I certainly am a potential subscriber. I have always admired it,
unfortunately only from pictures.
Ron Sterne
Vancouver, B.C.
From: Peter Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sundial Mail List"
Subject: Re: Olquest or Suniver? - Sunquest or Oliver
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 11:26:05 +0930
On May 12t
Fellow dialists,
A few weeks ago there was a thread discussing 'shadow sharpeners' and
the question of the accuracy of the great sundial in Jaipur came up. I was
a bit swamped in marking essays at that point and didn't have time to dig
through some photographs, hunt up references, etc.
-Message d'origine-
De : Gilbert FOUSSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : Liste Solar Eclips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date : mercredi 19 mai 1999 00:08
Objet : A Great New for the Philatelic's amateur...
>Hello Eclips' Chasers, and Dialist,
>
>The Société Astronomique de France and La Poste announce th
Hello,
A few weeks ago, I search
informations about SUN COMPASS on this list.
Thanks to those answered
me.
You can see all informations I have
collected on this webpage:
http://assoc.wanadoo.fr/.atco/compas/compasuk.htm
or
http://wkweb5.cableinet.co.uk/phil.walker/scompass_fr.htm
both in eng
John Carmichael wrote:
> Instead of seeing several sunsets in a row, wouldn't the pilot see just one
> long slow continuous sunset instead?
>
> John Carmichael
>
What my intuition tells me is that this depends on two factors:
a) how fast (and continuously) you move forward; how much
you move up
Peter Mayer contributed:
> Could the financial problem of
>putting them back into production be eased, if not solved, if those who
>want one -- assuming the price was 'within reason' -- 'subscribed' in
>advance?
>
Great idea Peter! Count me in.
Tony Moss
