Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

2019-05-20 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 5/20/19 5:28 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/19 5:26 PM, James Cameron wrote: That's not what I've read.  Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older

Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

2019-05-20 Thread Thomas Gilliard
On 5/20/19 5:26 PM, James Cameron wrote: That's not what I've read. Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older Raspberry Pi are unsupported, that's a good reason

Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

2019-05-20 Thread James Cameron
That's not what I've read. Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older Raspberry Pi are unsupported, that's a good reason to use Raspbian, which continues to be

Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

2019-05-19 Thread James Cameron
That's unfortunate. Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release? Are the Fedora 31 ARM builds being tested? On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 09:01:25AM -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > Current f30 soas release for a Rpi3B+ (arm) do not boot [1] > > There is a solution: > >  "if you

[Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

2019-05-19 Thread Thomas Gilliard
Current f30 soas release for a Rpi3B+ (arm) do not boot [1] There is a solution:  "if you replace the initramfs with this one - https://fedorapeople.org/~pwhalen/soas/initramfs-5.0.9-301.fc30.armv7hl.img ...it will boot." on #fedora-arm Hopefully this can be fixed in a rebuild for f30 arm