Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 36 SoaS ISO spin beta ready for testing

I gave it a quick series of tests (on the airplane -- didn't save the logs, unfortunately) (1) the Journal is throwing errors on all writes so no activities could save (2) Physics activity had an error trying to create objects (3) Abacus displays odd formatted numbers on the beads (b'5') (4) I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

I'm still trying to figure out how that happened and I'll try taking a look when I can. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 9:00 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:40 AM Alex Perez wrote: > > > > There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 1:40 AM Alex Perez wrote: > > There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso > which I have confirmed is working as expected. > > The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. Great, do we know why/how this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

Great job guys!!! On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 8:40 PM Alex Perez wrote: > There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at > http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso > which I have confirmed is working as expected. > > The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. > > Chihurumnaya

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fix Startup issue with F35 SOAS

There's a fixed Fedora 35 SoaS ISO at http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-F35-20220211.iso which I have confirmed is working as expected. The above ISO is 1.2 gigabytes in size. Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote on 2/9/2022 12:37 PM: Hi Everyone, A fix for the fail to start

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Announcement: Sugar on a Stick (SoaS) 34 released today

On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:42 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > Fedora 34 was released today, which means that we've got a new release > of Sugar on a Stick 34, which includes Sugar 0.118, and can be > downloaded from: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Call for testing of Fedora 34 beta Sugar On A Stick

> This is a call for testing of the upcoming Fedora 34 based Sugar on a Stick, > which is now ready for testing on the following platforms: > > For 64-bit PCs, the ISO can be downloaded from: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora has been branched, SoaS LiveUSB environment is up for testing

James, James Cameron wrote on 2/10/21 1:45 PM: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:48:30PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: >> Folks, >> >> The Fedora 34 branch has happened, and there's a nightly build of SoaS, >> based on Fedora 0.118, which I'd like to call on folks to test. There's >> one known big bug,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar-starchart, flipsticks, labyrinth in Fedora Rawhide fails to install due to no python3 activity port

Thanks for testing. For StarChart, the latest release is for Python 2. Work on a port to Python 3 was begun but not completed. https://github.com/sugarlabs/starchart/pull/8 For Flip Sticks, the latest release is for Python 3, but Fedora project is not yet packaging that release. I suggest

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Thanks for testing, can you share a log of the activity after it fails to start? -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:17 AM Alex Perez wrote: > I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as > expected/desired, with session

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Thanks for testing! On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 06:17:42PM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as > expected/desired, with session auto-login. All activities start _except_ > FotoToon. > > Downloaded from

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

I tested today's nightly rawhide of SoaS, and can confirm it behaves as expected/desired, with session auto-login. All activities start _except_ FotoToon. Downloaded from 

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Edit made, changes can be viewed in the SoaS download page . -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:07 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam > wrote: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > SOAS was failing to build in F34 due to telepathy-salut being deprecated and > needed as a dependency in sugar, F33 beta had an issue where startup goes > straight to login. > > Both have been fixed after today's

[Sugar-devel] SOAS 33/34 Changes.

Hi Everyone, SOAS was failing to build in F34 due to telepathy-salut being deprecated and needed as a dependency in sugar, F33 beta had an issue where startup goes straight to login. Both have been fixed after today's compose was released and can be tested. Download here

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS username & password

I noticed the wiki recommending F33 some days ago and it shouldn't until the issue gets fixed. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 4:13 AM James Cameron wrote: > Given this problem, I don't know how it happened that Sugar Labs is > recommending F33.

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS username & password

Given this problem, I don't know how it happened that Sugar Labs is recommending F33. Should the Wiki page edits be reverted? Or is it only specific architectures affected? https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Sugar_on_a_Stick/Downloads=5913=103778=103653

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS username & password

Yes it's a bug in F33 SOAS and it's been looked at, you can download F32 SOAS here https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/32/Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-32-1.6.iso On Wed, Nov 4, 2020, 3:30 AM Walter Bender wrote: > There is no default username/password, you should

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS username & password

There is no default username/password, you should have been prompted to create one on install.How did you build it/ install it? On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 11:40 AM Angelo Danio wrote: > > Dear, > Started SoaS I landed on those screen asking user name and password and I’m > not able to find on

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

Correct, this is a function of multiple audio outputs, and how they are enumerated. I have verified that SoaS boots and runs, with sound and no changes required, on an old iMac5,2, form 2007. As an aside, this is one of those weird Apple-manufactured 32-bit EFI machines (but 64-bit CPUs).

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

Good, that makes it not-Sugar. Get it fixed on Workstation is your best bet. I've seen this kind of thing happen with laptops that have HDMI output capability. Audio is being clocked out a disconnected port. Sugar predates PulseAudio. Sugar has no support for anything other than ALSA. An

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fwd: Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick is available now!

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 4:11 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > > Fedora 32 has been released, and the Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick spin is > available for download from https://bit.ly/F32-SoAS-x86_64-ISO. It is 950 > megabytes in size. > > The 32-bit Fedora SoaS ARM image, suitable for use on Raspberry Pi

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:20:57AM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:18 PM James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > > I've opened [2]https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4998 and attached the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS 32 is silent?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:25:28PM -0400, Frederick Grose wrote: > I've opened https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4998 and attached the > zipped logs from some test sessions. Thanks. I've reviewed the logs. They show successful playback by GStreamer into a sound sink of some sort, but no

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Final is GO, SoaS Release Candidate ISO available immediately

Frederick, Chances are, with the sound problem, that this is a system/Fedora specific problem, and has nothing to do with Sugar. You can test this hypothesis by downloading a different spin of RC1.6, for example the LXDE Live ISO, and test sound there.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick beta ISO ready for testing

> Fedora 32 has entered beta state, and the Sugar on a Stick beta ISO (size is > 1 gigabyte) can be downloaded from http://bit.ly/SoaS-F32-Beta-ISO > > One known issue is that the IRC activity fails to start, and can not be used, > as it's not yet been ported to Python 3. There's currently 4

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...] > > > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...] > > > > > > As far as I can see all those deps are there. > > > > > > I see the following crash: > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): [...] > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:23:13PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, [...] > > Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. [...] > > As far as I can see all those deps are there. > > I see the following crash: > > Traceback (most

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

> > Log (41) - Fails on start-up with AttributeError, ideally should be > > ported to python 3. > > No, v41 is Python 3 already, and should work. Does work on Ubuntu > 20.04 beta. Sounds like you have a Fedora specific error to diagnose. > > The dependencies are unusual for this activity; check

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:35 AM James Cameron wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:57:56AM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:34 PM James Cameron wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:40:04AM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > > > > Testing with the following nightly SoaS

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 12:57:56AM +0100, Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:34 PM James Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:40:04AM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > > > Testing with the following nightly SoaS Live ISO, > > > Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-32-20200222.n.0.iso, the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 9:34 PM James Cameron wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:40:04AM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > > Testing with the following nightly SoaS Live ISO, > > Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-32-20200222.n.0.iso, the following results > > were observed: > > Thanks for testing. > > My

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 32 Sugar on a Stick (0.116) status/testing

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 11:40:04AM -0800, Alex Perez wrote: > Testing with the following nightly SoaS Live ISO, > Fedora-SoaS-Live-x86_64-32-20200222.n.0.iso, the following results > were observed: Thanks for testing. My answers below are on the assumption that Python 2 is not being provided by

Re: [Sugar-devel] soas build failure...f32 rawhide

On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 06:21:53PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > On 11/19/19 1:58 PM, James Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3215/39103215/livemedia-out.log > > > nothing provides

Re: [Sugar-devel] soas build failure...f32 rawhide

On 11/19/19 1:58 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3215/39103215/livemedia-out.log nothing provides python3-telepathy needed by sugar-0.116-1.fc32.noarch so soas did not build.. Caused by

Re: [Sugar-devel] soas build failure...f32 rawhide

On 11/19/19 1:58 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3215/39103215/livemedia-out.log nothing provides python3-telepathy needed by sugar-0.116-1.fc32.noarch so soas did not build.. Caused by

Re: [Sugar-devel] soas build failure...f32 rawhide

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:32:27PM -0800, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3215/39103215/livemedia-out.log > > nothing provides python3-telepathy needed by sugar-0.116-1.fc32.noarch so > soas did not build.. Caused by switching Requires from

[Sugar-devel] soas build failure...f32 rawhide

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3215/39103215/livemedia-out.log nothing provides python3-telepathy needed by sugar-0.116-1.fc32.noarch so soas did not build.. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] soas and fesco

17:18:14 satellit_ 17:18:17 Yep. 17:18:21 Python 2 exception: sugar desktop environment  https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2267 17:18:21 i was thinking of adding something more direct, like "what's you opinion on modularity", but it would transform fesco voting into vote on topics 17:19:09

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:22 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > I looked at the sugar repo in the fedora sources repository and noticed that > the sugar version is still v0.114, > I'm not good with packaging but I can help apply patches up to the latest > version - v0.116 -, I'd like to know >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

I looked at the sugar repo in the fedora sources repository and noticed that the sugar version is still v0.114, I'm not good with packaging but I can help apply patches up to the latest version - v0.116 -, I'd like to know how applying patches works. Thanks. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 09:53:31AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 6:00 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > > Thanks. Tested on the OLPC Infinity and also QEMU. No great > > surprises. Seems ready for release. Summary of observations; > > > > - it's Sugar 0.114, obsolete now,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 6:00 AM James Cameron wrote: > > Thanks. Tested on the OLPC Infinity and also QEMU. No great > surprises. Seems ready for release. Summary of observations; > > - it's Sugar 0.114, obsolete now, Yes, but pre beta when I had to deal with the release it was the latest

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

Thanks. Tested on the OLPC Infinity and also QEMU. No great surprises. Seems ready for release. Summary of observations; - it's Sugar 0.114, obsolete now, - default microphone level is really low, - the Moon activity is surprisingly and repeatedly sluggish to start, leaving two blank

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora 31

Awesome, I am downloading it now. On Fri, Oct 18, 2019, 9:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi All, > > Just a reminder we're in final freeze for Fedora 31, I'm assuming > people are testing it. > > Just a reminder you can get the latest nightly composes here: > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:48:26AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:02 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 08:41:32AM -0700, Alex Perez wrote: > > > Forwarding an abridged version of Peter's response to the SoaS ML for > > > completeness, and so we can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] The plan moving forward for SoaS with Fedora 31 and Fedora 32

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:02 AM James Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 08:41:32AM -0700, Alex Perez wrote: > > Forwarding an abridged version of Peter's response to the SoaS ML for > > completeness, and so we can continue the conversation there. > > Thanks. Interesting. > > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

References: > >> > >> [1] > >> https://fedorapeople.org/~pwhalen/soas/initramfs-5.0.9-301.fc30.armv7hl.img > >> [2] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_30#not_working > >> ___ > >> Sugar-devel mailing lis

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 30 SoaS (Sugar on A Stick) final released

On 4/30/19 8:05 AM, Walter Bender wrote: On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Alex Perez > wrote: The Fedora 30 release was earlier today, and with it comes the Fedora 30 Sugar on a Stick environment, which now has functional collaboration, out of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 30 SoaS (Sugar on A Stick) final released

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:07 PM Walter Bender wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:58 AM Alex Perez wrote: >> >> The Fedora 30 release was earlier today, and with it comes the Fedora 30 >> Sugar on a Stick environment, which now has functional collaboration, out of >> the box. It includes

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Fedora 30 (Release Candidate 1) SoaS images ready for testing

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 6:28 PM Alex Perez wrote: > > Folks, > > > Just under the wire, we have managed to get some critical Sugar on a Stick > issues fixed, which are now included in Fedora 30 SoaS images. I would like > to extend a very special thanks to Peter Robinson, who took time out of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

I've not recently tested the Sugar collaboration stack with Fedora, my testing has been on Ubuntu. But you're right on with the process to use; once they are able to communicate over a common TCP/ip network that relays mDNS UDP broadcast packets, an icon for each instance should appear in

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 10:28 +0100, Samson Goddy wrote: > Yes, we did. Upgraded metacity and Sugar, also made changes to the > ~/profile.py > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 10:26 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of > > issues have been fixed with

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

Yes, we did. Upgraded metacity and Sugar, also made changes to the ~/profile.py On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 10:26 AM Peter Robinson Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of issues have > been fixed with Fedora 29 updates. > > Peter > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Samson Goddy

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Errors from Soas 29

Have you applied all the latest updates to Fedora, a number of issues have been fixed with Fedora 29 updates. Peter On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:52 AM Samson Goddy wrote: > Hello, > > Ibiam and I are currently working to install Sugar in the classroom, so we > decided to download Soas 32-bit

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

I will be willing to test too. On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 8:26 AM, Samson Goddy wrote: > I am willing to test. > > I have Some running on my computer. > > > Regards > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 4:36 AM James Cameron >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:12:05AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > Hey James, >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Thanks Samson. We don't have any RPMs of the Python 3 branches or pull requests. You would need to run Fedora, remove Sugar packages from the system, and then install Sugar from each component source using the autogen, configure, make, make install sequence. Best to do this in a virtual

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

I am willing to test. I have Some running on my computer. Regards On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 4:36 AM James Cameron On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:12:05AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hey James, > > > > Happy New Year! > > > > > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:12:05AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hey James, > > Happy New Year! > > > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > > > >> that still depend on it.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hey James, Happy New Year! > > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > > > > >> Are there any plans to

[Sugar-devel] Soas Fedora_29 VirtualBox appliance

Download and import this appliance in VirtualBox (OS agnostic) final release with Sugar 0.112 * root password=sugarroot * user=sugar password=sugaruser not started - Users Sugar Id is not yet set 16-GB dynamic VirtualBox hard disc 2048 memory English and English

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Help soas is not building in fedora30 rawhide

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:41 PM James Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Frederick Grose wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:03 PM Thomas Gilliard > > wrote: > > > > > > Helpsoas is not building in fedora30 rawhide > > > > The livemedia.log shows this error

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Help soas is not building in fedora30 rawhide

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:23:44PM -0500, Frederick Grose wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:03 PM Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > > > Helpsoas is not building in fedora30 rawhide > > The livemedia.log shows this error report: Thanks for finding that, I had no idea where it would be. > ... >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

> > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > > > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 > > > > Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been > > retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not > > 100% sure that is the case but we might need to change

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Update Pootle

G'day, Thanks for your suggestion. You are right; updating Pootle may make this better. I'm not certain it will, but it may. Pootle is used by more than soas, so the soas mailing list is not the best place to discuss. Please subscribe to and use sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org instead. Also

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 03:35:06PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:11 PM Frederick Grose wrote: > > > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 > > Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been > retired

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Bug: Network control panel fails to open

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:11 PM Frederick Grose wrote: > > There is a glitch observed in SoaS 29. > https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4990 Seems it might use NetworkManager-glib and that appears to have been retired and we didn't have an explicitly dependency on it. I'm not 100% sure that is the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

What tasks (if any) can we assign to Google Code-in from this list? On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:50 PM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > > > working on the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > > > later. > > > > > > Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > > later. > > > > Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> > What's the status of the 0.113/114 releases? I'd like to start to > > working on the python3 builds for Fedora 30 sooner rather than > > later. > > Stalled on sugar-toolkit-gtk3 port from static to PyGObject > introspection for Telepathy. > > There's still no Python 3 support for the static

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 07:51:52PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > > >> that

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > > >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:00:11PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and > >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities > >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. > >> Are there

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

>> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and >> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities >> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here. >> Are there any plans to move them to gst1? > > They were moved. Check the release

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:43 AM, James Cameron wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: >> Hi all, >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi Peter, >> > >> > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 >> > >> > 2) There

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:08:48AM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:52 AM James Cameron wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. > > > > > > I've not

