On 18 January 2011 22:46, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Originally, there was no way to pin particular versions in collections.
One would always get the latest version flagged to work on your browser.
Which is exactly what you're asking for. I'm not sure what's currently
missing
Daniel,
Why not use the wiki like in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/10.1.3 ?
I know is more work maintain the version for every activity, but we can help
with this.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 18 January 2011 22:46, Bernie
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Daniel,
Why not use the wiki like in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/10.1.3 ?
I know is more work maintain the version for every activity, but we can
help with this.
This is not the best way to go, due to
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
raf...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.orgwrote:
Daniel,
Why not use the wiki like in
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/G1G1/10.1.3 ?
I know is more work maintain the
The wiki approach has been tried with
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities (which probably needs a bit of a
legal/deadlink/does not work with newer OSes/etc. cleanup) but ended up
a bit of a mess. I'm not certain if permissions would help much.
To split this page up properly in a wiki would
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:52 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
We already have that, in a different format, which works fine:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/services/update-aslo.php?id=ACTIVITYappVersion=0.90
And it sounds like this (plus pestering of activity authors and/or use
of admin power to
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:34:34PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 17:11 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
I can't. I think every maintainer must do the change.
Right every maintainer has to make that change in ASLO.
Aren't you an
On 18 January 2011 13:06, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Also, in my mind, ASLO is primarily a doer/user tool, so ASLO editors
should not change existed uploads in the way they think is needed.
I guess this means that my usage of activities.sugarlabs.org is not
according to its
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:48:05PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 18 January 2011 13:06, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
Also, in my mind, ASLO is primarily a doer/user tool, so ASLO editors
should not change existed uploads in the way they think is needed.
I guess this means that
On 18 January 2011 19:58, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
You can either do not use appVersion and update-aslo.php will return
recent versions or just create collection. The activity-testing.sl.o
implementation allows setting particular activity versions (it will be
pushed to
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:32 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
If I use a collection, the versions are fixed to the exact versions
that I add to the collection, whereas (see last mail) I want the
latest activity version compatible with Sugar-0.90.
(please correct me if I've misunderstood what a
On 18 January 2011 22:00, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
This wasn't considered good for deployments enough because it doesn't
allow the pedagogical team to do any QA on updates before they hit the
users.
Agreed. This is not for deployments, this is for development.
The downside
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:00:07PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 20:32 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
If I use a collection, the versions are fixed to the exact versions
that I add to the collection, whereas (see last mail) I want the
latest activity version compatible
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 22:06 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Perhaps we could add separate microformat URLs that
filter by Sugar version.
This would be good, but is basically what we have now in a different format:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:07:32PM +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
According to activities.sugarlabs.org, the following activities
(amongst others, probably) are not compatible with Sugar-0.90:
org.laptop.WebActivity
org.laptop.sugar.ReadActivity
org.laptop.TamTamSynthLab,
Hi,
According to activities.sugarlabs.org, the following activities
(amongst others, probably) are not compatible with Sugar-0.90:
org.laptop.WebActivity
org.laptop.sugar.ReadActivity
org.laptop.TamTamSynthLab,
org.laptop.TamTamJam,
org.laptop.TamTamEdit,
org.laptop.TamTamMini,
On 17 January 2011 21:07, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
According to activities.sugarlabs.org, the following activities
(amongst others, probably) are not compatible with Sugar-0.90:
If these activities do work on 0.90, please mark them as so.
Found a few more:
Daniel
I did a test with your image OS4,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Godiard/Activities_for_F14#Activities_test_in_OS4
Gonzalo
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 17 January 2011 21:07, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
According to
On 17 January 2011 21:17, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Daniel
I did a test with your image OS4,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Godiard/Activities_for_F14#Activities_test_in_OS4
Thanks, I assume you found some of the ones in my list to be working?
If so, please mark them as 0.90
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 17 January 2011 21:17, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Daniel
I did a test with your image OS4,
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Godiard/Activities_for_F14#Activities_test_in_OS4
Thanks, I assume you found
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 17 January 2011 21:17, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote:
Daniel
I did a test with your image OS4,
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 17:11 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
I can't. I think every maintainer must do the change.
Right every maintainer has to make that change in ASLO.
Aren't you an aslo admin? You can change any activity.
For the record, the current aslo
Hi
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.orgwrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 17:11 -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero wrote:
I can't. I think every maintainer must do the change.
Right every maintainer has to make that change in ASLO.
Aren't you an
23 matches
Mail list logo
