your bug #1969 and contacted a blind programmer to check
> the selected keys. We can write in the wiki a plan and work together
> with small patches.
Great! Small patches have a higher potential to apply cleanly to both
0.84 and 0.90.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codew
hat faster for reviewers to read and to quote.
Also, this is what git-send-email does by default, and what git-am
expects as input. Therefore, by following this convention you never
have to leave your precious shell to exchange patches over email :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.or
...
end_time = time()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print elapsed_time
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
htt
SVGs are so much slower (loading? parsing?
rendering?) and fix it, it would impact all of Sugar. This might be
an interesting opportunity!
Let me have a look this afternoon!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.s
A visual inspection of the problem
files reveals they mostly contain just a with a few dozen
points in it.
It seems GDK supports SVG through a loader plugin. Can we put the
blame on librsvg for this slowness? Are there alternative SVG
renderers we could try?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://
timing of "rsvg foo.svg foo.png"?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
n bindings, it seems.
Could you do some benchmarking between the two?
I'm not sure we'd ever want to add a dependency on libagg and
wxWindows, but it would give an idea of how good or bad our current
stack is.
The gnash folks, for instance, report huge performance gains by
switchi
ss about hard numbers and reproducible benchmarks.
So be prepared to show enough evidence backing your claims :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing lis
or
src.sugarlabs.org for the application.
Alternatively, we could change the code to look for the repositories
in http://git.sugarlabs.org/git/ .
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> [cc += osl]
>
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> the public and http clone urls are *not* working. For example try:
>>
>> http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar/repos/mainline
>>
>> This is a blocker to make those official repos, ob
thread in the sugar-devel@ list: it's been
fixed a couple of days ago, but the rest of the traffic went through
osuosl's RT.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-
ng the correct capitalization for project names?
Gitorious uses intentionally two separate names, the "slug", which is
a single lowercase word for the URL, and a pretty print project title.
> Bernie said you have an account. It is the one at shell.sugarlabs.org.
Yes.
--
// Bern
l soon buy more RAM and relocate the server while I'm enjoying
holidays in NYC and Washington!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.s
And this one too.
Original Message
Subject: [Systems] Build slaves
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:49:09 -0500
From: Bernie Innocenti
Organization: Sugar Labs Foundation - http://sugarlabs.org/
To: Sugar Labs Systems
Ciao,
our buildbot slaves can now be reached throw this handy
Forgot to notify sugar-devel@
Original Message
Subject: [Systems] git.sugarlabs.org down?
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:45:17 -0500
From: Bernie Innocenti
Organization: Sugar Labs Foundation - http://sugarlabs.org/
To: OSU-OSL Support
CC: Sugar Labs Systems
The vm does not even
bs.org
domain for shared static content and put it on sunjammer.
How does it sound?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.or
while rendering the main project page.
The errant user_id belonged to a user who got locked out and had asked
to be deleted. Now we know to be careful not to break referential
integrity if we ever need to hack the database again :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
Walter Bender wrote:
> Wow!!
We have great release notes lately.
To credit authors, I'd also append the patch summary by author,
Linus-style. It can quickly be obtained this way:
git log v0.83.3..HEAD | git-shortlog
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Su
and is rather easy to deduce, therefore I'd opt it out.
- The leading dot at the end should not be included because
it looks super ugly in the subject of an email.
- To reduce clutter, I'd make the "SL" prefix implied, and leave
other prefixes such as OLPC#123 and
ts and not Sugarlabs
> ones. I'd say it makes sense to allow "SL" as a hint, but just have it
> be optional so that for packages only maintained upstream at Sugarlabs
> there is no need to add it to eah and eery bug hint.
I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the
>> "Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then
>> we could has well use the prefix consis
k it's related to the size of the file. Writeable file
mappings are just not supported by jffs2, and cause mmap() to return
an error.
glibc likes to do it when building the locale-archive, and I vaguely
remember I had a workaround for this in our fork of the glibc rpm.
--
// B
ering all the associated workarounds is
going to cost a lot of time.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
ned files around. I thought it was
fixed, but apparently not. I'll check and let you know.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
; new scheme of things.
>
> I'm happy to be back.
Thanks a lot for helping!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> [cc += sugar-de...@]
>
> Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>> Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it
>> looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to
>> clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by
>> th
ed it
again.
We should also upgrade to 0.11.2, but I'd prefer Ivan or Noah to do it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlab
//www.thefreedictionary.com/sugar+shell>).
I made the same proposal on the marketing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarla
ges in this release cycle with
all the repository migrations to Sugar Labs and shuffling maintainers.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists
"sugar" as
> now, or sugar-shell or sugar-jarabe reflecting an eventual upstream
> rename of same package (else I see no reason to change name for Debian).
Afaik, jarabe has not been shipped as an independent module and there
are no plans to do so.
Or does that mean that
news, if any :)
What version of the XO builds is being deployed?
With what base activities?
The page says that the technical team will develop new activities.