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:52 AM James Cameron wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. > > > > I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also > > doesn't tend to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hello All, > > This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback. > > I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also > doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major > problem, we glue it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > Hi all, > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam > wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 > > > > 2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

There's a plan to release all ported activities. -- Ibiam Chihurumnaya On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:26 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > Hi all, > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam > wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 > > > > 2)

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:26 PM Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > Hi all, > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam > wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 > > > > 2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to > > gtk3

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hi all, On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:18 PM Chihurumnaya Ibiam wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 > > 2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to gtk3 > and more will follow. > I saw some PRs to port activities to gtk3, but not sure

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Hi Peter, 1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0 2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to gtk3 and more will follow. 4) There's an ongoing port of the sugar gtk3 toolkit to python3 and it'll get to other parts of sugar soon. I'd love to assist, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

Thomas, the "had to press f1-f3" is tracked here; https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/issues/769 On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 06:17:48PM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > Installed medawriter usb branched everything netinstall of workstation today > to ext usb Hd > Then did dnf groupinstall of

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar 0.112 on Fedora 28 SoaS

Installed medawriter usb branched everything netinstall of workstation today to ext usb Hd Then did dnf groupinstall of sugar-desktop-environment. Bubble background. Sugar was 0.112 when selected in gdm. Had to press f1-f3 to get out of journal to f3 home on first start. (Known bug ) > On Mar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:50 PM, James Cameron wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Thu,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 11:36:13AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote: > >> > On

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:19 PM, James Cameron wrote: > Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) > > Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. > > viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm > >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

Everybody is talking not listening. Listen up. ;-) Frederick showed traceback from shell.log which said viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing. viewhelp_webkit2.py is missing from sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm viewhelp_webkit2.py was added by sugar-0.110.0-5.fc27.src.rpm sugar-dropWebKitGtk3.patch

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SoaS Fedora 27 beta fails to launch Sugar session

On 10/26/2017 01:29 PM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:00:11AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:54 AM, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:24 AM, James

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:46 AM, David Leeming wrote: > Hi, > > Well my old Toshiba laptop for instance, a Qosmio i7, a few years old but was > a $2000 laptop when new. On this I can't boot and run SOAS. It never > completes booting, you go through the name, colour,

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

rt intervention. Regards, Iain > David > > > -Original Message- > From: qu...@laptop.org [mailto:qu...@laptop.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2015 11:05 a.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: s...@lists.sugarlabs.org; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

15 10:58 a.m. > To: Development of live Sugar distributions > Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Hi David, > > I'm the SoaS maintainer. > >> I want to demonstrate SOAS to teachers in Vanuatu. I would like to be more >

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

...@lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto: > sugar-devel-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Peter Robinson > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 July 2015 10:58 a.m. > > To: Development of live Sugar distributions > > Cc: Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS]

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

ists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS > > G'day David, > > The stability problems you describe are not SOAS or Linux, but rather > hardware. We find Sugar, SOAS, or Linux very stable when used on > known good hardware or in emulation on known good hardwa

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

@lists.sugarlabs.org; s...@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS G'day David, The stability problems you describe are not SOAS or Linux, but rather hardware. We find Sugar, SOAS, or Linux very stable when used on known good hardware or in emulation on known good hardware. Emulation won't

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

distributions; Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown Douglas Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS Hi David, Sorry, this seem to have fallen through the cracks. > Iain referred me to a Fedora community where LinuxliveUSB installer was > recommended and it works just fine. It also installs a Linux em

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

r 2015 8:04 p.m. > To: David Leeming > Cc: Development of live Sugar distributions; Sugar-dev Devel; Iain Brown > Douglas > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS > > Hi David, > > Sorry, this seem to have fallen through the cracks. > > > Iain referred me to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [SoaS] SOAS

sugarlabs.org; s...@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [SoaS] [Sugar-devel] SOAS > > G'day David, > > The stability problems you describe are not SOAS or Linux, but rather > hardware. We find Sugar, SOAS, or Linux very stable when used on > known good hardware or in emulation o

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >