Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

On 5/20/19 5:28 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: On 5/20/19 5:26 PM, James Cameron wrote: That's not what I've read.  Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older

Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

On 5/20/19 5:26 PM, James Cameron wrote: That's not what I've read. Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older Raspberry Pi are unsupported, that's a good reason

Re: [Sugar-devel] f30 arm soas now not working and a fix exists..

That's not what I've read. Raspberry Pi 2 and 3 are supported on all stable Fedora releases, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Raspberry_Pi However, if it is true that older Raspberry Pi are unsupported, that's a good reason to use Raspbian, which continues to be

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

In Nicaragua, around 18K XO laptops are using Sugar 0.112, they collect and update every laptop by the end of the school year. In Dominican Republic 750 XO are using Sugar 0.112. I don't know the numbers from Honduras, Costa Rica and Panama, but they also collect and update all the laptops.

Re: [Sugar-devel] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 01:16:03PM -0700, Alex Perez wrote: > James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM: > > That's unfortunate. > > Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing. Root cause was changes made without adequate testing before commit; a degree of confidence and audacity that is somewhat

Re: [Sugar-devel] F30 ARM (Raspberry Pi) SoaS not working, but a fix exists..

James Cameron wrote on 5/19/19 3:50 PM: That's unfortunate. Agreed, but it was due to a lack of testing. Were the Fedora 30 ARM builds being tested before release? They were, but only in QEMU, it would seem. The temporary workaround is to fetch the initramfs referenced below, and then, after

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

Naturally I can only speak of the locations where I am supporting laptop deploymens: Rwanda and Pakistan. In Rwanda there are nearly 400,000 laptops deployed at approcimately 1600 primary schools. These are a mix of XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Most of the XO-1.5s unfortunately have only 2GB

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tony Anderson wrote: > Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 > 0.98. The > primary requirement is that it works on all models of the XO (still by far > the dominant platform for Sugar). It should be documented by an update to >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

I'm curious how often those XO machines are updated to the latest release of Sugar. Does anyone have any estimates for how many machines are in active use and how many are really upgraded? On Mon, May 20, 2019, 3:18 AM Tony Anderson wrote: > Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who

Re: [Sugar-devel] development environment native sugar python 3 dependencies not documented

Yes, developers of Sugar can use a python3 port of Telepathy Python during development, but the developers of Fedora, Debian and Ubuntu prefer that we use a package they already have, rather than make a new package that only Sugar needs. I think it would be better to port to TelepathyGLib first,

Re: [Sugar-devel] development environment native sugar python 3 dependencies not documented

* "python3 version of *telepathy"*. Sorry for the discrepancy. On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:08 PM ANIKET MATHUR wrote: > Thanks. Used Rahul's port of telepathy for python3. Though have to make > some fixes, which I requested here > . These changes

Re: [Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 > 0.98. The primary requirement is that it works on all models of the XO (still by far the dominant platform for Sugar). It should be documented by an update to Documentation 0.106. Tony On 5/20/19 6:36 AM, Alex Perez wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] development environment native sugar python 3 dependencies not documented

Thanks. Used Rahul's port of telepathy for python3. Though have to make some fixes, which I requested here . These changes finally resulted in a successful python3 toolkit installed on my system so far( it might be possible that I face problems as we