On 08/11/2009 03:42 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:02:10AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
On 08/06/2009 04:59 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 08/06
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:02:10AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> > On 08/06/2009 04:59 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> >> On 08/06/2009 03:37 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>> >>> On Thu, Aug
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 08:02:10AM -0400, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > On 08/06/2009 04:59 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> >> On 08/06/2009 03:37 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Simon Schampijer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 08/06/2009 04:59 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 08/06/2009 03:37 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Simon Schampijer
>>> wrote:
On 07/31/2009 05:14 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at
On 08/06/2009 04:59 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 08/06/2009 03:37 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Simon Schampijer
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/31/2009 05:14 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Aleksey Lim
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009
On 08/06/2009 03:37 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> On 07/31/2009 05:14 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Aleksey Lim
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 07/31/2009 05:14 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Aleksey Lim
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer
w
On 07/31/2009 05:14 PM, Eben Eliason wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Another question that came up today:
Should the activity too
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> > Another question that came up today:
>> >
>> > Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default?
>> > D
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 02:05:48PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> > Another question that came up today:
> >
> > Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default?
> > Disabled by default?
>
> Maybe we could use the max_partici
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 13:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Another question that came up today:
>
> Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default?
> Disabled by default?
Maybe we could use the max_participants property to know when to
disable the button?
Regards,
Tomeu
> a) t
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 01:47:33PM +0200, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default?
> Disabled by default?
I have a vague recollection that sharing was planned to be implemented
using VNC for activities that do not implement their own sharing.
Another question that came up today:
Should the activity toolbar contain the "share" option by default?
Disabled by default?
a) the sharing button should be optional
erikos: I guess in case of a) we can follow old behaviour - by
default all buttons are enabdled, dev is free to hide() them
al
13 matches
Mail list logo