Thanks.
Some of the discussion is also found in the issues list of our GSoC
repository [1], (register a GitHub account and you can mark it as
watched [2]), and some discussion also happens on Gitter [3] or IRC.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/issues
https://github.com/sugarlabs/GSoC/watchers
Hi,
The jupyter notebook seems like a good idea. Since it gives a lot of
capabilities for the instructors to create interactive textual content.
Evaluating on the time, I think it is very much achievable in a summer. Are
you guys planning to take that ahead. If yes, I am also willing to
James Cameron wrote:
> You replied to me, but that wasn't me you quoted, it was Rahul.
Ya, I know. I just replied to all.
> However, it would be wrong
> to set expectations of colourful software by adding lots of colour to
> the web site.
I just meant to update the color palette, never to have
Amaan Iqbal wrote:
> > I don't expect revamping a website to be a _goal_.
>
> Without a proper website with the latest content, how can we expect
> the activities to reach the audience?
You replied to me, but that wasn't me you quoted, it was Rahul.
At the moment activities generally reach the
> I don't expect revamping a website to be a _goal_.
Without a proper website with the latest content, how can we expect the
activities to reach the audience?
> Even if we add a project for improving the website, 2 years down the line
> we might again face a similar email pointing out the
Thanks. But my vote is no.
It's not three months of coding.
It doesn't solve a problem we have with our software products; Sugar,
activities, Music Blocks, or Sugarizer.
Our problem with the web site is with the content, in turn because we
have had few content producers, and too many people
Greetings,
So I’ve been making a couple research about this for while now,
visiting several orgs that does something similar us @samswag helped
with some links, all in the attempt to give our website what it take
to be entertaining and highly engaging, relate a lot more with our
targeted audience
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:47 PM Samson Goddy
wrote:
> Sugar Labs Social was never a GSoC project, I don't understand why
> you keep bringing it up
Thanks, I know. I simply pointed that it never reached deployment,
though I'm sure people working on it even as we speak.
> Any "coding" project
My two cents re GSoC: from the very beginning of our involvement, I have
thought of it as an opportunity for us to take some risks and explore new
ideas. That being said, it is incumbent upon us to provide good mentoring
and follow through.
-walter
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:18 PM Samson Goddy
Just for some point of correction.
Sugar Labs Social was never a GSoC project, I don't understand why you
keep bringing it up. Any "coding" project that is related to Sugar Lab's
goals or leads to improvement to the mission is eligible as a Gsoc project.
Some project requires more than 3
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 7:44 PM Amaan Iqbal
wrote:
> I see we only have 6 projects so far in our Ideas list in comparison to
11
> which were selected in GSoC last year. Being a successful Open Source
> organization, I sincerely hope we have the potential of having many more
> projects in
Hello,
I see we only have 6 projects so far in our Ideas list in comparison to 11
which were selected in GSoC last year. Being a successful Open Source
organization, I sincerely hope we have the potential of having many more
projects in GSoC this year(most probably 15+ if we can come up with such
12 matches
Mail list logo
