Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Tony Anderson passed away

2023-02-19 Thread Sean DALY
Sad news... Tony so often had great ideas and unending energy to contribute Sean On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 6:27 PM Walter Bender wrote: > Sad news. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Nancie Severs > Date: Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 3:56 PM > Subject: Re: Tony Anderson passed away > To

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sur] Oversight Board Elections 2019-21 has begun!

2020-01-16 Thread Sean DALY
Unfortunately, the voting system failed in my case, apparently due to a bug in the CIVS automatic browser language detection system. I have asked Vipul and CIVS to find a solution so I may vote. Sean On Wednesday, January 15, 2020, Vipul Gupta wrote: > Hello folks, > The Oversight Board electio

Re: [Sugar-devel] Hello guys please i want to ask if any one can help me on how to convert colors that are in hex to the color name :)

2018-11-30 Thread Sean DALY
One possible approach could be to model a hex-name lookup table such as on this page [1], rounding to the nearest named color. Some ideas are here [2]. Sean 1. https://imagemagick.org/script/color.php 2. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38923744/how-to-map-a-range-of-hex-values-to-a-color O

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-15 Thread Sean DALY
So your idea is: no trademarks at all? Do you think Sugar Labs should give up its trademark? Is your goal to undermine Sugar Labs and/or OLPC? Sean On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > On 15/09/17 10:59, Sean DALY wrote: > > The copyrights are licensed unde

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOB] Motion regarding xo-computer icon

2017-09-15 Thread Sean DALY
on and, if it passes, >>>> the results be reported to Tony by Adam, our SFC liaison. Of course, if the >>>> motion does not pass, we will need to continue the discussion. >>>> >>>> I second the motion. >>>> >>>> >>>>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [SLOBS] [SLOB] xo-computer icon

2017-09-14 Thread Sean DALY
be found here: https://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html#x1-660005.4.2 Sean. Le jeu. 14 sept. 2017 à 09:02, Sebastian Silva a écrit : > On 14/09/17 08:00, Sean DALY wrote: > > Sebastian — these principles apply to copyright, not trademarks, > > patents, or trade secrets.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [SLOBS] [SLOB] xo-computer icon

2017-09-14 Thread Sean DALY
Sebastian — these principles apply to copyright, not trademarks, patents, or trade secrets. Sean Le jeu. 14 sept. 2017 à 08:50, Sebastian Silva a écrit : > > > On 14/09/17 07:37, Sean DALY wrote: > > Laura, I am not a lawyer, but the inclusion of a trademarked logo does not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SLOBS] [SLOB] xo-computer icon

2017-09-14 Thread Sean DALY
Laura, I am not a lawyer, but the inclusion of a trademarked logo does not make software nonfree. Software is copyrighted after all; it's the license that brings freedom to it. In the absence of a formal trademark agreement, lawyers look at the way a trademark is used, and what the trademark owner

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 Thread Sean DALY
wish to design marketing materials to resemble the Sugar interface. Sean [1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Booth_Banners On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Laura Vargas wrote: > > 2017-09-13 16:02 GMT-05:00 Sean DALY : > >> In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo

Re: [Sugar-devel] logo dicussion

2017-09-13 Thread Sean DALY
In the past, OLPC was amenable to the use of the xo logo in Sugar, but asked we not use it in marketing materials without a formal co-branding licensing agreement. [1,2] The proposed feet logo is likely a violation of the GNOME Foundation trademark, more info on their site [3]. Sean. 1. http://l

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sur] [SLOBS] [IAEP] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-06-19 Thread Sean DALY
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions This page is very useful. On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Claudia Urrea wrote: > Dave and all, > > I think we need someone to admin the motions. We have too many (pass, > pending votes and pending endorsement for vote, etc.), they become

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Better Idea...

2016-06-11 Thread Sean DALY
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Laura Vargas wrote: > Thanks for reading/commenting Thanks Laura, I have made some additions. Dave - I don't agree that whomever submits a grant application becomes the treasurer for those funds. What should happen is a sales cycle: if there is interest, the S

Re: [Sugar-devel] Suggestions

2016-06-11 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:05 PM, samson goddy wrote: > And Sean, i really want to make this madatory to all members in SL. Since > you are in-charge of marketing how can i get started? Samson - I'm afraid there's no mandatory anything :-) nearly all of us are unpaid volunteers... I'm nobody's

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media

2016-06-09 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ifeanyi Peter wrote: > Maybe anytime we have suggestions that concerns Marketing, we would just > forward it to the Marketing Dept. for review. How to I join the marketing > team as well, I have some suggestions. Thanks Ifeanyi To join the Marketing team, just

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Go Social via Social Media (Proposal/Motion)

2016-06-09 Thread Sean DALY
I'm sorry, I don't see how SL can support a new paid position. My suggestion would be to evaluate how the paid Translation Manager position works out. I'm glad Samson you are eager to work on social media (as I've said), however I don't understand your marketing objectives. Put another way, just w

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] A Better Idea...

2016-06-05 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Caryl I think you're saying that all SLOBs should be active fundraisers as part of the role? We could also say we "need a team of dedicated volunteers" to work on adapting Sugar Activities to curricula, on developing teacher tools, on providing support, on adding platforms, on localization, ev

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:27 PM, samson goddy wrote: > should we use the adventage of the monetizing My point of view is that we "monetize" through CTAs and fundraising, rather than wait 27 years to get the resources we need through random ads. Sean. ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
Yes Samson, the SFC fulfills these criteria. I am sure we would qualify. But as Adam says, let's sort out what we want to do first before going to the SFC. First step is a donor link which lands on their page with SL as prefilled choice. I suggest we try to go for Google Ad Grants, but this requir

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > How about "turtle in a box" videos? That would be aligned with our > mission/vision :) Indeed! if there is any way to generate zillions of views it's with turtles ;-) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
Samson - what about Google's program for nonprofits? https://www.google.com/grants/ Sean On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, samson goddy wrote: > > okay i am going to create an open doc in google then explain further about > the video ads. The youtube ads is not as you think, that's why me and

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > I am eager to see real data on this YouTube advertiser RPM (revenue per thousand views), called eCPM by YouTube ("effective cost per thousand"), commonly varies from 50 US cents to $5 (before Google's Adsense 45% cut). I say commonly, bec

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > I'm not saying if $X or $Y is greater; I am saying that we don't know > which is greater, and Samson will learn a lot by trying to maximize > the revenue of both. > In that case, I'm saying random ads will generate peanuts, while well-thou

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-03 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Your assertion that SL would see more revenue from CTA compared to ads. How can I make up data for a fundraising drive which hasn't happened yet? Sean ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@li

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-02 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > What data do you have to back up this assertion? :) Um, which assertion? ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Smart way to get $$ for posting videos on youtube

2016-06-02 Thread Sean DALY
I myself don't see an upside with allowing random ads to be associated with Sugar Labs, for the tiny amount of income we might receive. If indeed our US nonprofit status through SFC would allow gains from advertising. Far better to do Calls to Action ("CTA" in their jargon) and Annotations, request

Re: [Sugar-devel] Open Source fonts

2016-05-25 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Ütkarsh, you could look at the Libertine Open Fonts Project (GPL/OPL) http://www.linuxlibertine.org Sean On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:36 PM, Ütkarsh Tiwari wrote: > Hi, > Could anyone here please suggest any open source fonts which I can > use in my acitivities or provide me link to any s

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > Done. Wow! bravo Walter that was quick!! Sean ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Fortunately, SLOBs votes are done via email, at any time, and the monthly > SLOBs meetings are there to unjam any backlogs. ah I was under the impression that motions were debated and voted in the meetings, with recourse to e-mail when m

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] another motion (Quispe trip to Translation Summit)

