On 17.12.2011, at 11:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote:
>> I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would
>> be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and
>> review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sug
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote:
> I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would
> be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and
> review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming
> activity, after all...
I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be
nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and
review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming
activity, after all...
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Thomas C Gilliard <
satel...@
El 15/12/11 18:24, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn escribió:
>I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that
allowed people to find
>* unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities
>* activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to
be] under a fre
I tried to do this in :
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table#Activity_Test_Results
The criteria are listed at the top of the page.
This is a table matrix on the wiki in a sortable and editable form.
It is also unmaintained since Nov 2010...: (
Thus newer act
On 15 Dec 2011, at 21:55, Samuel Klein wrote:
> * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities
This one is quite a tough one, activities are distributed across a seemingly
grey continuum, from non-responding authors, to authors who release in time
with the Sugar release schedule
>I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that allowed
>people to find
>* unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities
>* activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be]
>under a free-software license
>* links to activities that are fr
I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that allowed
people to find
* unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities
* activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be]
under a free-software license
* links to activities that are freely avai
On 15 Dec 2011, at 17:44, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer.
+1
Activities without maintainers seem like a spiral to the bottom of the quality
bucket - I'd personally not want to recommend the ASLO site to a teacher if we
were knowing
But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer.
Gonzalo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva
wrote:
> Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await
> confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO
>
> El 14/12/11 1
Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await
confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO
El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
mailto:alan...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
It's o
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences,
> pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience.
> More info here:
>
>
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing
to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity
Ok. The "importants" are in ASLO.. mayb
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scratch there are in:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249
>
> But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/
>
> Was removed for a discussion about his License..
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing
to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Scratch there are in:
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249
>
> But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/
>
> Was removed for a discussion about his License..
Hi,
Scratch there are in: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249
But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/
Was removed for a discussion about his License..
There are some activities that not are in ASLO..
For example, all the activities that was in:
http://w
17 matches
Mail list logo
