I'd also ask why it is physically based in the UK which is undoubtedly the
western country most repressive of internet use.
Only yesterday the 'interception modernatization programme' which would
attempt to record all emails was dropped for 'tecnhical' reasons:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/no
On Nov 9, 2009, at 17:16:24 +0100, bimbek wrote:
>
> Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban
> the poor
> guy.
>
> I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
> court
> would say that using freenet is illegal...
Did anyone catch the irony t
First, I appreciate that Matthew had to "ban" Toni. Open discussion
of Freenet documents is just plain stupid, for obvious reasons.
Second, I'm sure that Freenet and this list are already illegal in
many countries. If Freenet ever becomes popular, it will undoubtedly
become illegal everywhere, mo
Meh, it's no different from what television and movie producers do on
a daily basis...
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:27 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist
wrote:
> urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
>> ...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
>> illegal? Just because you can't run the softw
We'll talk in Freetalk/FMS then :)
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:27 PM, VolodyA! V Anarhist <
volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org> wrote:
> urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
> > ...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
> > illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean
fms works very well as soon as you get through the first captchas.
freetalk i guess will become it's successor when they make it stable and
included in freenet distributions.
never tried frost - i'm not french ;)
welcome back :)
2009/11/9 Joel C. Salomon
> I've used Freenet in the past (the earl
I've used Freenet in the past (the early days of 0.7) and I'd like to try again.
Back then, there was Frost, which I used until the DOS/spam made it
unpleasant to do so. Now I read about frost, freemail, freetalk, &c.,
and I wonder: which of these are working? Which have active
discussions? Poi
urza9...@gmail.com пишет:
> ...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
> illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you
> can't talk about it. We (supposedly) have freedom of speech here in
> the US - I mean, murder is illegal, but you can still _talk_
VolodyA! V Anarhist a écrit :
bimbek пишет:
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the
poor guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
court would say that using freenet is illegal...
Actually somebody will (whether or not it
...why would this mailing list have to shut down if Freenet was deemed
illegal? Just because you can't run the software doesn't mean you
can't talk about it. We (supposedly) have freedom of speech here in
the US - I mean, murder is illegal, but you can still _talk_ about
murder. Hell you can even r
bimbek пишет:
> Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the
> poor guy.
>
> I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US
> court would say that using freenet is illegal...
Actually somebody will (whether or not it will be Matthew Toseland or not
Oh, with all the respect Matthew Toseland, you did not need to ban the poor
guy.
I hope that one day you will not ban all of us just because some US court
would say that using freenet is illegal...
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http
12 matches
Mail list logo
