[Resent because it was rejected because I used a wrong sender address -
apologies if this turns up twice]
Several perl modules have broken dependencies on rhel4.
For example:
perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001
perl-Module-Build-0.3603-1.el4.rfrequires per
Ok no we get some fun:
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 19:48 -0400 schrieb David Steinbrunner:
> H
Thanks for reporting Peter. This happens as I replace autogernerated
dependecies by rpmbuild through autogenerated dependencies from CPAN
metadata. I will have a look at it.
Chris
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Peter J. Holzer:
> [Resent because it was rejected because I used a wr
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Peter J. Holzer:
> [Resent because it was rejected because I used a wrong sender address -
> apologies if this turns up twice]
>
> Several perl modules have broken dependencies on rhel4.
>
> For example:
>
> perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Christoph Maser wrote:
> yum provides "perl >= 5.006001" gives me this:
> perl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-49.el4
3:5.8.5-49.el4 is greater than 5.006001 according to rpm, isn't it?
The dependencies are broken because they do not really check Perl version:
th
Am Donnerstag, den 03.06.2010, 16:59 -0400 schrieb David Steinbrunner:
> David Steinbrunner wrote:
>
> > The XML::LibXSLT and XML::LibXML packages in rpmforge are currently
> > incompatible. See the following as evidence:
> >
> > [Mon May 03 19:19:18 2010] [error] This version of XML::LibXSLT re
On 2010-06-07 11:51:16 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Peter J. Holzer:
> > Several perl modules have broken dependencies on rhel4.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001
> > perl-Module-Build
On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete
> removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide an
> old version for perl-XML-LibXSLT wich works with the perl-XML-LibXML
> version from base. It is m
Am Montag, den 07.06.2010, 15:20 -0400 schrieb Steve Huff:
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
>
> > As I am for a much more strict policy at rpmforge I vote for a complete
> > removal of perl-XML-LibXMl and perl-XML-LibXSLT or at most provide an
> > old version for perl-XML-LibX
