> [Original Message]
> From: Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 1/19/2004 9:39:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [freenet-support] New with this ... please some help.
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:33:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
Edward J. Huff schrieb:
5061 seems to have a memory leak. I gave it 512M and it still
got up to 450M (I restarted it so it wouldn't run out).
At least I'm not the only one having this problem. I could live with
the node needing 128 MB memory if it will still work without stalling
when reaching
5061 seems to have a memory leak. I gave it 512M and it still
got up to 450M (I restarted it so it wouldn't run out).
Routing remains an unsolved problem... Read freenet-dev
on gmane for more info.
-- Ed Huff
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 20:52, Someone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some switching of dif
Toad schrieb:
Try reducing the maximumThreads.
Maximum threads are already at 200 using Y-threads, it also doesn't look
like a problem with threads, active threads normaly stay somewhere near
30 only for short periods go to ~150. It is also not a explosion of memory
usage, memory usage does consta
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:35:00AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
> > I would suggest the project leader Ian Clarke,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] He will most likely read your mail very soon.
> > :)
>
> It seems this email adress is invalid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the correct address.
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL P
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 03:51:32AM +0100, Someone wrote:
> After more experiments with the node it seems like it needs way
> more memory than I can give it. I stopped all other services running
> on the machine and give fred the whole 192 MB that were not needed
> by windows. With this it managed t
After more experiments with the node it seems like it needs way
more memory than I can give it. I stopped all other services running
on the machine and give fred the whole 192 MB that were not needed
by windows. With this it managed to run 15 hours before running out
of memory. So it seems to me th
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:33:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I found a doc about freenet and have been these last days trying
> to connect. The program installed without any problem. I installed the
> version who comes with Java. After some minute
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:16:33AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Anyone else seeing a decline in the number of contactable nodes in the
> routing table?
>
> My node seems to be dropping the most backed-off entries (CP=0.0), but
> retaining the entries which can't be contacted (CP=1.0).
Wrong way ar
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:41:30AM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying
> > and
> > then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my
> > node
> > updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:31:26PM +, Russell Hedger wrote:
> I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and
> then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node
> updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more ofte
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 10:08:30PM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2004 at 5:24, S wrote:
>
> > Anyone can change the "latest build number" by editing Version.java and
> > compiling the source on their machine. If you were so inclined, you
> > could change your "latest build number" to 9
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:39:55AM +0100, Niklas Bergh wrote:
> Yet a couple...
>
> Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 621 (576/45/956)
> Number of distinct nodes connected 507
Okay, so it's definitely not that the network is that small - either
it's a limited-horizons problem, or more l
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 03:22:53AM -0600, S wrote:
> Has anyone been able to connect to significantly more than 350 distinct
> nodes on Stable?
>
> Ever since muxing and its reduced connection overhead made it into
> Stable, I've noticed a pattern with my node's connections. It'll peak
> somewhere
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:50:55AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
> This puzzles me. The win installer has worked without a hitch (except to
> ask you to shut down freenet) as long as I've used it. The only difference
> I've seen recently is twice (not always) reporting a failure to complete a
> do
Hi, i received this message from Fred 5 build 5061:
Waited more than 200ms to dequeue, 14 in queue, 3108 millis since enqueued last item,
791012 maximum waits so far - could indicate serious JVM bug.
kernel: 2.4.20
jvm: 1.4.2_03
bye
___
Support mailing
Twice now, Freenet has suddenly, as in a matter of
seconds, increased its memory usage by about 500mb, to
a total of 6-700mb. It's extremely obvious because it
flushes all my current memory to disk (512mb physical
ram), killing everything. The memory is not released
again until I restart Freenet.
Getting over 300 messages per hour with build 5061 and logLevel=error:
16.01.2004 04:36:53 (freenet.node.states.request.DataPending,
YThread-496, ERROR): Got a really late DataReply. We really ought to
cache it, on freenet.node.states.request.DataPending:
key=0c53b568d998b7617f6021bdb642bd97ac41f1
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:17:14PM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> I think anyone who regularly browses Freenet is going to destroy their
> node's specialisation. Not really a big problem since it means popular
> content is available from more places in the network. Also, recent
> changes (in 5061) to
Toad schrieb:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote:
What CPU do you have? How much memory? How much memory is the node
apparently using? How much does it say it is using?
Still an K6-2 @300MHz with 256 MB of RAM. It is normally using about
30 to 40 MB more memory than it tells
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 04:22:28PM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Herve Lefebvre schrieb:
>
> >
> >Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows.
>
> Well maybe there will be one in the future.
>
> >But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > Niklas Bergh schrieb:
> >
> >> Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1
> >> one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can
> >> download it.
> >
> > Seems to be only 1.3.1
> > h
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:27:46PM +0100, Herve Lefebvre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
> > it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log,
>
> What kind of errors ?
>
> > high CPU
> > and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 01:18:49PM +0100, Someone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but
> it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU
> and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading
What CPU do you have? How muc
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:59:37AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Does a node send any kind of error when it receives Unrecognized
> trailers? I'm seeing many of these messages (see below), even after the
> node has been running an hour.
This happens on startup mostly, because of trailers that were
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:35:03AM +, Kevin Steen wrote:
> Some observations from my 5061 node, ocmContents page (and the resulting
> questions to enhance my understanding of what's going on.) :
>
> Established node, restarted and run for 2 hrs:
> Total amount of messages transfered
> Type
> S
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 02:30:53AM -0500, Paul Derbyshire wrote:
> You may remember me as the one who had problems with fproxy that
> proved to be brain-dead IE defaults. Turns out fproxy and my node are
> working fine, and the node gets around 1 request a second suggesting
> it's integrating wa
Hello!
I found a doc about freenet and have been these last days trying
to connect. The program installed without any problem. I installed the
version who comes with Java. After some minutes waiting the rabbit changed
to blue and connected well.
The seed no
> Otherwise, I had also to increase the file descriptors allowed for the
> user runninf the node (ulimit).
I haven't had any trouble with this resource limit yet.
In line with your and other people's comments, I have increased my java VM
memory to 200 MB and commented out the 'routingTableImpl'
Niklas Bergh schrieb:
Comment out routingTableImpl (to allow the node to use whatever is
appropriate for the node type you are running).
Otherwise it looks pretty ok.
/N
Current stable won't use ng-routing, what you set in the ini doesn't
matter here.
__
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Russell Hedger
> Sent: den 18 januari 2004 22:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] GNU/Linux freenet.conf settings
>
>
> I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network
> I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying
> and
> then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my
> node
> updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often
> the node sticks at 100 % and dies. Someone suggested IBM'
I used to run a freenet node, gave up when the network seemed to be dying and
then, before Christmas, things appeared to be working again. I keep my node
updated with the latest version and sometimes it seems to work; more often
the node sticks at 100 % and dies. Someone suggested IBM's version
Anyone else seeing a decline in the number of contactable nodes in the
routing table?
My node seems to be dropping the most backed-off entries (CP=0.0), but
retaining the entries which can't be contacted (CP=1.0).
-Kevin
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL
Yet a couple...
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 621 (576/45/956)
Number of distinct nodes connected 507
/N
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [freenet-support] Number of
35 matches
Mail list logo
