[freenet-support] Bug report

2004-01-15 Thread Victor Hammersley
Hi: Using build 6441, and fred said: Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 15 in queue, 6701 millis since enqueued last item, 291589 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug. Please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] along with JVM and OS/kernel. Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 6 in queu

Re: [freenet-support] Request for including your software in our database

2004-01-15 Thread Troed Sångberg
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:56:22 +, Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You may redistribute, repackage, and modify freenet as much as you like under the terms of the GNU General Public License; I've thought about this since yesterday's mail debate regarding signatures: Freenet will fail its purpose

Re: [freenet-support] Request for including your software in our database

2004-01-15 Thread Toad
Thank you. The actual version of the software was 0.4. We are way behind 1.0, let alone 4.0. The current officially released version is 0.5.2, which you can get from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.tar.gz (for *nix), or http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-0.5.2.1.src.t

[freenet-support] Request for including your software in our database

2004-01-15 Thread Dr G P S Raghava
Dear Sir/Madam We are maintaining a database of free softwares for general purpose (www.imtech.res.in) which are available free of cost for general user and academic community. The aim of this project is to help the scientific community in distributing these software. We are a academic institute a

[freenet-support] Stable build 5061

2004-01-15 Thread Toad
Freenet stable build 5061 is now available. The snapshots have been updated. Get it via the update.sh script on Linux, BSD, or OS/X, or use the freenet-webinstall.exe utility to update on Windows, or get the jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar . All stable branch users s

[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5060 - more routing improvements

2004-01-15 Thread Someone
Hi, I'm still getting many of these: jobPartDone(431) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: CLOSED,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.

RE: [freenet-support] New node not working..."500 server error"from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread Niklas Bergh
> I never changed the browser configuration when I went from dial-up to > cable. Then again, since it is a Microsoft product, maybe it's going > around changing things behind my back and exercising more autonomy > than it should. I'll check... > All there is in LAN settings (which I assume will

Re: [freenet-support] New node not working..."500 server error" from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread Troed Sångberg
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:36:38 -0500, Paul Derbyshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Lastly, is this port being exposed to the Internet going to pose a security risk, or is the fproxy service reasonably robust against the usual things, e.g. buffer overflow exploits. The only thing I can That's so

Re: [freenet-support] New node not working..."500 server error" from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread Paul Derbyshire
On 15 Jan 2004 at 5:54, S wrote: > telnet 127.0.0.1 > > Hit Enter. When the connection opens, type: > > HEAD / HTTP/1.0 Had to blind-type this -- nothing echoed. > HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:43:59 GMT > Pragma: no-cache > Location: /servlet/nodeinfo/ > Expi

Re: [freenet-support] New node not working..."500 server error" from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread S
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:02:22 -0500 "Paul Derbyshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at 127.0.0.1: in ie 6.x. I know my ISP (cable) has some sort of > wonky caching of web pages, as evidenced by intermittent random 500- > series errors I never got on dial-up and the odd out-of-date page > comin

[freenet-support] New node not working..."500 server error" from 127.0.0.1:8888.

2004-01-15 Thread Paul Derbyshire
Got the windows webinstall executable and ran it less than 2 hours ago. Node may or may not be running ok, but fproxy is definitely on the blink. Looked at (without altering) the options, and nothing is obviously bad, such as say fproxy being turned off. Symptom: Server Error The following err

RE: [freenet-support] Helping with website & a little question...

2004-01-15 Thread Herve Lefebvre
> I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon. > :) It seems this email adress is invalid. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane

RE: [freenet-support] Helping with website & a little question...

2004-01-15 Thread Niklas Bergh
> Hello, > > I'd like to help freenet creating a translated into french > website, and also writing so docs or HOWTO etc. Wonderful > BTW, I've already written some articles about freenet such as > http://www.linuxfrench.net/article.php?> id_article=597 but the > comments are "we dont underst

RE: [freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-15 Thread Niklas Bergh
I have checked to code. The file property that is used is 'last modified time'. Can you verify that your touch modified this property on the fields. I have now committed code to unstable which gives a more informative error message. Might be included in the next stable build if Matthew chooses to

[freenet-support] Helping with website & a little question...

2004-01-15 Thread Herve Lefebvre
Hello, I'd like to help freenet creating a translated into french website, and also writing so docs or HOWTO etc. BTW, I've already written some articles about freenet such as http://www.linuxfrench.net/article.php?id_article=597 but the comments are "we dont understand anything on the website" o

Re: [freenet-support] Stable build 5055 crashes under Linux

2004-01-15 Thread Justin The Cynical
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:00:11 +0100 "Niklas Bergh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yup. This means that the newest item in your datastore has a timestamp > that is larger than what your current system clock says the time is. > > Have you modified the clock on the machine or similar recently? > > I r