Hello List Members,
Concerning attachments sent to this mailing list--didn't we endure a
lengthy discussion some time back about whether or not attachments
should be allowed, and, if so, what should be the maximum size
permitted?
Forgive me if I misremember, but wasn't it decided that attac
Dear Fritz,
Using Find Annual Feature function (sdxFindAnnFeatx)of the The SUN API
www.sunlitdesign.com/products/thesunapi I get the follwing value for the
solstice this December:
December 21 19:21:30.7143 [UT] (which is +/- 10 seconds of the true
value)
Compare with http://aa.usno.navy.mil/d
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, R.H. van Gent wrote:
> This depends on the e-mail program that one uses. Netscape (which I use)
> does not allow me to preview the messages at the e-mail server so that I
> can make a choice which ones to download or not.
I agree with Robert, and have a great deal of sympath
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think attachments (less than 200K) are fine. The recipient can make the
> choice whether to download them or not. This is a useful way to share ideas.
This depends on the e-mail program that one uses. Netscape (which I use)
does not allow me to preview the message
"fer j. de vries" wrote:
> I don't agree with the statement of Robert.
> The attachements by Edley are rather small and to me no problem.
All together I have now received up to 50 kb of files from mr. Edley
that nobody asked for showing three badly illuminated detail views of a
sundial. Is this
This topic got me wanting to get a piece of pipe and try it!
>From my new Sky software, which I'm just getting to know,
I found that solstice is at about 11:22 on the 21st. I
then got the declinations on the day before and after at this
time. But the sun changes only 14 seconds(arc)/day. This m
I think attachments (less than 200K) are fine. The recipient can make the
choice whether to download them or not. This is a useful way to share ideas.
When Tony Moss sends large files, he first invites (via this list) people who
want them to reply personally, and then he sends them the files
Hi All,
I don't agree with the statement of Robert.
The attachements by Edley are rather small and to me no problem.
Best wishes, Fer.
Fer J. de Vries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iae.nl/users/ferdv/
Eindhoven, Netherlands
lat. 51:30 N long. 5:30 E
- Original Message -
From: "R
Edley wrote:
> I see now that Peter had sent a copy to owner-sundial... instead of
> to just sundial Since it had attachments with pictures of the
> dial, perhaps this is how it should be done?? I'm somewhat new to
> the list and I don't know. Anyhow, I'm taking a great chance and
> forwar
Dear Membership,
Here is another email that appears to have not been copied to the
list either.
Dear Luke,
Thanks for your Info! I appreciate it! I was saying a more general
statement, but your info reminded me of the article which I recall
reading and which was a part of my thinking.
What
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Dodwell_Front.jpg (JPEG/JVWR) (00038015)
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Dodwell_Detail.jpg (JPEG/JVWR) (00038014)
Sorry Folks!
I see now that Peter had sent a copy to owner-sundial... instead of
to just sundial Since it had attachments with pictures of the
dial, perhaps this is how it should be done?? I'm somewhat new to
the list and I don't know. Anyhow, I'm taking a great chance and
forwarding P
Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Dodwell_Side.jpg (JPEG/JVWR) (0003800E)
Greetings fellow dialists,
You don't have to have a clear sky on the actual day you are wishing to
mark sunrise or sunset. Martin Brennan in his book "The Stones of Time"
showed elegantly how the people at Newgrange in Ireland did it five
thousand years ago with the rising solsticial sun shining
Bill,
I've wondered about the same. Edley seems to be having some wonderful
conversations with himself ;)
Luke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Is there something wrong with the list? It seems that Edley is responding to
> a message about a Dodwell dial, but I never received it.
>
> Bill
Wishing you to have joy, happiness and merriment in the Christmas and New
Year's holidays.
Steve
Yorktown VA USA
Is there something wrong with the list? It seems that Edley is responding to
a message about a Dodwell dial, but I never received it.
Bill Gottesman
Burlington, VT
In a message dated 12/19/2001 4:41:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Date:12/19/2001 4:41:11 AM E
Hi everybody
Thought you might be interested in this quotation...
Something to definitely think about.
To realize the value of ten years:
Ask a newly divorced couple.
To realize the value of four years:
Ask a graduate.
To realize the value of one year:
Ask a student who has failed a final exa
Hello Peter,
Wow, The Dodwell dial is amazing! I wish I had some better pictures
so that I could see it in some more detail. The surfaces appear to
be of the "Astroid/Evolute of an Ellipse" type. I assume the
"unwinding of the analemma" is by multiple gnomons? This has given
me an idea fo
20 matches
Mail list logo
