How about: http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/meep.spec.SuSE
the reason I was making my own meep.spec was I didn't have the above yet and wanted to get testing. I noticed my build machine is a bit broken so I will possibly have to reinstall it next week since I was having trouble configuring --with-mpi (very important for me, and realistically the only way to create a useable simulation environment) while someone else tried it for me and did not have trouble. They are looking into why my yum -y reinstall mpich2.x86_64 mpich2-devel.x86_64 does not function correctly. If I am to continue making my own specific meep.spec in order to configure --with-mpi, is it okay to set Authority: dag on mine as well? Or is there some way of using the above and setting it to configure --with-mpi? -----Original Message----- From: Yury V. Zaytsev [mailto:y...@shurup.com] Sent: February 5, 2010 4:57 AM To: Kristian Medri Cc: suggest@lists.rpmforge.net Subject: RE: [suggest] meep-mpi, h5utils Hi! On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:56 -0500, Kristian Medri wrote: > http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/harminv.spec.Fedora > http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/libctl.spec.Fedora > http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/h5utils.spec.SuSE These look good to me. > Using: > http://www.doe.carleton.ca/~kmedri/research/meep.spec This one is a little bit sloppy. See template we use for pointers: http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/_template.spec > I will continue working on this and appreciate input from anyone who can > help. Well, I'll try to find some time during the coming week to review and commit the prerequisites, so that we can see if Dag is able to build this with our build system. When that's done just let me know when meep will be ready for review. -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev _______________________________________________ suggest mailing list suggest@lists.rpmforge.net http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest
