This is just a quick note to let interested parties know that I've updated my
experimental repo at
http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/mstone/sugar
git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar
to sugar*-0.88.
For those who are curious, this repo:
* combines all six of the sugar, sugar-toolkit,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> This is just a quick note to let interested parties know that I've updated my
> experimental repo at
>
>http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/mstone/sugar
>git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar
Looks good. Even has my #897 fix
>On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
>> This is just a quick note to let interested parties know that I've updated my
>> experimental repo at
>>
>>http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/mstone/sugar
>>git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar
>
>Looks good. Even has my #
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:44:39AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> This is just a quick note to let interested parties know that I've updated my
> experimental repo at
>
>http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/mstone/sugar
>git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar
>
> to sugar*-0.88.
>
> For those
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:46:05PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> I particularly like that I can test sugar*-0.88 directly on my XO by running
> something comparable to
>
> yum install git-core gcc glibc-devel make vim
> git clone git://dev.laptop.org/users/mstone/sugar; cd sugar
> make xo-bu
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:46:05PM -040
On 28 April 2010 11:57, Michael Stone wrote:
> You couldn't find logs of the failure because olpc-dm is redirecting stdout
> and
> stderr to /dev/null.
I don't think this is true.
> Fortunately, olpc-utils rebuilds easily on the XO as soon as its builddep,
> ConsoleKit-devel, is installed.
>
>
Thanks, Michael, this has been the first viable method for getting Sugar
0.88 working on an XO-1.5 ... I'd been needing that for some time; to
check new bugs we find in 0.84 against 0.88, and to develop changes
against 0.88 after I've done them on 0.84.
The missing package was python-decorator. I
Thanks, Michael, this has been the first viable method for getting Sugar
0.88 working on an XO-1.5 ... I'd been needing that for some time; to
check new bugs we find in 0.84 against 0.88, and to develop changes
against 0.88 after I've done them on 0.84.
Double-apologies then for all the rough ed
On 4/28/10, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On 28 April 2010 11:57, Michael Stone wrote:
>> You couldn't find logs of the failure because olpc-dm is redirecting
>> stdout and
>> stderr to /dev/null.
>
> I don't think this is true.
I wrote from memory and, as you say, the details of what I wrote are
inaccu
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 02:07:50AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Double-apologies then for all the rough edges; since I never expected
> the work to be useful to anyone but me, I spent rather less time
> polishing it than is usual for me.
Well, stay in touch.
> I took a quick look at this traceba
11 matches
Mail list logo
