14MB...sorry about he typo :)
-Original Message-
From: Toad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:50:08PM +0500, Aman Pervaiz wrote:
> Yup
In the current unstable seednodes there are
313 references, but only 162 unique nodes.
Of the 162, a lot are artifacts leaved by
updating or changing port.
Can this be a problem, considering the
current hight reseeding frequency ?
FWIW. Marco
--
+ il Progetto Freenet - segui il con
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:59:46AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote:
>
> Would you possibly agree with this, "There is no known way to meaningfully
> evaluate the performance of freenet?"
No. There are several ways to evaluate it. My favourite is "push/pull
tests". Insert a file on one node, and fetch
If you run behind a firewall, you are expected to be a power user. If
you run on dialup, you are expected not to get very far. Apart from
that, it ought to work, at least sometimes, even on the default stable
network, according to recent support reports.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:10:24PM -0500, N
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:26:18PM -0500, Keith Botelho wrote:
> you could get the latest build which is 6281.
Uhmm, no, the latest build is 60,003 :)
> - Original Message -
> From: "Martin Stone Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:5
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:03:33PM -0800, Eugene Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope someone can answer these questions for me.
>
> I've got build 6281 installed and running. This link:
Where did you get build 6281 from?
> http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/version_histogram.txt
> says "nodes:
Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of
DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread,
and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd
want a real FCP spider; there must be one out there somewhere.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:18:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
> > criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be
> > enhanced. Topics include installation,
Hello,
As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight
hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the
effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network.
I read on the list that a node needs to be online for a while until it
will have gathered
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight
> hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the
> effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network.
What happen
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:37:33PM -0500, vinyl1 wrote:
> I have a similar machine with Win2K and dialup, and can't get anywhere.
>
> I'm not surprised that I can't retrieve much freesite content, although
> surprisingly I can get a fair number of Frost messages.
>
> What baffled me is that I was
I'd guess it was a problem with the OS, or the JVM. You can however work
around it by setting ipAddress= and ipDetectorInterval=0
in the config file (remove any preceding %'s or #'s first), and of
course restarting the node.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:04:29AM +, Toad wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I
> > had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be
> > delighted and I don't
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:36:09PM +0200, notmyrealemail wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Build 5073 seems to connect very poorly and the log is filled with
> this kind of messages :
>
> 16:25:39 RouteNotFound Fetching (running)
> freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],Zt29QUMcl6ozbq4MqdSOhQ as
> freenet.exe for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Toad wrote:
| Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of
| DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread,
| and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd
| want a real FCP spide
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which
> still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much
> faster).
Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;)
mihi
__
Michael Schierl schrieb:
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which
still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much
faster).
Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;)
I get many of these
Please provide reference to a good glossary.
>
> I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum
> precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an
> untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to work pretty nicely.
Is sandbox just Linux term or does it have br
Nicholas Sturm wrote:
Please provide reference to a good glossary.
I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum
precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an
untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to work pretty nicely.
Is sandbox just Linux term o
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I get many of these (using FIW 0.08):
>
> #11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42]
>
> they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max
> connections number of 100.
Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's
Michael Schierl schrieb:
Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's guide to
the galaxy"?) is just a code for "bad things happend" as any other
combination of at least twice 42.
In that case it means that an insert returned a DNF message which is
invalid according to the spec and
21 matches
Mail list logo