Morgan Collett wrote: > I vote for sugar-shell as the component name, because the distros > should be able to keep that name, and it's more obvious what the > component does.
+1 from me too, but let's wait until after 0.84 is released, we already had enough destabilizing changes in this release cycle with all the repository migrations to Sugar Labs and shuffling maintainers. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
