Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

I can't imagine the process is so simple. The overwritten translations were probably on translate.sugarlabs.org. Sugar developers need to determine which Pootle files to install in an image. Each individual Sugar activity has an independent set of translations which needs to be updated into a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

Hi Dave, On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: Hi When sugar git moved from http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-old to https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar in 2013, why did issue tracking stay at bugs.sugarlabs.org and not move to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

On 2 April 2016 at 22:18, Tony Anderson wrote: > The Sugar activities, which represent 90% or more of the Sugar lines of > code, are being relocated to the github accounts of individual > developer/maintainers - not under a single Sugar account. > I think that is fine :)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

On 2 April 2016 at 23:46, Sebastian Silva wrote: > The translators hired by the Ministry of Education were surprised and > distressed when they started noticing Edgar was *overwriting *the updated > translations they were doing. > It seems Pootle is currently

Re: [Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

I am sure this would be helpful. However, the situation seems a bit more muddled. The Sugar activities, which represent 90% or more of the Sugar lines of code, are being relocated to the github accounts of individual developer/maintainers - not under a single Sugar account. At the moment

[Sugar-devel] Issue tracking on Github?

Hi When sugar git moved from http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-old to https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar in 2013, why did issue tracking stay at bugs.sugarlabs.org and not move to https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/issues ? I think it would be a good idea to move the issues, since pull requests

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

Chris, Sebastian This is a Peruvian indigenous language. Peru has a national XO program. So, I would assume that there are active OLPC deployments in areas where this language is spoken. Do we have contact with any of these schools? Are the schools using the XOs? I assume from this

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screenshot feature [GSoC Project]

Hi Utkarsh, The modal popup looks very nice. We actually need to make an api for modal popups so that we can replace the sub menus (eg. in journal palettes) with modal popups. That might interest you. Anyway, how does this feature work in with the current screenshot feature? You can

Re: [Sugar-devel] Screenshot feature [GSoC Project]

Hi, I have developed the working prototype of the "screenshot popup feature" wherein user could modify the name of the captured screenshot. Here is the demonstration of it's working -> http://imgur.com/0e1iq4v Please let me know you suggestions so that I can push it's PR soon :) Thanks,

Re: [Sugar-devel] ScreenSaver for sugarizer #2105

Great work Utkarsh! I have made some comments on the PR :) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] ScreenSaver for sugarizer #2105

Hi, The bug ticket #2105 was regarding the no screen savers in the sugar environment. I have added the same for the sugarizer in my fork ( https://github.com/crusher95/sugarizer) and sent in a pull request( https://github.com/llaske/sugarizer/pull/46) for the same. Thanking You, Utkarsh Dhawan

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Hi Chris, > I will try to be succinct in answering the questions you raise. I'm afraid I might have to go on in length to debunk your errors. > By Walter's apparent vote of no confidence in me and your

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] meeting reminder

Hi Chris, I will try to be succinct in answering the questions you raise. By Walter's apparent vote of no confidence in me and your insistence of having done no wrong I realize I will have to work with you if I want to get things done. I like to work openly. My problem with your nomination is