2016-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > FWIW I think this is reasonable, since the board have shared and equal > financial responsibility for the Conservancy account. In my view it's theoretically reasonable, however there is a real risk of red tape logjam. It's quite common fo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] GSoC mentor stipend motion

2016-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
Ideally not just the Donate button, but the other methods too? Sean On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Sean DALY wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Tony Anderson > wrote: > >> More importantly, I think the first step is to provide a simple way for >> membe

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] GSoC mentor stipend motion

2016-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > More importantly, I think the first step is to provide a simple way for > members or non-members to donate to support Sugar Labs. Is this paypal, > credit card or Is this something that SFC must provide or can > SugarLabs do this on i

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder and some open issues to discuss

2016-05-12 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Sam Parkinson wrote: > Us volunteers write code, make releases, do user testing, etc. Sam - I'm not aware that anyone here is other than "us volunteers". Dues are how many if not most normally functioning nonprofits operate. I am co-founder and treasurer of a s

Re: [Sugar-devel] facebook verification

2016-05-02 Thread Sean DALY
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > What is the US trademark registration number? > > What is the trademarked goods and services class number? > US Serial Number: 7763427 US Registration Number: 365724 International Class: 9 US Classes: 021, 023, 026, 036, 038 All info is a

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Newbie on Sugar

2016-05-02 Thread Sean DALY
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > I suppose on Windows, Notepad+ is still the best choice. I haven't worked > on a Mac for twenty years and so - no help. FWIW, I like PSPad on Windows and TextWrangler on Mac OS, both have tools for coders. Sean ___

Re: [Sugar-devel] facebook verification

2016-05-02 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Samson, I looked and couldn't find any way to verify through the fb account I have Sean On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:25 PM, samson goddy wrote: > Hello, > I and Dave are doing the proposal to get the facebook page verified here > is the pull request from github. Sean i guess you have to appr

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > The site is hosted in github now [1], so we can accept pull requests (or > comments/issues) for changes. Could you please let us know what typos you > found? > > [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs > Ah hi Walter what's the best

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
... who can fix those? I am relieved to see that the press page survived at its permalink. Sean On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Hi > > On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY wrote: > >> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already. >

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Juan Carlos Murillo wrote: > Also, if there is a range of different colors for the logo, then a good > idea might be to use the same logo color for the websites that have more > related content between them (i.e. homepage and activities). I didn't realize the ex

Re: [Sugar-devel] Vision

2016-04-20 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:48 AM, James Cameron wrote: > > but I can not find any evidence that XP was - [...] - ever shipped > > by OLPC, [...] > > None. Windows XP required a PC architecture, which the early models > were capable of, and the systems were engineered, but there were no > customer

Re: [Sugar-devel] All Things Open

2016-04-19 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Tony, my impression is that All Things Open is more business-oriented... "in the enterprise" We don't have a vision or roadmap yet, which makes that a tight deadline. Sean P.S. "If" the conference will be maintained in NC... the new discriminatory legislation enacted there has created a back

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-19 Thread Sean DALY
Developer discussion about SL brand identity. Hopefully the MIT Sloan conclusions will be taken into account Sean -- Forwarded message -- From: Dave Crossland Date: Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37 AM Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign To: Juan Carlos Murillo Cc:

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-13 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > This new capability is intended to eliminate the need for cygwin No doubt MS likes any initiative against Red Hat. I think they want to simplify server administration in a mixed-OS environment from a Windows console (ssh, rsync and the li

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-13 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > I think users will still need to install and run an X server to run unix > GUI programs; but there are several good X servers for windows, so this > should be easy it's true that I can run some FLOSS GUI software using an X server on my

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-12 Thread Sean DALY
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Tony Anderson wrote: > One development that seems to be ignored on these lists is Microsoft's > announcement that it will support Bash on Windows 10. As I understand it, > the goal is to be able to run Ubuntu programs on Windows 10 using a > standard 'short-cut'.

