+1 to activities.sl.o. Seems like a pretty strong vote. :)
--g -- Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer! [[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]] On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Eben Eliason wrote: > +1 for activities from me, as well. > > "Addons" makes it sound like a plugin system, which activities are > not. Activities are distinct self contained bundles for a variety of > purposes, and I think embracing the term "activities" will make it > much easier for anyone even somewhat new to Sugar to make sense of > things. > > - Eben > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Gary C Martin <g...@garycmartin.com> wrote: >> On 18 Feb 2009, at 21:48, David Farning wrote: >> >>> There has been some talk of what the final name for aslo should be. >>> >>> addons.sugarlabs.org >>> or >>> activities.sugarlabs.org >> >> +1 to activities, it's sugar friendly, relevant, and to be honest >> 'addons' as a (non-dictionary) name seems alien to me with vague >> references to firefox tech (which I do occasionally use when a site >> complains about Safari) but that will have no direct meaning for >> majority of Sugar users. >> >>> Which do you prefer? I like activities.sl.o better but it means more >>> work for me to change it. So, for me, it is a wash. >>> >>> david >>> >>> (Contributors with marketing or brand development can have two votes) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel