Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-19 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 17.12.2011, at 11:39, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote: >> I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would >> be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and >> review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sug

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-17 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 00:11 -0500, Samuel Klein wrote: > I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would > be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and > review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming > activity, after all...

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-16 Thread Samuel Klein
I understand why Scratch isn't hosted on aslo at present, but it would be nice if it were hosted in a fashion that supported discovery of and review/discussion of it. Scratch is Sugar's most popular programming activity, after all... On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Thomas C Gilliard < satel...@

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Sebastian Silva
El 15/12/11 18:24, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn escribió: >I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that allowed people to find >* unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities >* activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] under a fre

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Thomas C Gilliard
I tried to do this in : http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table#Activity_Test_Results The criteria are listed at the top of the page. This is a table matrix on the wiki in a sortable and editable form. It is also unmaintained since Nov 2010...: ( Thus newer act

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gary Martin
On 15 Dec 2011, at 21:55, Samuel Klein wrote: > * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities This one is quite a tough one, activities are distributed across a seemingly grey continuum, from non-responding authors, to authors who release in time with the Sugar release schedule

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
>I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that allowed >people to find >* unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities >* activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] >under a free-software license >* links to activities that are fr

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Samuel Klein
I would find ASLO more useful if it had a "Search all" feature that allowed people to find * unmaintained or dormantly-maintained but working activities * activities that can be freely distributed but are not [confirmed to be] under a free-software license * links to activities that are freely avai

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gary Martin
On 15 Dec 2011, at 17:44, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer. +1 Activities without maintainers seem like a spiral to the bottom of the quality bucket - I'd personally not want to recommend the ASLO site to a teacher if we were knowing

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer. Gonzalo On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva wrote: > Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await > confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO > > El 14/12/11 1

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-15 Thread Sebastian Silva
Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn mailto:alan...@hotmail.com>> wrote: It's o

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, > pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. > More info here: > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity Ok. The "importants" are in ASLO.. mayb

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Gonzalo Odiard
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Scratch there are in: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249 > > But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/ > > Was removed for a discussion about his License..

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar experience. More info here: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

2011-12-14 Thread Rafael Ortiz
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Scratch there are in: > http://activities.sugarlabs.org/es-ES/sugar/addon/4249 > > But was removed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/activities/4249/ > > Was removed for a discussion about his License..