Matthew Toseland wrote:
So what's the benefit to us then?
Umm... wasn't the original problem something like "how to distinguish a
freenet process from other java processes (under Windows) so that the
firewall can handle it differently"?
The reason I replied to the wrong post is that the ori
So what's the benefit to us then?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:41:15PM +0300, Constantine Dokolas wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
> >might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
>
> AFAIK, launch4j (http://sourceforge.net/pro
Matthew Toseland wrote:
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
AFAIK, launch4j (http://sourceforge.net/projects/launch4j) should do the
trick. Most important features for freenet (from their page):
- LGPL
- "process
Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
> might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:56:42PM +0400, Danila Medvedev wrote:
> > Under win2k Freenet (latest version, downloaded webinstall
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 12:36:24PM +0200, Alex R. Mosteo wrote:
> Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
> >might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
>
> This means that compability with gjc is a feature of 0.7?
Hopefully. Can't promise
Matthew Toseland wrote:
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
This means that compability with gjc is a feature of 0.7?
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:56:42PM +0400, Danila Medvedev wrote:
Under win2k Freenet (latest v
How do you suggest we fix the problem? If freenet was compilable that
might help I suppose. Hopefully 0.7 will be.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:56:42PM +0400, Danila Medvedev wrote:
> Under win2k Freenet (latest version, downloaded webinstall without Java -
> Java 1.4.2_06 already installed) conne
Under win2k Freenet (latest version, downloaded webinstall without Java -
Java 1.4.2_06 already installed) connections show up to my firewall
(AtGuard!) as javaw.exe
In process explorer I see javaw.exe as a child process of freenet.exe.
Creating a general firewall rule permitting all outgoi
I am a SBC DSL account. I am not sure if it is Win XP or SBC but it
seems my connection get timed out after about 2 hours. Even with
Freenet running it is still timing me out. Is there an easy remedy to
this?
Thanks to any replies
___
Support mailing
