Re: [freenet-support] How can a system administrator detect active freenodes?

2009-08-21 Thread Jim Cook
. Although you'd still know that they were hogging bandwidth, you wouldn't have a clue what they were doing with it. = Jim Cook jimc...@panix.com ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support

[freenet-support] Firefox (Ubuntu) - Freenet is now default profile

2008-08-19 Thread Jim Cook
_ >Support mailing list >Support at freenetproject.org >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook

Re: [freenet-support] Firefox (Ubuntu) - Freenet is now default profile

2008-08-19 Thread Jim Cook
/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org

[freenet-support] how to uninstall freenet?

2008-05-23 Thread Jim Cook
cribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook

Re: [freenet-support] how to uninstall freenet?

2008-05-22 Thread Jim Cook
] = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[freenet-support] freenet wont connect to any other nodes

2008-05-14 Thread Jim Cook
twork.freenet.support >Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe = Jim Cook

Re: [freenet-support] freenet wont connect to any other nodes

2008-05-14 Thread Jim Cook
at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-07 Thread Jim Cook
to > reseed? Does >it > > >show the announcing alert on the homepage? What does it say in the > > >wrapper.log? > > > > On the homepage, it said that it was trying to connect, and that it > > would be slow for a while. I've e-mailed you the relevant part of > > the wrapper.log. > >What if you click on the alert? Show me the details. OK, the next time it happens, I'll reply again with the details. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Cook
At 09:17 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 01:41, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 01:50 PM 5/5/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > > > > > > After checking the logs, it's clear what's going on

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Cook
At 09:18 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:49, Jim Cook wrote: > > Tor's FAQ notes ... > > > > "Tor and Freenet work on different levels: Tor is about transport, > > and Freenet is about stora

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Cook
At 09:18 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: * PGP Signed by an unknown key On Tuesday 06 May 2008 02:49, Jim Cook wrote: Tor's FAQ notes ... Tor and Freenet work on different levels: Tor is about transport, and Freenet is about storage/retrieval. So it would make perfect sense

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-06 Thread Jim Cook
At 09:17 AM 5/6/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: * PGP Signed by an unknown key On Tuesday 06 May 2008 01:41, Jim Cook wrote: At 01:50 PM 5/5/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: snip After checking the logs, it's clear what's going on. Freenet runs just fine after I log off; indeed

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Cook
eenet nodes." That sounds cool. But is it feasible, given that Freenet uses UDP and Tor uses TCP? I've read on Freenet's website the possible ways to anonymize internode connections, and saw no mention of Tor. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Cook
dropped all connections, and wouldn't reconnect until I stopped and restarted. I'll e-mail log excerpts off list. = Jim Cook

Re: [freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Cook
enough logs to span the last logoff/logon, but I saw the same behavior after the update to Build #1145. Within a few hours after the update, the node dropped all connections, and wouldn't reconnect until I stopped and restarted. I'll e-mail log excerpts off list. snip = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED

[freenet-support] Freenet and Tor

2008-05-05 Thread Jim Cook
nodes. That sounds cool. But is it feasible, given that Freenet uses UDP and Tor uses TCP? I've read on Freenet's website the possible ways to anonymize internode connections, and saw no mention of Tor. = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-04 Thread Jim Cook
net's data routing and retention logic. Anyway, > > I'm now thinking that running an encrypted virtual machine may be an > > acceptable alternative. > >Possibly. If it's transient it would be recreated on startup; if it isn't, it >would obviously be possible to investigate it if the computer was taken away. For now, I've just created an AES-encrypted virtual disk to store downloads. >* PGP Signed by an unknown key >* text/plain body >* Unknown Key >* 0xE43DA450 = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-05-02 Thread Jim Cook
At 01:11 PM 4/30/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Wednesday 30 April 2008 00:27, Jim Cook wrote: > > At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > >> Old Signed by an unknown key > > > > > >On Tuesday

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-04-29 Thread Jim Cook
At 06:18 AM 4/29/2008, Matthew Toseland wrote: >* PGP Signed by an unknown key > >On Tuesday 29 April 2008 03:44, Jim Cook wrote: > > Thank you again, Matthew (and Volodya) for your patience with my > > naive questions. Regarding the Firefox issue, I've found a W

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-04-28 Thread Jim Cook
idance re optimal CPU, memory, storage and bandwidth settings. The server has two 3.6 GHz Xeons and 4 Gb RAM, and I could spare 100 Gb RAID 10 storage and maybe 50 KiB/sec output bandwidth. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] update and more questions

2008-04-28 Thread Jim Cook
optimal CPU, memory, storage and bandwidth settings. The server has two 3.6 GHz Xeons and 4 Gb RAM, and I could spare 100 Gb RAID 10 storage and maybe 50 KiB/sec output bandwidth. = Jim Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list Support

[freenet-support] insecure mode and port forwarding

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
forward any ports through my hardware firewall, and I hesitate to do so without understanding the security implications. I'd appreciate suggestions for further reading re both issues. Thanks again. = Jim Cook

[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

[freenet-support] Firefox 2 gone after installing Freenet 0.7

2008-04-25 Thread Jim Cook
? Is that a requirement for running Freenet-tweaked Firefox? Thanks = Jim Cook