On 10/01/2011 01:32 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Excerpts from Paul Fox's message of 2011-09-29 14:38:35 +0200:
yes, it would be much better to centralize this -- we'll certainly be
going through this again in the future. please use olpc-hwinfo from
sugar, if possible.
Since we're talking about a
Excerpts from Paul Fox's message of 2011-09-29 14:38:35 +0200:
> yes, it would be much better to centralize this -- we'll certainly be
> going through this again in the future. please use olpc-hwinfo from
> sugar, if possible.
Since we're talking about a few lines of code only, I'd prefer the co
james wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:34:55AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > On 09/29/2011 03:46 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > >>'/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
> > >>check if the machin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:34:55AM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 09/29/2011 03:46 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >>'/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
> >>check if the machine is an XO in order to displ
On 09/29/2011 03:46 AM, James Cameron wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
'/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
check if the machine is an XO in order to display the
information accordingly.
Nak. compatible is the more correct prope
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> '/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
> check if the machine is an XO in order to display the
> information accordingly.
Nak. compatible is the more correct property in device-tree to use for
identifying X
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 06:24 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> '/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
>>> check if the machine is an XO in order to display t
On 09/28/2011 06:24 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
'/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
check if the machine is an XO in order to display the
information accordingly.
Can we finally agree to create a toolkit method f
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> '/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
> check if the machine is an XO in order to display the
> information accordingly.
Can we finally agree to create a toolkit method for this? As an
activity maintainer who need
'/ofw' has been removed on the XOs now. We need to refine the
check if the machine is an XO in order to display the
information accordingly.
Follow up patch of b454c1253d95fc62c0cdf9ce34c40397a3c6f49e
Signed-off-by: Simon Schampijer
---
extensions/cpsection/aboutcomputer/model.py | 46 +++
10 matches
Mail list logo