We would like to stay in contact with the developers on IRC and on
the sugar-devel mailing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www
[cc += sugar-devel@, sayamindu]
Let's crosspost to a wider audience to get some feedback on this idea.
Luke Faraone wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Bernie Innocenti <mailto:ber...@codewiz.org>> wrote:
>
> This server has just transitioned into product
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> Sugar has replaced in 0.83.x where it used gnomevfs with GIO, so we
> can drop that dependency.
Kudos!
Sugar is loosing bloat so quickly that, at this rate, it will
disappear by 1.0.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
fixed", or something like that.
I'd also like to discuss how our time-based releases relate with the
need to fix all blockers before a release.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
__
/ Bernie you might be able to do it
> quickly, thanks.
Done, although not quickly, sorry.
The Distribution/OS is in the section [ticket-custom] of trac.ini, and
admittedly the web interface does not provide a way to edit it.
Maybe Noah knows why?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://w
take.
The default severity is now Unspecified. I thought I had configured
it like that a lot of time ago.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Another issue is how we integrate the updater with addons.sl.o.
> Because the OLPC microformat is trivial, it might be easy to modify
> the remora's html output to be compatible with it. Mick, Tomeu and
> David, who have had a closer look at the co
tion work to make the current updater work in SoaS with
addons.sl.o as a backend.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
to get help for any of these points. Actually, I will follow
the mantra of doing only what nobody else is already doing.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> I guess at some point the default was Blocker, because there lots of
> tickets marked that way in trac.
Yeah, we should re-prioritize them. Do we have a Bugmaster role?
We should
/me steps back... quickly!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.or
to non-trivial networking protocols, I don't trust any
given individual to be able to do a good job without going through an
*extensive* iterative design process with public reviews of interim
drafts.
What's hardest about networking is that it looks deceptively easy at
first :-)
--
//
Noah Kantrowitz wrote:
> No one ever got around to making a web UI for it. There is a plugin I
> can install if you would like.
Yes please!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarla
perhaps suggesting to use DDNS to publish those services
on a nameserver running on the XS?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
hanical keys: you propagate the event only after
the state has settled for a certain amount of time.
This would take away a certain percentage of spurious updates, but the
number basically remains proportional to the number of users so it
doesn't scale much better.
--
// Bernie Innocen
nyway, stuff that doesn't exist yet.
>> Wait, are you perhaps suggesting to use DDNS to publish those services
>> on a nameserver running on the XS?
>
> That is how DNS-SD works, yes.
I do not understand the security side of it, and how old records get
garbage collected unl
VM which works with paravirtualized kernels.
Our sugarlabs4.xen.prgmr.com machine is already using it. Ask
dfarning for access to it while I'm still traveling around.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
an we add a tip somewhere in the DevelopmentTeam pages?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> No I haven't. See thread on de...@laptop.org about sharing build infra
> with OLPC though.
What is the subject? I fell behind with the OLPC lists.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.su
as
we're going to phase them out at some point.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
y. I need to commit my patches on git.sl.o
after I come back from vacation.
I believe Mick has been working on the remora side, but I don't know
the actual status. Mick?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
_
by means of
~/.ssh/authorized_keys.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@.
>>
>> Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository
>> page. Internally, gitorious dispatches i
.
A few of those are *already* using a wide range of display
resolutions. The sooner we shake these bugs out of activities, the
better experience we provide to our users.
>From 354a93c3b705a264eb9bdcf80ef607a4721447a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernie Innocenti
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:04
ourceview2 as a dependency
We might consider moving such artificial dependencies meant to support
activities in a metapackage implementing the common activity ABI as
discussed at FUDCon.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
> sunjammer when I log in there with ssh -A?
No, I think it would prevent your agent on sunjammer to be forwarded
to the gitorious machine too (a waste of time since you cannot log
anywhere else anyway).
> Though I would swear I was able last week.
Check $SSK_AUTH_SOCK from sunjammer, an
Simon Schampijer wrote:
> We need in in the shell actually (ViewSource) :)
Ohhh...
/me realized how much he fell behind on development issues
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.
hange it every once in a while to catch those who have
hard-coded or special-cased the new default in their code.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sug
Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:22:50PM +0100, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
>> if dimensions is not None:
>> cmd.append('-screen')
>> cmd.append(dimensions)
>> -elif gtk.gdk.screen_width() < 1200 or
> not sure what's the current thinking in Mozilla and distros about
> packaging addons in distros, but if there's any chance they want to
> support source tarballs, we'll get that support for free.
Indeed!
--
// Bernie Innocen
the kernel folks have been putting in on network
> containerization and memory-resource cgroups "to the masses".
I'm with you on this. Actually, Rainbow is the only part of OLPC's
security I find actually beneficial for the user.
--
// B
instead. This way, at least, we
don't set the expectations of those few human posters too high.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@list
've always wanted something like that!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
r easy conversion.