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-12 Thread Sean DALY
pose the minimum build order is $2M. While those 1 laptops > are in inventory, they tie up the funds. When all of the laptops have been > paid for and deployed, a new order can be placed. Better would be to order > 20,000 units at $4M. Then when 10,000 have been deployed and paid

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] Action needed on two issues

2016-04-11 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Dave, the $2390 sum is for the following marketing/promotion/PR expense: eReleases CauseWire 10-pack Invoice #011413122 This was authorized by a SLOBs vote in late 2012. Prior to the pack, I was funding press releases on pay-as-you-go out of my pocket, and I wasn't able to continue that any m

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-09 Thread Sean DALY
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Finding ten ritzy private primary schools in the US where the parents can > drop $400 in a hat shouldn't be too hard for a savvy sales person I'd like to think that's so, but it may well be more likely that parents would be more impressed

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing][GSOC] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-08 Thread Sean DALY
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook > app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities)) > > Interesting thread and timely. I'm headed to SF (from DC) to attend the > Facebook Developer's Conference. There is a pre-conference workshop on > Monday for NGOs. I'll keep

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-08 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Lionel Laské wrote: > In my point of view Facebook is not a platform. But it's probably possible > to run Sugarizer (or a part of it) into the Facebook context. > > BTW I'm agree with Sean, it has sense only if we've got a marketing plan > to be there. > > The fir

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-08 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Does any one have an idea of the cost of 1000 32GB SD cards? >> > > I expect about $2,000, would need some more fishing about in > http://www.alibaba.com/Memory-Card_pid4406 but that is my impression. > > >> Perhaps, that could be added to t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-07 Thread Sean DALY
omputer-based learning tool? > * a cool guy interested in fun games? > > > Well it depends on how I feel > About facebook: > Sometimes "a cool guy interested in fun games". > > But "I used to" submit patches for sugar core. > I was a gci winner twice with

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-07 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:10 PM, samson goddy wrote: > I think that doing ads on facebook or twitter will be great. Samson... at the risk of repeating myself... who are the ads geared to? What do the ads say? Is the objective to boost random traffic on facebook, or traffic more likely to adopt

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-07 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:13 PM, samson goddy wrote: > a proposal of targeting more users via the social media (Facebook and > twitter). And i will submit it this week or next so we will know that to do. Great! So... what is our target or targets? What is our objective or objectives? What is ou

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-07 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Ignacio are you ...? * a donor interested in supporting a project to support financially? * a developer interested in a project to volunteer with? * a teacher interested in a classroom computer-based learning tool? * a parent interested in a home setting computer-based learning tool? * a cool

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar on Facebook app(Sugarizer)(sugar activities))

2016-04-07 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > One of the ideas of Sugar is to raise awareness about the software freedom > movement, and as such, providing the full experience within the facebook > police-state playpark is an own-goal. We should reach people where they are > in the play

Re: [Sugar-devel] The future of Sugar on XO-1s

2016-04-06 Thread Sean DALY
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > How many kids is Sugar targetting? > > Low millions? Or billions? > A few years ago, I estimated at around 10 million the number of teachers in classrooms with younger children, and I suggested we target them. Any teacher-friendly, ultrasi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Localization] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder

2016-04-01 Thread Sean DALY
Concerning marketing, In the past I funded nearly everything out of pocket including big-ticket items like the 100 USB sticks and of course travel but was unable to continue doing so when I reached $5000 of expenses. I did request and receive funding from the SLOBs for newswire press releases, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] DESIGN TEAM Assemblage

2016-02-16 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Ifeanyi Matthew, There hasn't been much marketing activity lately in the absence of a roadmap, funds, and developer resources. In the past the Design team assisted the Marketing team, for example: https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Booth_Banners in SL marketing, the most important v

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Twitter password recovering

2015-10-15 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Samson, I never used the twitter account and never knew the password myself Sean On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:58 PM, samson goddy wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I have been trying to reset the twitter page of the sugarlabs for the past > 1 month now. I discussed with Ignacio about resetting the p

