On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Aleksey Lim
alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:34:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 16 July 2011 12:44, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Since jabber.sl.o is targeiting for dev use cases and the fact that
everyday
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:00:54AM -0700, Sameer Verma wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Aleksey Lim
alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:34:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 16 July 2011 12:44, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Since
On 13 July 2011 21:52, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Ok. Though, my point is that jabber.sl.o uses preliminary prosody sugar
plugin and I'm improving it right now (and sugar code as well, will post
patches). Will setup jabber-devel.sl.o then.
Oh, now that's the first I've
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 13 July 2011 21:52, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Ok. Though, my point is that jabber.sl.o uses preliminary prosody sugar
plugin and I'm improving it right now (and sugar code as well, will post
patches). Will
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:04:12AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 13 July 2011 21:52, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Ok. Though, my point is that jabber.sl.o uses preliminary prosody sugar
plugin and I'm improving it right now (and sugar code as well, will post
patches). Will
On 16 July 2011 12:44, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Since jabber.sl.o is targeiting for dev use cases and the fact that
everyday resetting (/usr/share/ejjaberd) ejabberd data is not enough to
prevent kernel killing apps due to lack of memory, I installed prosody
for
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:34:21PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 16 July 2011 12:44, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
Since jabber.sl.o is targeiting for dev use cases and the fact that
everyday resetting (/usr/share/ejjaberd) ejabberd data is not enough to
prevent kernel
On 12 July 2011 14:26, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
#2963: Sugar telepathy code does not take into account presence status of
buddies
On a similar note though, Gabble could probably do with some
improvement here too. It is sending dbus broadcast signals for all
those buddies,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:22:09PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 12 July 2011 14:26, Aleksey Lim alsr...@activitycentral.org wrote:
#2963: Sugar telepathy code does not take into account presence status of
buddies
On a similar note though, Gabble could probably do with some
improvement
Hi all,
This kind of issues might (maybe ejabberd patch behaves like that)
be fixed on server side, but it sounds too ugly..
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 01:21:12PM -, Sugar Labs Bugs wrote:
#2963: Sugar telepathy code does not take into account presence status of
buddies
10 matches
Mail list logo
