Windows 98? Try rebooting :) Seriously, the below is an operating system
or JVM problem.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:15:49AM +0200, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> 5091
> reseeded
> worked last night.
>
> start this morning and get
> "connection closed by remote server" error in browser
>
> follows freene
Nothing in the stats or the log is particularly interesting... Can you
show me the top 10-20 lines of the Routing Table page (on Node Status) ?
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 06:53:51PM +, Hans Dampf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running Freenet 5901 on a Linux Gentoo Box, 750 MHz, 256 MB RAM,
> using bla
With 100 connections open, it ought not to RNF _all_ the time... but if
you haven't had the node up for at least 24 hours, it won't perform
well. If you click Advanced mode on the web interface, it will give more
information about errors, and you can access Node Status; then click on
Routing Table,
How long has your node been up?
How many connections does it have?
Can you show me the top ~15 lines of the Routing Table page?
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:22:23PM +0200, murex2001 (gmx) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My node is:
>
> Node Version 0.5
> Protocol Version STABLE-1.50
> Build Number 5091
> CVS R
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 11:20:30PM +0200, murex2001 (gmx) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following system message:
>
> Attempts were made to contact 4 nodes.
> 0 were totally unreachable.
> 0 restarted.
> 4 cleanly rejected.
> 46 backed off.
>
> What means "backed off" ?
Freenet nodes have a limited capaci
Hmm. Did you reseed after updating? Were you running a build before 5089
before you updated? How long has your node been running? It may help to
just leave it running for 24 hours or so; it will find more nodes...
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:52:03PM +0200, Flesch Laurent wrote:
> Have installed the
Why cannot Freenet retain it's previous states better?
And, why, when I update to each newer version, must I lose
connections that I had before(YoYo for example) which have to
rebuild themselves up to their previous state of connectivity?
Looks to me(an un-knowing one) like there should be a wa
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 08:09:06AM -0700, Michael wrote:
> Why cannot Freenet retain it's previous states better?
> And, why, when I update to each newer version, must I lose
> connections that I had before(YoYo for example) which have to
> rebuild themselves up to their previous state of conne
Dear Sirs -- Will gladly contribute $100 if you get me on Freenet.
Please advise
1 Using Mac OS X version 10.3.5
2 Verified by terminal mode that JRE is 1.4.2
3 Downloaded freenet-latest.tar ok and unzipped it ok leading to
envelope named "freenet"
4 Moved envelope named freenet to my Applica
Even the error message tells you what to do:
> $ tar xfz freenet-latest.tgz
> $ cd freenet
> $ sh start-freenet.sh"
in your case, since you 'unzipped' the tar to your Applications/Utilities
folder, you'll need to "cd Applications/Utilities" instead (or whatever
the path to your Applications/Utili
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 10:38:01AM -0700, LXZ wrote:
> Dear Sirs -- Will gladly contribute $100 if you get me on Freenet.
> Please advise
>
> 1 Using Mac OS X version 10.3.5
> 2 Verified by terminal mode that JRE is 1.4.2
> 3 Downloaded freenet-latest.tar ok and unzipped it ok leading to
> en
After reseeding, I have now 390 nodes after 12 hours.
Is it an acceptable number ?
However, I still have no Inbound connection (see below) and opening
freesites give me "clasical" errors.
--
Number of known routing nodes 390
Number of node references 390
Num
12 matches
Mail list logo