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS

2015-07-21 Thread Sean DALY
Forwarding to SoaS list On Tuesday, July 21, 2015, David Leeming wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have familiarity with Sugar since working with OLPC from 2008, but I > haven’t been active in these communities for some time. I’m just refreshing > myself on current status of Sugar with a view to introd

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration

2015-07-01 Thread Sean DALY
in a couple of days ok On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Sean, > Could you reply? > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > >> Hi Samson, this is a copy/pasted form letter, the tipoff is they mention >> "company" whi

Re: [Sugar-devel] Collaboration

2015-07-01 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Samson, this is a copy/pasted form letter, the tipoff is they mention "company" which means they did not bother spending three clicks to find out about Sugar Labs. If their event is legit, we can always ask them if they will assist a nonprofit like us in attending, with travel, room & board :-)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-20 Thread Sean DALY
Thanks Peter, I was watching that too. If I understand correctly switching/changing the sections or adding an Activity is beyond tweaks? while text changes are tweaks. I'm quite happy with it, even though there are lots of changes we suggested which aren't in. I feel the only tweak still to make

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-19 Thread Sean DALY
Peter - here is Iain's document: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/attachments/20150519/bdaf00ca/attachment.html Sean On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > Gonzalo - Iain had already consolidated all changes but Peter doesn't want > to deal with a t

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-19 Thread Sean DALY
Gonzalo - Iain had already consolidated all changes but Peter doesn't want to deal with a text file. Sean On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Iain, Sean, Sam, > > _Please_consolidate_the_changes_before_send_to_Peter_. > > Peter, > when need this be finished? > > Gonzalo > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-19 Thread Sean DALY
ltimedia as it stands should be deleted. > > Regards, > > Iain > > > On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 09:29 +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > > thanks Iain looks good > > > > some typos: > > Wwork -> Work > > > > FotoToon -> OK is singular not plural &g

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-18 Thread Sean DALY
f. "office desktop") which probably came in from copy/pasted text should either be replacd with simple double parentheses (" ") or the HTML entities “ and ” thanks Sean On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Iain Brown Douglas < i...@browndouglas.plus.com> wrote: > On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-17 Thread Sean DALY
me up > with the final edits so I can submit them early next week as a single > final edit. > > Peter > > > > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Sean DALY wrote: > > Peter - are the intro edits I sent going in? > > thanks > > Sean > > > > > &

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] New Fedora Spins Site

2015-05-16 Thread Sean DALY
Peter - are the intro edits I sent going in? thanks Sean On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > It's already in process > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Sam P. wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > I think Walter send out a good copy [1] with headers - maybe we could use > > those

Re: [Sugar-devel] f22-spins page is being written and needs suggestions

2015-05-13 Thread Sean DALY
en the specific advantages of the Soas spin. many thanks Sean On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > See the post I just sent to the list less than a hour ago :-) > > Thanks Sean, > > Peter > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Sean DALY wrote: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] f22-spins page is being written and needs suggestions

2015-05-13 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Tom, Gonzalo had mentioned this, I have a rewrite of the introduction in the works and Sam's Activity texts are good. The main issue is explaining that SOAS Desktop is not a desktop (!) Peter is coordinating on the Fedora side. Sean On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Another little computer kickstarter

2015-05-08 Thread Sean DALY
The onboard composite video out is an interesting approach... can plug into old secondhand TVs with poor resolution, just like my first computer in 1983. Of course, when you add everything that's missing, you hit 10x the price, as you've seen before. And fragile cables/adapters all over the place.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

2015-05-08 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > You might laugh but when the OLPC Association was actively answering bids > for laptops, this dance happened all the time. Also known as "sales calls", never a strong point with FLOSS projects, and one of the reasons so many Intel Class

