Shane Hare wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> After starting freenet, I find that within a short space of time, my
> internet connection no longer works. It appears that the modem is still
> connected and able to send information, but does not appear to receive
> any information. This results in my
Shane Hare wrote:
Hi,
After starting freenet, I find that within a short space of time, my
internet connection no longer works. It appears that the modem is still
connected and able to send information, but does not appear to receive
any information. This results in my internet connection
Level 13 wrote:
> I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm
> somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad
> things about this version.
I'm not terribly complaining... but i'm looking for a good free alternative,
though.
--
===
Contact details:
Level 13 wrote:
> I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the
> Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up
> to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to
> vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I
Level 13 wrote:
I've noticed that ever since I started running my Freenet node, the
Zone Alarm's vsmon.exe process is literally eating memory. It goes up
to 700 MB. Whenever the system decides to allocate more memory to
vsmon.exe, the whole system is stuck until the process is finished (I
Level 13 wrote:
I'm using the last version of 5.5 series (freeware version). I'm
somehow reluctant about installing 6 since I've heard so much bad
things about this version.
I'm not terribly complaining... but i'm looking for a good free alternative,
though.
--
===
Contact details:
Alt
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> That's not the point. We already intend to make HTL=0 attacks
> infeasible, and they go well beyond datastore probing (think social
> engineering with NIM forms, Frost posts; put a different KSK/SSK on each
> node).
>
> The point is, you can still time it, and there's no
ded to break your anonymity somewhat
> at the cost of performance.
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:16:02AM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote:
>
>>I have heard somewhere that in the 0.7 your node might chose not to give a
>>block that it has, in order to protect the anonymity. I
I have heard somewhere that in the 0.7 your node might chose not to give a
block that it
has, in order to protect the anonymity. Is that true? If so will that also
apply at HTL=0?
--
===
Contact details:
Alt e-mail: k0324474 at kingston.ac.uk
ICQ: 253627744
Frost: VolodyA! V A at
anonymity somewhat
at the cost of performance.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:16:02AM +0100, Volodya Mozhenkov wrote:
I have heard somewhere that in the 0.7 your node might chose not to give a
block that it has, in order to protect the anonymity. Is that true? If so
will that also apply at HTL=0?
Well
I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and over
again, i have
been reading these discussions and explanations for quite some time, but can't
find an
answers to the questions that interests me.
Let's say I trust John and Jill. I create my own litte darknet to
I know that you probably hate people asking the same questions over and over again, i have
been reading these discussions and explanations for quite some time, but can't find an
answers to the questions that interests me.
Let's say I trust John and Jill. I create my own litte darknet to
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Why would doAnnounce be set to no?
I don't know. (honestly i have thought for about 5 minutes how to answer
this question, this is the truest answer).
For example i set it to no, after seeing that my node is integrated well
enough.
--
===
Contact details:
Alt
maxi gas wrote:
> hi!
>
> i am about to give a presentation of freenet at a conference in
> