Dag Wieers wrote:
I don't think it is a good idea to set AutoReq: no and set the
requirements manually. Because any new updates would have to be verified
manually again, possibly diffing the source.
In this particular case, I doubt there will be updates to
Data::ObjectDriver that will be add
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, David Steinbrunner wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, David Steinbrunner wrote:
Got another that needs an update:
perl-Moose
Updated to 0.87-1.
Looking here it does not show but the _buildlogs shows it had issues:
error: Failed build dependencies:
per
Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, David Steinbrunner wrote:
>>
>> Got another that needs an update:
>>
>> perl-Moose
>
> Updated to 0.87-1.
Looking here it does not show but the _buildlogs shows it had issues:
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Class::MOP) >= 0.89 is needed by p
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Dave Cross wrote:
>
>> On 19/07/09 17:40, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
>>>
>>> > Bugzilla 3.4 will be coming out soon, and it uses the following Perl
>>> > packages as requireme
Am Dienstag, den 21.07.2009, 00:54 +0200 schrieb Dag Wieers:
> The auto requirements are not that bad
Sory but i really think they are totally broken in any non-trivial case.
financial.com AG
Munich head office/Hauptsitz München: Maria-Probst-Str. 19 | 80939 München |
Germany
Frankfurt branc
