Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > Hi! > > Its been 2 weeks since this thread was last updated; has anything else > happened to move the proposal forward? Am I right that this will be decided > on at the next SLOB meeting? > > Samson, some more questions

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

I worked with Samson to refine a narrower proposal that has been presented to the SLOB by email. It is for the SLOB or Samson to decide how / when to share it with the wider community. It is for the SLOB to determine the how / when of discussing the proposal. I am confident that all details

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

> From: cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 02:24:21 -0400 > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs > To: d...@lab6.com > CC: samsongo...@hotmail.com; s...@unleashkids.org; > sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org; samsongo...@gmail.com; > sl...@li

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

To many cc:s is getting this moderated. Trying again. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Its been 2 weeks since this thread was last updated; has anything else >>

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

To many cc:s is getting this moderated. Trying again. On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Chris Leonard wrote: > I worked with Samson to refine a narrower proposal that has been > presented to the SLOB by email. It is for the SLOB or Samson to > decide how / when to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

James, I am not sure how NIH fits. I am completely new to the SLOBs and have had very little involvement with the translations program. I got assigned this task by the SLOBs at my first meeting in February. My point, clearly, is that this proposal needs to be evaluated by the TCM, in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

Sounds like an NIH, not invented here, response. Very negative. If there are concerns, engage an independent local auditor to do due diligence on the proposal. On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:23:59PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > It would be nice to give Chris Leonard a chance to be involved in >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

It would be nice to give Chris Leonard a chance to be involved in this decision. According to Samson, Schlumberger deployed 3000 XO laptops as part of a SEED program which has been discontinued. The laptops were given to individual students and so are no longer used at any of the three

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

I've reviewed the proposal. I like it. I've no further questions. On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:01:44PM +0100, samson goddy wrote: > Thank you very much Laura for the help you've giving me about my project in > Nigeria. Also i also grateful to Walter and Chris for their support too. I > have >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

Hi Samson Great proposal - and glad to hear you are feeling better :) I have 2 questions :) 1. You write in the proposal, the reason why the Yoruba was the most expensive, was because the logistics Portable internet and internet plan was included, two laptop was included too. I am curious

Re: [Sugar-devel] Samson's proposal to SLOBs

Hi Samson, 2016-04-05 22:01 GMT+08:00 samson goddy : > Thank you very much Laura for the help you've giving me about my project > in Nigeria. Also i also grateful to Walter and Chris for their support too. > I have been really down last week(Sick) but i am getting on my