On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Well, if we decide that future releases of Sugar should run ok on the
>> next major release of CentOS, we cannot depend on later versions of
>> python, gtk, etc.
>
> I'm not sure something like sugar which is (and should be) fast moving
> mixes well
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> I wonder, though, if the current SoaS is going to be the primary
>> LiveUSB distribution of Sugar supported by upstream (known as SoaS).
>
> I think Sugar should treat all downstreams equally, so there would be no
> primary distro. But users/deployment
Just a brief note: Douglas knows more about Fedora Live stuff than just
about anybody in the world -- his work was one of the original drivers of
the Fedora Live project. He's kinda the Godfather of the Fedora Live CD.
So thanks, Douglas. Good to see you helping these folks out.
--g
On We
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Is there any interest in figuring out how assessments might work in a
Sugar activity API?
Teachers frequently talk about the need to assess the progress of their
pupils. In the context of an activity, how do teachers do that? I
don't think there's a
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> 2009/6/15 Maria Droujkova :
>> David,
>>
>> For frameworks, you may want to look at "achievement systems" and
>> "reputation systems" (e.g. karma on slashdot). I just helped a
>> colleague with his grant proposal about adding achievement systems to a
>
Hello folks.
Is there any interest in figuring out how assessments might work in a
Sugar activity API?
Teachers frequently talk about the need to assess the progress of their
pupils. In the context of an activity, how do teachers do that? I don't
think there's a clear mechanism, and I suspe
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
> Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> Maybe my ignorance on matters selinux is showing? ;-)
>
> You are not alone. Sugar/OLPC simply never had SELinux experts who
> volunteered to work on Rainbow. We still don't (raise your hand if you
> consider yourself
Yes, I've been neglecting this. Apologies.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, David Farning wrote:
> Greg and other developers,
>
> Could you post your scheduled meeting informatio
We're getting close to release of 0.84, and we can still use some focused
testing.
Testing is a lot more fun, and effective, when you do it with friends.
(Collaboration testing absolutely requires it.) So if you have time,
*please* join us on Monday and Tuesday. The developers will all show
+1 to activities.sl.o.
Seems like a pretty strong vote. :)
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Eben Eliason wrote:
> +1 for activities from me, as well.
>
> "Addons" makes it sound
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, build...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs
> Buildbot.
> Full details are available at:
> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/80
>
> Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
>> erikos ran an awesome meeting. My notes on what I think the purpose should
>> be:
>>
>> First Goal. To go through all UNCONFIRMED bug reports and determine:
>>
>> * whether the
erikos ran an awesome meeting. My notes on what I think the purpose
should be:
First Goal. To go through all UNCONFIRMED bug reports and determine:
* whether the bug report is a dupe. if so, close as Duplicate.
* whether the bug report is missing key info. if so, ask questions in bug
and
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, David Farning wrote:
> Added.
>
> You might need to white-list buildbot in the list moderation.
Done, thanks.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
__
Should these perhaps be going to Fedora-olpc list as well?
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, build...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Edward Cherlin wrote:
> Is anybody going to PyCon? We have booth space and could use coders
> and mentors for the sprints.
I will be there.
--g
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.o
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Dear Sugar team,
>>
>> I've been very confused (and frankly, significantly angered) by recent
>> remarks that I've encountered both in person (e.g. from Bernie) and in
>> #sugar (e.g. fro
So. If someone can point me to the *authoritative iso image* that we want
to use for SoaS, I will make sure that we have install stations at the
Fedora booth at FOSDEM.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry
Will this be a continuing weekly meeting?
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Wade Brainerd wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please join us for the first Sugar Labs ActivityTeam IRC meeting this
A big +1 to lollipop.
--g
--
Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer!
[[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> The name "Soas" lacks pizazz. How about "lollipop"? After all, a
> lollipop is just ...
>
> ___
Perhaps there's already a place for this. Maybe it's being managed
through Trac. But I need a place to put Cool New Projects for Sugar
developers -- and mainly I mean projects that one motivated person could
be excited by, pick up, and just *do*. Therefore, I created the following
wiki page
21 matches
Mail list logo
