Re: 16th century navigation/surveying

1999-08-04 Thread Fernando Cabral
Arthur Carlson wrote: What I still don't understand is this: Even without an exact measurement of the longitude, how could Cabrillo still think it was only a hop, skip, and a jump from Mexico to Asia 20 years after Magellan had taken 4 months to cross the Pacific? Magellan was sailing for

Re: 16th century navigation/surveying

1999-08-03 Thread Fernando Cabral
Patrick Powers wrote: Use of the moon's motion came later because the moon's motion is so complex - indeed the main competition to Harrison's clocks in the 1700s came from the lunar tables that had by then been calculated. Complementing Patrick Powers' comments: It took Harrison 40

Re: 16th century navigation/surveying

1999-08-02 Thread John Shepherd
A quick answer to Arthur Carlson question, Ranger George seemed to think that the expectations that the Earth was smaller greatly inhibited the discovery of the actual size. The ancient Greeks had believed in a rather small value, and who could question their authority? It was also an important