Daniel Roth wrote:
> Dear Subscribers!
>
> Please note that I changed the default reply-to address to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you press
> reply in your mail software the sundial mailing list will be addressed
> instead of the author of
> the mail to which you reply.
>
> Thank you for your contribu
Title: Message
Dear
All,
I will
take an intuitive punt on any point on the arctic circle as having maximum
ratio of southern exposure to northern exposure. Can't prove
it.
David
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Anselmo Pé
Surely
the answer is the North (South) pole, where all sunlight falls on the South
(North) facing wall, as you cannot build a North (South) facing
one.
Mike Shawhttp://homepage.ntlworld.com/jmikeshaw/N 53º 21'
24"W 03º 01' 47"Wirral, UK.
Anselmo
The sundial on the Place de la Concorde in Paris is
a classical horizontal sundial with the "Obelisque" as a vertical gnomon. Lines
are now more or less erased due a lack of maintenance. There was a scheme with a
short explanation in the june 1999 issue of "L'Astronomie". I can scan
Thinking about this question a little more - during the course of a
complete year, doesn't every point on Earth get 50% light and 50%
dark?
So,
the further North (or South) you go, the more of the 50% shines on the South (or
North) facing wall.
So the
North (or South) pole is the place to g
Hoi Willy,
Graag voor mij ook zo'n plaatje.
PS. Mijn Power Point presentatie begint uit de hand te lopen :-))
Groetjes,
Willy
Willy OryPetrarcastraat 24B-3580 BeringenUMI 51,05°
N 005,2° E[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.zonnewijzerkringvlaanderen.be
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van:
fer
Please send me a copy of the L'Astronomie article on the Place de la Concorde sundial.
Thank you for your offer.
Sincerely,
Harold Brandmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Dear Subscribers!
Please note that I changed the default reply-to address to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you press reply in your mail software the
sundial mailing list will be addressed instead of the author of the mail
to which you reply.
Thank you for your contributions to this list!
Regards
Hi Mike, hi diallists,
When I said a sundial in the North
Pole I meant a sundial, say, at 1 cm from it. There the
concept of North still makes sense and it is
obvious that there there are as many hours of
sunlight in the northern side than in the southern
side in the course of a year. An
Anselmo,
I might have an easy way to solve this in two dimensions. Start by
imagining a three-dimensional ring-shaped object, which represents all
of the points in the celestial sphere where the sun can be. It looks
like part of a truncated globe wherein only the part between the
tropics remain
Message text written by INTERNET:sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
>Now, for a private comment, we have to copy the 'From' address, which is
not so simple.
And I'm afraid that we'll get lots of uninteresting messages like the
'please send me the picture' we see in every language, including the
copy of pos
Reply to : Thierry
>> However, it seems to me that the former configuration was more
flexible: one could indeed easlily either reply to the 'From' address only
(which is justified for example when requesting the direct sending of a
proposed attachment), or 'to all', including the list ('Sender')
Anselmo et All,
I think the answer to your question is latitude 45
degrees.
At any place the sun is half a year above the
horizon.
This also means that the sum of the hours that a
north facing wall and a south facing wall catch the sun also is half a
year.
So we have to look for the la
Anselmo Perez Serrada asked:
> Imagine an oriented wall (gnomonic declination equals to 0 deg in
> one side and 180 deg in the other), all of us know that the southern
> side is exposed more time to sunlight than the northern one, but where
> is this difference bigger? It is clear that in the
Patrick,
When you select 'Reply all', only the adress
appears!
Willy Leenders
50.9 N 5.4 E
Patrick Powers wrote:
> If one needs to reply to the individual privately
> it is easy to remember that there is a need for a small change to the
> address. - after all one only needs to select 'Reply
Don't go Jennie
Its getting really interesting--They are falling out over changes to the
List.
John
53.2N
2.5W
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 March 2002 21:35
To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
Subject: (no subject)
Hmm. Not so, with Pine, at any rate!
I just did a "Reply", rejected "Use Reply-To Address?", and accepted
"Reply to All?"
Dave
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Willy Leenders wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> When you select 'Reply all', only the adress
> appears!
>
> Willy Leenders
> 50.9 N 5.4 E
>
> Patrick Pow
I, too, am not fond of this change. I frequently reply only to the
message originator; this reduces the reflector traffic, which I believe
is a good thing!
I use Netscape Communicator for email and now when clicking the "Reply
All" button, the address list includes only the reflector address.
Cop
18 matches
Mail list logo
