM -0600, Jerry Vonau wrote:
I know this is not a sugar issue
From: samsongo...@hotmail.com
To: qu...@laptop.org
Subject: RE: [Sugar-devel] SugarLabs.org new website - looking for
opinions/ideas!
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:20:15 +0100
Hello, I have a little addition to this website, But i am not a web designer
but the Activity Section is suppose to
29 matches
Mail list logo
