Re: [suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 56, Issue 4

2010-02-05 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 13:13 +0100 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: Chris, that can get *really* nasty. The problem is partly that for registered RHEL clients, they use what is basically up2date in grandma's clothing as part of the yum-rhn-plugin utility that downloads RPM's from RedHat

RE: [suggest] meep-mpi, h5utils

2010-02-05 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
Hi! On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:56 -0500, Kristian Medri wrote: http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/harminv.spec.Fedora http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/libctl.spec.Fedora http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/h5utils.spec.SuSE These look good to me. Using:

[suggest] New version of Spamassassin

2010-02-05 Thread Stylianos Stylianou
Hi, Would you please freshen spamassassin to new version 3.3.0 please? Thanks, Stylianos ___ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

RE: [suggest] meep-mpi, h5utils

2010-02-05 Thread Kristian Medri
How about: http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/meep.spec.SuSE the reason I was making my own meep.spec was I didn't have the above yet and wanted to get testing. I noticed my build machine is a bit broken so I will possibly have to reinstall it next week since I was having trouble

RE: [suggest] meep-mpi, h5utils

2010-02-05 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:43 -0500, Kristian Medri wrote: How about: http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/meep.spec.SuSE Hmmm... this SPEC looks more or less good to me, can be adopted with minor changes if no dependency issues arise. If I am to continue making my own specific

[suggest] A few perl module updates

2010-02-05 Thread David Steinbrunner
Hello, Looking for the latest for the following: SQL::Abstract Moose MooseX::Types Thanks, -- David Steinbrunner ___ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest