RE: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Aman Pervaiz
14MB...sorry about he typo :) -Original Message- From: Toad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3/10/2004 10:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 09:50:08PM +0500, Aman Pervaiz wrote: > Yup

[freenet-support] Duplicated references

2004-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the current unstable seednodes there are 313 references, but only 162 unique nodes. Of the 162, a lot are artifacts leaved by updating or changing port. Can this be a problem, considering the current hight reseeding frequency ? FWIW. Marco -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il con

Re: [freenet-support] freenet commitment settings

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:59:46AM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: > > Would you possibly agree with this, "There is no known way to meaningfully > evaluate the performance of freenet?" No. There are several ways to evaluate it. My favourite is "push/pull tests". Insert a file on one node, and fetch

Re: [freenet-support] How to (REALLY) get on the NEW unstable branch

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
If you run behind a firewall, you are expected to be a power user. If you run on dialup, you are expected not to get very far. Apart from that, it ought to work, at least sometimes, even on the default stable network, according to recent support reports. On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:10:24PM -0500, N

Re: [freenet-support] Re: How to (REALLY) get on the NEW unstable branch

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:26:18PM -0500, Keith Botelho wrote: > you could get the latest build which is 6281. Uhmm, no, the latest build is 60,003 :) > - Original Message - > From: "Martin Stone Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 10:5

Re: [freenet-support] A few basic questions

2004-03-11 Thread support
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 10:03:33PM -0800, Eugene Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I hope someone can answer these questions for me. > > I've got build 6281 installed and running. This link: Where did you get build 6281 from? > http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/version_histogram.txt > says "nodes:

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread, and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd want a real FCP spider; there must be one out there somewhere. On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at

Re: [freenet-support] Usability improvement ideas

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:18:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive > > criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be > > enhanced. Topics include installation,

[freenet-support] Periodically restarting the node...

2004-03-11 Thread Krist van Besien
Hello, As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network. I read on the list that a node needs to be online for a while until it will have gathered

Re: [freenet-support] Periodically restarting the node...

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:49:46PM +0100, Krist van Besien wrote: > Hello, > > > As on my system my node reliably goes haywire after about 6 to eight > hours I need to restart it periodically. I'm just wondering what the > effect is on how well my node is integrated in the network. What happen

Re: [freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:37:33PM -0500, vinyl1 wrote: > I have a similar machine with Win2K and dialup, and can't get anywhere. > > I'm not surprised that I can't retrieve much freesite content, although > surprisingly I can get a fair number of Frost messages. > > What baffled me is that I was

Re: [freenet-support] This error is showing up in my logs a LOT

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
I'd guess it was a problem with the OS, or the JVM. You can however work around it by setting ipAddress= and ipDetectorInterval=0 in the config file (remove any preceding %'s or #'s first), and of course restarting the node. On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote: >

Re: [freenet-support] Just Getting Started

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:04:29AM +, Toad wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0800, Galen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think I have a relatively decent idea of how freenet works. And if I > > had a nice broadband connection I could dedicate to freenet, I'd be > > delighted and I don't

Re: [freenet-support] Build 5073 : RouteNotFound Fetching (running) freenet.exe ???

2004-03-11 Thread Toad
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 06:36:09PM +0200, notmyrealemail wrote: > > Hello, > > Build 5073 seems to connect very poorly and the log is filled with > this kind of messages : > > 16:25:39 RouteNotFound Fetching (running) > freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED],Zt29QUMcl6ozbq4MqdSOhQ as > freenet.exe for

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Ian Clarke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad wrote: | Unfortunately crawling freenet via HTTP will have the main effect of | DoSing your freenet node, because every web download takes up a thread, | and we therefore limit parallel HTTP downloads to 24-36. Ideally you'd | want a real FCP spide

[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Michael Schierl
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which > still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much > faster). Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;) mihi __

[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Someone
Michael Schierl schrieb: Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much faster). Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;) I get many of these

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Nicholas Sturm
Please provide reference to a good glossary. > > I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum > precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an > untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to work pretty nicely. Is sandbox just Linux term or does it have br

Re: [freenet-support] need a program to crawl links in freenet

2004-03-11 Thread Salah Coronya
Nicholas Sturm wrote: Please provide reference to a good glossary. I tried it (in a sandbox Linux account, which is absoltely the minimum precaution anyone should take if running code downloaded from an untrusted anonymous source) and it seems to work pretty nicely. Is sandbox just Linux term o

[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Michael Schierl
Someone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I get many of these (using FIW 0.08): > > #11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42] > > they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max > connections number of 100. Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's

[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville

2004-03-11 Thread Someone
Michael Schierl schrieb: Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's "Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy"?) is just a code for "bad things happend" as any other combination of at least twice 42. In that case it means that an insert returned a DNF message which is invalid according to the spec and