Where does the bundle specification live these days? Last time I've
read it, it was still on wiki.laptop.org.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-de
ms like a great idea to me... But I think it already came up some
time ago, and I vaguely remember that RH legal blocked it because the
license itself -- not just a symlink to it -- had to accompany the
package.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codew
details what have changed from a user point of view
> will be handled in the detailed 0.84 release notes.
>
> Thanks everyone for your great contributions!
Kudos!
This release cycle was simply great, congratulations to everyone
who worked so hard on it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http:/
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
> could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.
Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?
Did we announce it on Freshmeat? Slashdot? LWN? OLPCNews?
--
//
blame.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
David Farning wrote:
> Nice,
> Are they running on a new machine at PGRMR?
Not yet. I pinged the prgmr.com folks about it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel m
ion today or tomorrow. It gets transferred over
fast ethernet so it will be down for an hour or two while the
disk is copied. I'll email you again before I do it. Thanks.
Nick Schmalenberger
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs
worked on it over 6 months ago:
http://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/video-chat-activity/
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
htt
trac for all activities.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
it also does video with H263, MPEG4, theora and H264 codecs!
http://www.linphone.org/index.php/eng/features
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
irrors
which have not been polling the master site for a while...
As for adding a Torrent tracker, this is indeed a great idea and I just
didn't get around to do it. Please, file a ticket for me so I don't forget.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs -
On 05/19/09 16:34, David Farning wrote:
> Infrastructure meeting are (usually) on Fridays.
Except that I've been quite negligent in running them, and I'm afraid
I'm going to be offline next Friday too.
Let's reschedule when I'm back from Paris, or follow up by email.
Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly?
Original Message
Subject: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:29:23 -0700
From: Jesse Keating
Reply-To: fedora-l...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
To: fedora-announce-l...@redhat.com, fedora-devel-annou...@r
On 05/20/09 10:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly?
Sorry, my brain is broken. I parsed "11" as "12" and hit Send before
actually reading the full announcement.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
scripts are stupid enough to fail tests silently and proceed
anyway using "no" as a command name in make :-)
If there's consensus on implementing one or more of these points, I can
provide patches (or just go on and commit them).
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/
Anyone wants to take it over?
Original Message
Subject:Re: Reviving Sugarbot
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:58:40 -0400
From: Zach Riggle
To: Bernie Innocenti
CC: Titus Brown
Bernie
I am extremely busy this summer, so I won't be able to assist
pita to maintain.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
way. Do you have any idea where I should look?
>> If there's consensus on implementing one or more of these points, I can
>> provide patches (or just go on and commit them).
>
> Totally, Sascha is the maintainer so coordinate with him.
OK.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> BTW text like "the dependency check will fail if you don't have a
> DISPLAY set" does not mean too much for Windows people like me (I did
> manage to google the answer so it was not a question).
You're right. Please, update the wiki with more information for
eze/sid, Fedora 10/11, Ubuntu intrepid/jaunty).
Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
cecream for you :-P
Uh? We're compiling xulrunner on all distros afaik. At least, we're
compiling it on Fedora 11.
> [1] http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/137
Hmm... this is still assigned to marcopg. Could you reassign it to
yourself or find some other victim?
--
// Bernie
perform a mere build.
If this behavior could be changed without messing up too much with
upstream jhbuild, I'd vote to decouple updating modules from building them.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
On 05/22/09 20:18, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>
>> Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding
>> it.
> Thanks! The way Fedora versioning works is starting to get annoying (I
> had to
.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
u-kvm -cdrom Soas2-200905212052_sayamindu_metacity.iso -boot d -m
> 1024M
I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu.
But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11.
Anyway, good job!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
On 05/23/09 19:16, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu.
> But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11.
Oh, wait! It was just damn slow because I wasn't using kvm (permissions
issue).
Now I could test it, and it lo
On 05/25/09 09:48, Brian Jordan wrote:
> Is anyone against retiring the activit...@lists.laptop.org list in
> favor of migration to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org?
+1.
I think platform developers should be aware of the challenges of
activity writers, and vice-versa.
--
// Bernie Inn
On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
>> RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it.
>
> Ugh. That's a ton for a wm
[cc += cwickert]
On 05/25/09 12:10, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>> The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
>>> RSS. But I s
shared pages, so it's an equally unreliable estimate.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
could not find kernel image: linux
The same USB stick boots fine on any other computer I could find.
Does it seem like a syslinux bug? And if turns out to be a known BIOS
bug, is there a good workaround?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
ier: 0x000aa8c2
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 * 19082 2007006+ c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
>> 221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders
>
> I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up with
> these kinds of geometries. T
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one:
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
>> 64 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1011 cylinders
> ^^
>
> Equally wei
On 06/02/09 13:48, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>> Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one:
>>>
>>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
>>&g
vel@ mailing list.
Cool!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>> On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
>>>> 221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders
>>> I don
On 06/04/09 20:51, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>>
>>> Equally weird. The only "standard" ones are 64 heads, 32 sectors and
>>> 255 heads, 63 sectors.
>>
>> Indeed, repartitioning the USB stick with 32 sectors and 255 head
201 - 300 of 847 matches
Mail list logo
