Re: [Sugar-devel] Better support for running non-sugar apps under Sugar (also pls sugarize aseprite) :-)

2014-03-12 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
I think adding standard applications to sugar will not be good, not for "purity" but because we lost many features from Sugar: consistency, the use of the Journal, the simple interface. In the practice, you can use Gnome to launch these apps (if they are not Sugarized) Is true we need reinvent a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Better support for running non-sugar apps under Sugar (also pls sugarize aseprite) :-)

2014-03-12 Thread Walter Bender
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > I know this topic has been discussed here more than once. > I feel there is a resistance because of a "purity" of design. I feel there is a resistance because no one has written the patch. (Patches welcome). > However it's a > bit silly t

[Sugar-devel] Better support for running non-sugar apps under Sugar (also pls sugarize aseprite) :-)

2014-03-11 Thread Sebastian Silva
I know this topic has been discussed here more than once. I feel there is a resistance because of a "purity" of design. However it's a bit silly that we need to reinvent everything because we have a thing for simplicity. For instance I'm doing a workshop with children and I'd have liked to use