Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-11 Thread Frank King
Dear All, I have been following this analemmatic thread with particular interest since I have recently been giving advice to a Swedish stone-cutter who wants to set a dial out in her garden. She lives on the cold side of 60 degrees north. I especially noted: I have been talking to people who

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-11 Thread Richard Langley
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, tony moss wrote: Frank King Wrote, Can some U.S. reader who knows all about cold winters kindly let this temperate Brit know what is likely to be found underneath this dial? Is there really 1200mm of hard-core and elaborate drainage? The pedestal of the Longyearbyen dial

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-11 Thread Brian Albinson
I have tried two different mosaic methods (i) the standard amateur direct method given in textbooks of siliconing vitreous glass tiles onto an existing slab and then beating in mortar grout; and (ii) using the reverse method, beating in a thin grout layer and then casting a slab on top.

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-10 Thread tony moss
Anselmo requestd, Now my doubts lie in materials: I have been talking to people hwo knows about road construction and things like these and every one of them tells me a different thing about laying the numbers and the decorations. Any suggestion from you? Ably assisted by Graham Aldred we

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-10 Thread John Carmichael
information on this beautiful dial. - Original Message - From: tony moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Sundial Mail List sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:04 AM Subject: Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more Anselmo requestd, Now my doubts lie in materials

RE: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more modern innovations

2005-04-10 Thread Roger Bailey
PM To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Subject: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more Dear all, Needles to say, this mailing-list is wonderful! Thanks for all your contributions on the greatest feasible size of an analemmatic. I have been making tests with the spreadsheet written by Roger

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-10 Thread Willy Leenders
of the analemmatic sundial in Murcia (Spain) and at http://perso.wanadoo.fr/cadrans-solaires/monde/rasht/images/Abb.2.jpg Willy Leenders Hasselt, Flanders in Belgium anselmo wrote: Dear all, Needles to say, this mailing-list is wonderful! Thanks for all your contributions on the greatest feasible size

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-09 Thread Frans W. Maes
set the date scale on a 30 cm step, you could add 15%, making 8 m (25 ft) the maximum. Best regards, Frans Maes - Original Message - From: anselmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 8:23 AM Subject: On the greatest size of an analemmatic Dear

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-09 Thread BillGottesman
-Bill In a message dated 4/9/2005 11:58:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Anselmo all, In my webpage www.fransmaes.nl/sundials/ - "Analemmatic" - "extra info" - "The human scale", I calculated the shadow paths for a 2 meter gnomon (human with hands above head) in dials

On the greatest size of an analemmatic and more

2005-04-09 Thread anselmo
Dear all, Needles to say, this mailing-list is wonderful! Thanks for all your contributions on the greatest feasible size of an analemmatic. I have been making tests with the spreadsheet written by Roger and Helmut and simulations with POV-RAY, and so far I do believe that 6 meter (18 ft) wide

On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-08 Thread anselmo
Dear all, I need your opinions and advice on which could be the greatest *effective* size of an analemmatic sundial for average latitudes. As you all know, for latitudes about 40 deg, the least longitude of the style equals more or less the major semiaxis of the ellipse so that the shadow can

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-08 Thread Chris Lusby Taylor
good accuracy even if a modest size. Chris Lusby Taylor 51.4N, 1.3W - Original Message - From: anselmo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 7:23 AM Subject: On the greatest size of an analemmatic Dear all, I need your opinions and advice on which

Re: On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-08 Thread BillGottesman
-Bill In a message dated 4/8/2005 2:28:14 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As you all know, for latitudes about 40 deg, the least longitude of the style equals more or less the major semiaxis of the ellipse so that the shadow can reach the ellipse on the worst case, this

RE: On the greatest size of an analemmatic

2005-04-08 Thread Roger Bailey
of an analemmatic Dear all, I need your opinions and advice on which could be the greatest *effective* size of an analemmatic sundial for average latitudes. As you all know, for latitudes about 40 deg, the least longitude of the style equals more or less the major semiaxis of the ellipse so that the shadow