Re: [Sugar-devel] Community XO software builds

2015-05-06 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Tony not sure if this is helpful, but the Python script youtube-dl ( http://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/) is very useful for downloading vids from YouTube (curent/playlist/batch), and offers options such as --age-limit, --max-filesize, --rate-limit, --max-quality, and in particular --format worstv

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing alias

2015-05-06 Thread Sean DALY
+1 to Samson who seeks a more active presence for SL on social media. Sean. On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > +1 To Samson. > > I remember we explicitly proposed add one more member to the committee, > and Walter proposed try include a young hacker. > > Gonzalo > > On We

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] New try on a better sugarlabs site

2015-04-17 Thread Sean DALY
Dan - two years ago we arrived at 3 million by estimating 2.6 million XO laptops delivered, Sugar on Intel Classmates in Argentina (between 50K and 100K of the approximately 1.5 million locally assembled from 2011 - the others had been running Windows and may have been reconditioned to GNU/Linux),

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

2015-03-21 Thread Sean DALY
t; corporate sponsorship, perhaps) but in particular about what support > they would offer Sugarlabs towards our targets? > > Would there be a view against this idea? > > Regards, > > Iain > > On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 11:37 +0100, Sean DALY wrote: > > Yes, of course, w

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

2015-03-21 Thread Sean DALY
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > We can ask language and keyboard in the first boot as we do with age and > gender. > I think create and maintain a complete matrix of VMs will be more > difficult. > > Gonzalo > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:39 PM, S

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

2015-03-20 Thread Sean DALY
e aghast at the idea. > > Is still needed have a vm by host language/keyboard? > Or we can ask to the user using the same code from the Sugar control panel? > > Gonzalo > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:18 PM, James Cameron wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06

Re: [Sugar-devel] GSoC projects

2015-03-20 Thread Sean DALY
No the license was fine last time i checked - look at the section concerning nonprofit/educational use. Our plan had been to bundle Sugar prebuilt images with the Virtualbox installer. The real issue is the extensions which are separate from the installer for licensing reasons and must be loaded s

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Planning for the future (Samuel, Greenfeld)

2015-03-19 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Tony, I for one certainly don't feel Sugar is only for children in developed countries. I believe Sugar offers benefits for all children. I do think that widespread use of Sugar in developed countries would encourage its use in the developing world, for several reasons. One of these is the oppo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Planning for the future (Samuel Greenfeld)

2015-03-18 Thread Sean DALY
cc'ing the Marketing list - the one everyone forgets as soon as they discuss marketing. The MarketLab study we worked on back then confirmed what we already knew - that Sugar's websites did not accompany teachers interested in Sugar, and that Sugar absolutely needed a simple installer. They also a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mail subscription in sugar-devel interrupted

2015-03-17 Thread Sean DALY
I had been booted from both sugar-devel and IAEP, and although the sugar-devel reactivate link worked, that link didn't work for IAEP. Manually forcing it on the IAEP sub page fixed it. Sean On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Reporting here if is useful for others: > > I

Re: [Sugar-devel] SugarLabs.org new website - looking for opinions/ideas!

2015-03-01 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Tymon, I think it's great you have stepped up to rework the sl.o website. Christian who designed the original pages had worked on a new framework a while back, but we got bogged down trying to find usable (both attractive and legal) visuals of kids using Sugar. I have a typographical suggesti

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Fwd: admin of sugarlabs fb page

2014-04-25 Thread Sean DALY
know the community better and may be >> become interested and volunteer in :) >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Sean DALY wrote: >> >>> Puneet - what kind of messages do you have in mind? >>> >>> we've wanted someone to be on th

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Fwd: admin of sugarlabs fb page

2014-04-24 Thread Sean DALY
; Mike >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Sean DALY wrote: >> >> a worthy question >> >> -- Forwarded message -- >> From: Puneet Kaur >> Date: Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:41 PM >&

Re: [Sugar-devel] Parental controls (UPDATE)

