As long as no one (including developers) is confused that SoaS
release 1( Strawberry) alias SoaS-2 is running Sugar v0.84 and
Fedora 11.
I'm just wondering why SoaS-2 is in use... non-initiates will assume
that means SoaS release 2 (Blueberry), don't you think?
thanks
Sean
On Mon, Sep 14,
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:17:42AM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
[non-release-naming issue]
Please take this to the mailing list to which it belongs:
sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org.
Bill Bogstad
Martin
pgpnUhR2RRAF1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
As long as no one (including developers) is confused that SoaS
release 1( Strawberry) alias SoaS-2 is running Sugar v0.84 and
Fedora 11.
I'm just wondering why SoaS-2 is in use... non-initiates will assume
that means
Sean DALY wrote:
Sebastian, what's your take? Can we retire SoaS-{1,2,3} or fold them
into the public v1, v2 numbers?
Okay, let me shed some light in here, though I think this has already
been discussed in length.
In the early days when I started working on SoaS, we still had internal
builds
Great thanks Gary!
Sean
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Gary C Martin g...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 12 Sep 2009, at 21:40, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's
Bill - I completely agree our numbering systems are byzantine and
difficult to grasp... there is the Sugar version number, the Fedora
version number, the OLPC-OS version number and the XO build number.
Our marketing strategy is to push Sugar on a Stick, so to simplify
that we picked the next
However internally we had been using Soas-1 and SoaS-2, if I'm not
mistaken to refer to the underlying Fedora distro (10 and 11
respectively). It's true that these numbers (or an SoaS-3 if it
exists) will be confusing compared to the public version number.
I believe SoaS-1 (strawberry) was
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
Bill - I completely agree our numbering systems are byzantine and
difficult to grasp... there is the Sugar version number, the Fedora
version number, the OLPC-OS version number and the XO build number.
The numbering is for
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 08:20:43PM -0400, Bill Bogstad wrote:
I've been watching this thread since it began and understand that from
a marketing perspective numbers are 'ugly'.
Numbers are for the developers, ice cream flavours are for the press /
GUI users, as I understand it.
On the other
Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to do a
classroom for Fedora.
Congratulations.
re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5 we'll use some other time
Very clear - thanks.
[Have
On 12 Sep 2009, at 21:40, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to
do a
classroom for Fedora.
Congratulations.
re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:30:30PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
re marketing course: in fact I have accepted Mel's invitation to do a
classroom for Fedora.
Congratulations.
re logos: Strawberry=6, Blueberry=4, and 5 we'll use some other time
Very clear - thanks.
[Have we agreed on Blueberry as
I've been watching this thread since it began and understand that from
a marketing perspective numbers are 'ugly'.
On the other hand, everyone seems to acknowledge that numbers make it
easier to track things from a development and
deployment support perspective. Obviously, that works best if the
I'm sorry Martin, I thought I was answering
No, there wasn't marketing decided, it was Tomeu who thought of
flavors, myself who thought of ice cream flavors (preferably fruit
since natural wholesome sugars, a fun treat for kids), and
sdziallas who agreed to the idea at the marketing meeting. I do
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:41:31AM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
I'm sorry Martin, I thought I was answering
You were but there's a lot of extra information that's sometimes hard
to parse - ultimately someone needs to put an image file in a
directory...so I was hoping that you would just say yes or no
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:33, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:41:31AM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
I'm sorry Martin, I thought I was answering
You were but there's a lot of extra information that's sometimes hard
to parse - ultimately someone needs to put
thanks Martin
in fact I often worry about talking too much during the marketing
meetings, others not getting a word in. I'd be delighted if
nonmarketing Sugar Labs team members lurked or participated, although
I have clear ideas about how to work on marketing puzzles I'll never
claim to have all
Hi Martin
The idea is ice cream flavors and Blueberry works since I had rollup
banners and posters made in both the Strawberry and Blueberry colors,
keeping them current for at least a couple of years (considering their
cost).
However, as stated previously it hasn't been our plan to name SoaS
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:10:40PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
Hi Martin
The idea is ice cream flavors
Ok. I hadn't picked up on this, despite being in the meeting when it
was mentioned[1]. I suspect others may not have, either.
and Blueberry works since I had rollup banners and posters made
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:04:33PM -0400, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
Thank you, I love this naming concept with fruit names.
I guess Sean's corrected you and I that it's ice-cream flavours :).
yet a couple snags I see, No blueberries (arandanos) I ever saw in
South/Cental America... (very
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0400, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
I guess Sean's corrected you and I that it's ice-cream flavours :).
If it's ice cream flavors, Vanilla and Chocolate are universal...
I guess I was assuming that there needs to be a tie-in between the
colour of the flavour and
In fact Martin if I remember correctly we had already discussed this
on-list... I will try to find the thread.
The idea is to maximize launch impact by keeping the element of
surprise on our side. This is also why the ice-cream shop doesn't
announce their summer specials in advance - people like
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 04:42:07PM -0400, Yamandu Ploskonka wrote:
I guess Sean's corrected you and I that it's ice-cream flavours :).
If it's ice cream flavors, Vanilla and Chocolate are universal...
I guess I was
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:57:00PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
In fact Martin if I remember correctly we had already discussed this
on-list... I will try to find the thread.
Please let me know. I did google for 'sugar ice cream soas' before
I said I couldn't find anything besides the IRC meeting I
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2009-June/001546.html
found it, was during a (sometimes heated) discussion concerning Sugar
vs. Sugar on a Stick, SoaS referring only to the Fedora distro or not,
and some other topics :-)
basically, a reread of the marketing meetings in June (and the
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:56:25PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:57:00PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote:
In fact Martin if I remember correctly we had already discussed this
on-list... I will try
26 matches
Mail list logo
