On Jan 4, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Wade Brainerd wrote:
> Personally, I don't believe that Sugar Labs the organization needs
> to be concerned with any of these four points.
Ahh, but a recurring question from existing Sugar deployments is how
to get Flash, why Flash doesn't run faster, etc.
> The q
On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:04 AM, David Farning
> wrote:
>> I just wanted to bump this line of questions as, it is the critical
>> set of questions which will determine the future viability of Sugar.
>>
>> If anyone as more informed, please corr
Since I finally mentioned that OLPC and I had parted ways in an earlier
email, I really need to thank the OLPC community for providing me
with the opportunity to work with you for the past seven years.
Reuben continues to provide outstanding deployment support for all XO laptops,
and I will still
On May 12, 2014, at 7:34 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:08:41AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>> Probably you already know that, but xo-1 and xo-1.5 have a 8686
>> wireless card, different to the 8787 in the xo-4
>
> Actually, XO-1 has 8388 and is soldered down card.
XO-1:
Walter,
You remember correctly. The hard/clicky/crunchy keyboards are not rated
for as long a lifetime as the membrane/chewy keyboards. While the membrane
keyboard design was tested to 5 million key presses, IIRC the clicky keyboard is
only rated to 1 million key presses. (On the other han
On Jun 16, 2014, at 9:05 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:03 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>
> Walter,
>You remember correctly. The hard/clicky/crunchy keyboards are not rated
> for as long a lifetime as the membrane/chewy keyboards. While the membrane
&g
rds - the outer edges of my fingers get in the way of a
> full key depress. Then again, the keys aren't designed for me, so I'm
> curious how these do in the field.
>
> cheers,
> Sameer
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 6:03 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>>
>> W
> When OS X starts up with a search box open
> instead of a blank desktop we'll know we are there :)
What a nightmare !I'm sorry, but once you move past trivial amounts
of information, correctly specifying the search or filtering through
the results of a loosely specified search takes forever
The reflashing process on all XO laptops automatically handles bad sectors.
On an XO-1, these are identified as red blocks on the screen when reflashing
and are automatically skipped.
On an XO-1.5 and XO-1.75, the bad sectors are identified and mapped out of
use by the controller in the SD/MMC c
What is the preferred API for adding touchscreen (or mouse) support
to a Sugar activity ?
Ideally it would support multitouch and provide simple gesture
support, but I'll settle for much less :-)
Fedora 15 or earlier please, this is for ARM.
Cheers,
wad
On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:16 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> What is the preferred API for adding touchscreen (or mouse) support
>> to a Sugar activity ?
>>
>> Ideally it would support multitouch and provide simple gesture
>> support, but I'll settle for much less :-)
>>
>> Fedora 15 or earlier please, th
On Jan 3, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:04 PM, John Watlington wrote:
>>
>> What is the preferred API for adding touchscreen (or mouse) support
>> to a Sugar activity ?
>
> Should just work.
The activity was limited to keyboar
On Jul 26, 2012, at 11:09 PM, Sameer Verma wrote:
> www.engadget.com/2012/07/26/olpc-xo-touch-1-75-to-use-neonode-tech/
>
> The post says "as yet unreleased XO 1.75". What's the official status
> on the 1.75? Still as yet unreleased?
It's been shipping for some time now.
I don't know where they
We got a new version of firmware from Neonode last week that improves
things a small amount. I'm not sure what the state of the firmware auto-update
it.
One complication is that it was tuned for the tinted light guides, and
doesn't work as well with the clear ones. I have some tinted light gui
14 matches
Mail list logo
