On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:12:13PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Ack-By: Sascha Silbe sascha-...@silbe.org
CU Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 05:20:42PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
diff --git a/config/modulesets/tools.modules
b/config/modulesets/tools.modules
index 715c640..88f0ac2 100644
--- a/config/modulesets/tools.modules
+++ b/config/modulesets/tools.modules
@@ -30,17 +30,12 @@
dep
On Sun, 2010-04-25 at 23:59 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
- distutils id=dogtail
-branch repo=fedorahosted/
-!-- sysdep: pyatspi --
- /distutils
NAK. Please don't remove the package itself, just the dependency in
meta-tools. We'll need it again in the future for UI testing.
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:19:09PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
But if I remove this, wouldn't jhbuild try to build xulrunner from
source?
No, since the only package depending on xulrunner (hulahop) is installed
from a distro package.
Or am I still misunderstanding how jhbuild thinks?
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 06:19:09PM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
...
[Hulahop]
Fedora has 0.7.1. Lucid does not seem to have it at all. Was the package
dropped or what?
Oh, you're right. I got
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 00:33 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Oh, you're right. I got confused by the many different Ubuntu releases;
hulahop is only included up to Karmic. They have dropped hulahop from
Lucid because it requires xulrunner and python-xpcom.
That reminds me I should request Sugar
xulrunner-python-devel: we don't need it at all
xulrunner-devel: not needed since we don't build hulahop from source
dogtail: only needed on systems that build evince
csound-devel: not needed since we don't build csound from source
Tested on Fedora 13, Fedora 12 and Ubuntu 10.04.
Signed-off-by:
7 matches
Mail list logo
