On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git.
>
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4
>
> I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...
I've poked to see what the deal is, once we have
Weird. There is no tarball but the release has been tagged in git.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libxklavier/tag/?id=libxklavier-5.4
I wonder if they just forgot to upload the tarball...
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> >
> wro
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's
> required for the keyboard control panel section to work.
I've just checked this but presumably by 5.4 you mean an unreleased
version or SVC head because there is no 5.4
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 12:14 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 17 August 2013 12:03, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 17 August 2013 05:21, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>
> Adding in olpc-devel.
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez
On 17 August 2013 12:03, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> On 17 August 2013 05:21, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>
>> Adding in olpc-devel.
>>
>> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> > This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
>> > fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot
On 17 August 2013 05:21, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Adding in olpc-devel.
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
> > fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before
> > settling on a plan.
Sorry to those who receive this twice.
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 22:21 -0500, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Adding in olpc-devel.
>
> On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> > This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
> > fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you
Adding in olpc-devel.
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 03:34 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported
> fedora 18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before
> settling on a plan.
>
> * webkitgtk
>
>
>
> which drags in
>
>
> libso
This is based on the last sugar-build configuration which supported fedora
18. Note, I'm guessing a lot, you should give it a try before settling on a
plan.
* webkitgtk
which drags in
libsoup
glib
gobject-introspection
pygobject
dbus-python
* gwebsockets
* libxklavier (not needed on the XO acco
I think that having these packages on a publicly available repo would be of
great help, not only for testing but also for developing... I know that
maintaining specs and a building system sounds like headache now... but
what if we can split the work?
Daniel, how many system packages (aprox) are we
OLPC doesn't ship with cp-keyboard installed perhaps for testing on XOs
we could just patch that out at rpm generation like OLPC had done in the
past.
Jerry
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 02:17 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's
> required f
By the way I think libxklavier 5.4 is not even in Fedora 19 but it's
required for the keyboard control panel section to work.
On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There are
> almost certainly more deps. (We really need
Perhaps just listing them somewhere in sugar-docs and updating them
whenever they are discovered or intentionally bumped would be useful.
On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There are
> almost certainly more deps. (We
>From memory gwebsockets 0.3, libxklavier 5.4, webkitgtk 2.0.x. There are
almost certainly more deps. (We really need to start tracking our
dependencies more systematically but it's tricky).
On Saturday, 17 August 2013, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 10:57 +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> It would be nice but I think it would involve a non trivial amount of
> work to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the sugar rpms, there
> are system dependencies that would need to be built... latest
> libxklavier and webkitgtk comes
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> +1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0
> In this way we can isolate for other changes on the distro,
> for every change in Fedora version, there are broken pieces,
> we learned that...
Do we have all the dependencies for that? At least for
It would be nice but I think it would involve a non trivial amount of work
to do it properly. It's not just rebuilding the sugar rpms, there are
system dependencies that would need to be built... latest libxklavier and
webkitgtk comes to my mind, but there is probably more.
On 15 August 2013 05:1
+1 This would be great!
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> +1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0
> In this way we can isolate for other changes on the distro,
> for every change in Fedora version, there are broken pieces,
> we learned that...
>
> Gonzalo
>
>
> On Wed, Aug
+1 to have rpms to install over 13.2.0
In this way we can isolate for other changes on the distro,
for every change in Fedora version, there are broken pieces,
we learned that...
Gonzalo
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, James Cameron wrote:
> Yes, an image or a procedure for retrofit of 13.2.0
Yes, an image or a procedure for retrofit of 13.2.0 please.
I think a retrofit might provide for wider testing. A set of RPMs to
download and install, then reboot?
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:28:14PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Being an OLPC list perhaps it's better to wait we have a XO image
Being an OLPC list perhaps it's better to wait we have a XO image before
posting there?
On 14 August 2013 15:26, Chris Leonard wrote:
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
>
> Includes the Fabulous New Zealand testing crew!
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> >
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
Includes the Fabulous New Zealand testing crew!
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Where is the testing list?
>
>
> On 14 August 2013 15:05, Chris Leonard wrote:
>>
>> I'll forward to L10n list. Daniel, please repost to testing lis
Where is the testing list?
On 14 August 2013 15:05, Chris Leonard wrote:
> I'll forward to L10n list. Daniel, please repost to testing list!
>
> cjl
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard
> wrote:
> > May be we can organize a triage session next week,
> > and try to communicate s
I'll forward to L10n list. Daniel, please repost to testing list!
cjl
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> May be we can organize a triage session next week,
> and try to communicate so openly as we can?
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I will not be able to make it but it certainly sounds like a good idea.
On 14 August 2013 13:45, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> May be we can organize a triage session next week,
> and try to communicate so openly as we can?
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez
> wrote:
> >
May be we can organize a triage session next week,
and try to communicate so openly as we can?
Gonzalo
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if you want to help out to make 0.100 a release we can be proud of, there is
> something for everyone, developers and not.
>
Hello,
if you want to help out to make 0.100 a release we can be proud of, there
is something for everyone, developers and not.
* Bug fixing
Go to http://bugs.sugarlabs.org click on the "0.100 must fix" link and have
fun. More bugs will be added to the list as triage progress, but there is
alrea
27 matches
Mail list logo
