Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

I looked at shout IRC. The UI is awesome. no connection problem but people have to install the client to communicate, unlike webchat have a look at https://kiwiirc.com/ -- Venketesh Mahapatra ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Speech Recognition

not sure if this will help you but take a look at these http://www.noobslab.com/2014/06/control-your-ubuntulinux-mint-system.html https://github.com/baitsart/voice-commands -- Venketesh Mahpatra a patra ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Speech Recognition

The application of speech recognition for Sugar is to enable learners to pronounce words or sentences in English (or other second language) and have the speech recognition affirm by recognition that the sounds are sufficiently accurate. Currently this is often done by having the learner

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

My understanding is that this discussion is properly on the Sugar Labs site in the form of wiki pages which any registered member can modify or discuss. Sebastian is proposing a new method. Until that method achieves consensus and Sugar Labs starts to migrate to the new method, I think you

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Hi Utkarsh I really have a hard time understanding this discussion. You have a copy of browser. This is browse 157.2 with an integrated 'fiddler' running as a separate activity. The problem is that the three red dots button is not a standard Sugar toolbar button. The sub-menu is not a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Speech Recognition

Hello Justin, I've never used any speech recognition software but I have worked a little on speech synthesis, and I was always looking for an opportunity to work on speech recognition. I'm interested in working and contributing to the project during summers. Could you please send me more details

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

On 27 April 2016 at 09:32, Utkarsh Tiwari wrote: > What would you guys suggest? > I suggest preparing a docker file for loomio with Sugar Labs branding/configs, and then setting it up with motions for the next SLOB meeting - which I think are listed on the wiki :)

[Sugar-devel] Speech Recognition

The application I am working on, and targeting across multiple platforms is HTML5 + JavaScript for ease of portability. Right now I have a very naive Speech Recognition system in place, but I plan to use CMU's PocketSphinx (particularly the Pocketsphinx.js port). Has anyone else used any

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

I personally think gitter is a better choice. at least the #sugar should be moved to gitter. -- Venketesh Mahpatra ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

Hi, I am sorry :( I didn't mean to offend anyone. I was just thinking to make gaining community consensus easier. Thanks, Utkarsh Tiwari On Apr 27, 2016 8:18 PM, "Sebastian Silva" wrote: > > > El 27/04/16 a las 09:06, Jonas Smedegaard escribió: > > Quoting

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

El 27/04/16 a las 09:06, Jonas Smedegaard escribió: > Quoting Utkarsh Tiwari (2016-04-27 15:32:26) >> In a recent chat with Mr. Sebastian Silva, he shared the need to >> change out general discussion platform from 'mailing list' to some >> other platforms like - gitter.com or loomio.org to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

Quoting Utkarsh Tiwari (2016-04-27 15:32:26) > In a recent chat with Mr. Sebastian Silva, he shared the need to > change out general discussion platform from 'mailing list' to some > other platforms like - gitter.com or loomio.org to gain community > consensus on a specific topic. > There isn't

[Sugar-devel] Discussion platform

Hi, In a recent chat with Mr. Sebastian Silva, he shared the need to change out general discussion platform from 'mailing list' to some other platforms like - gitter.com or loomio.org to gain community consensus on a specific topic. There isn't too much activity on #sugar either. What would

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Hi Sam, Your idea looks good. Thank you for putting in your efforts. If Tony agrees upon the idea of having a separate activity for JS-fiddler, I can start modifying your activity to completion. Thanks, Utkarsh On 4/27/16, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Tony, you

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Tony, you are complicating your life by trying to shove this into browse. This could be it's own python activity and that would be easier. To help you on your journey, I hacked something up for you 1 hour last weekend. It is a very basic python activity that almost already matches the

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Hi, The errors which I am facing happened when I pulled the 'webkit2' branch from https://github.com/sugarlabs/browse-activity.git I switched to that branch and ran the browse. While tryig to access a page(like google.com), browse is taking a lot of time and doesnt load the pages at all and

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Hi Sam The goal of Utkarsh's project is to integrate Richa Sehgal's GSOC work with Browse. This was the original goal but at the time Gonzalo was not available. Ideally, an integration with 158 would save a step, I think it would not be helpful to use a development project to test webkit2.

Re: [Sugar-devel] WebKit2 Browse - Download and Test

Hi Tony, 157.2 is not a very big release. If you're not testing the WebKit2 port, it is probably not helpful for finding bugs in the webkit2 port. If you're involved in a deployment using comodity hardware, this is probably something that you want to look into. While webkit2 is a big

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: News Item: ARM Donations

Should we donate an XO-1.75 and an XO-4? Tony On 04/27/2016 02:07 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: New GNOME ARM hardware upstream. Just thought this might be of interest with respect to XO-4 support. cjl -- Forwarded message -- From: Nuritzi Sanchez Date: Tue,