2014-04-24 Thread Sean DALY
As a parent of three, and concerned about Internet dreck, I have found that parental control solutions at machine level fail because when kids are motivated enough, they will crack whatever technical solution is in place and moreover, will compare notes with all their fellow rebels. What has worked

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [b2g] Introducing B2G to x86

2014-02-27 Thread Sean DALY
WIPO's Romarin database contradicts you regarding the LEGO mark. LEGO vigorously defend infringement of their marks ( http://aboutus.lego.com/en-gb/legal-notice/fair-play). Sean On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Christian Stroetmann < stroetm...@ontolab.com> wrote: > On Thu, 27.02.2014 01:13,

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar tryout (was Re: sugarlabs.org redesign)

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
, it's > fine for techies. > * Start measuring conversion rate. I suspect we don't have a way to count > the number of users that managed to reach the Sugar home. But measuring > completed downloads would be a start. > * Gradually get rid of as many barriers as possible and

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar tryout (was Re: sugarlabs.org redesign)

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
nd bad, what is stopping us marketing Sugar this way really? > > > On Friday, 8 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote: > >> Not only doable, has been done for some time now [1,2] and is >> multi-platform (& what I use to demo Sugar on a Mac) >> >> The Oracle PUEL license

Re: [Sugar-devel] different perspectives

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:56 AM, David Farning wrote: > The highest rate of progress happens when the parties focus on getting > ahead of the other guys rather then when they focus on holding others > back. Progress tends to stop when one party gets so far ahead that it > is not worth it for others

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar tryout (was Re: sugarlabs.org redesign)

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
I believe Oracle GPL'd the code itself, as I remember it was the extension pack & installer that had licensing issues... in any case, topics for the SFC to help with Sean On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Sean DALY wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Sur] [IAEP] Sugar oversight board meeting

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
David - what I meant was, no strategic partnership between the distros. Ubuntu wouldn't pose so many difficulties if M. Shuttleworth/Canonical got behind Sugar for example. Sean On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:46 AM, David Farning wrote: > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Sean DALY wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] Sugar tryout (was Re: sugarlabs.org redesign)

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
ov 8, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > At least the virtualbox looks doable and a good way to show Sugar. > > Gonzalo > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > >> On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote: >>> >>> The larg

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0[ Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 43]

2013-11-08 Thread Sean DALY
). Here we are bumping when >> starting to work towards the goal instead. I don't see that as an issue, >> just need to be clear about it. >> >> So the proposal for next release is version 3.102. Thoughts? Is the >> rationale clear? Anyone unhappy with it? >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0

2013-11-07 Thread Sean DALY
> and of course, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning >>> >>> cheers, >>> Sameer >>> >>> > >>> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Daniel Narvaez >>> wrote: >>> >> What about calling it 1.102 (tech v

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0

2013-11-07 Thread Sean DALY
trabooks feels less anachronistic? :P). The hybrids that are hitting the >> market lately might not be mature, cheap or extremely popular, but it's an >> interesting direction to explore ... Keyboards are not completely dead >> yet IMO! >> >> On Thursday, 7 Novemb

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0

2013-11-07 Thread Sean DALY
et lately might not be mature, cheap or extremely popular, but it's an > interesting direction to explore ... Keyboards are not completely dead > yet IMO! > > On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote: > >> If we are talking about a version number that might make it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0

2013-11-07 Thread Sean DALY
me with any > > message attached... It would address the fact that we never released a > 1.0 > > without having PR consequences. Then when we figure out what 2.0 really > > means marketing wise, we can start releasing 2.x as you suggest... > > > > > > On Thursday

Re: [Sugar-devel] RFC: Make Sugar 0.102 = Sugar 1.0

2013-11-07 Thread Sean DALY
t releasing 2.x as you suggest... > > > On Thursday, 7 November 2013, Sean DALY wrote: > >> If we are talking about a version number that might make it into a press >> release at some point, this is a marketing discussion so I have cc'd the >> list. >> >>

  1   2   3   4   >