Thanks, merged
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Aneesh Dogra lionane...@gmail.com wrote:
Added: https://github.com/godiard/sugarlabs-calculate/pull/29
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
Anesh, James,
As the sugarlabs-caalculate project was inactive
Anesh, James,
As the sugarlabs-caalculate project was inactive from 2013,
and we had GCI students sending patches, I forked the repository
and the latest version is here:
https://github.com/godiard/sugarlabs-calculate
I already added a patch similar to Aneesh patch, but made the same mistake,
That's almost correct. The license should be after the copyright. So
move line 17 to line 2. ;-}
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:47:00AM +0530, Aneesh Dogra wrote:
Here you go:
[1]https://github.com/lionaneesh/sugarlabs-calculate/commit/
8df47288de11b9fdc61e4811515110f7b44ee925
On Thu, Jul
G'day Aneesh,
Thanks for coming back to us on this.
Yes, you can do something, and you are the only person who can do it,
because you are the copyright owner.
You just have to edit a file.
As an example of a good file, look at plotlib.py, see how it has both
a copyright (line 2) and a license
I already added license to layout.py
https://github.com/godiard/sugarlabs-calculate/commit/95302e66919ac89338a7a91575f9002dadb9218c
Aneesh is not the copyright holder, he only contributed and added his name:
Quoting Gonzalo Odiard (2015-07-27 15:02:05)
I already added license to layout.py
https://github.com/godiard/sugarlabs-calculate/commit/
95302e66919ac89338a7a91575f9002dadb9218c
Aneesh is not the copyright holder, he only contributed and added his name:
I din't _changed_ the license, just made explicit in the file the license
used in the activity.
Didn't asked to anybody. Feel free to start a research and ask to everybody
of who contributed,
if you don't trust in my judgment.
If anybody of them do not agree (and I am _pretty_sure_ that will not
Hi Aneesh,
I maintain Sugar packaging of Sugar for Debian, and noticed that in the
Calculate activity you've declared copyright for layout.py but not
included a license.
Please always include an explicit license statement where a copyright is
stated, because a lack of license statement does
Hello Jonas,
Thanks for taking the time to let us know. The new maintainer of Calculate
is Gonzalo (cc'ed).
For future reference, you can check this [1] list to see who is currently
maintaining an activity (we certainly need to improve our communication
channels).
Regards,
Martin.
[1]
Hi Martin (and cc others - also alternate address for Aneesh),
Quoting Martin Abente (2015-06-18 12:58:48)
Thanks for taking the time to let us know. The new maintainer of
Calculate is Gonzalo (cc'ed).
For future reference, you can check this [1] list to see who is
currently maintaining an
In our project, is a common practice include a COPYING file in the activity
directory.
Include the text on every file does not have sense for us,
more thinking we still support old devices with few storage space, as the
XO-1.
Could you clarify what are you asking for, specifically, please?
In the
Hi Gonzalo,
Quoting Gonzalo Odiard (2015-06-18 13:33:57)
In our project, is a common practice include a COPYING file in the
activity directory.
Include the text on every file does not have sense for us, more
thinking we still support old devices with few storage space, as the
XO-1.
I am afraid you will find many other activities where the license notation
is
in the same state.
If the current maintainer can't solve the problem, I have nothing to do,
but then don't complain :)
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:39 PM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
I'm with Jonas on
I'm with Jonas on this.
The fault is a copyright statement in a work without a license, and
yes, only the original copyright owner can correct it.
In my opinion, that correction can be a mail reply from the original
copyright owner saying Gonzalo, please add this license short text,
or Gonzalo,
14 matches
Mail list logo
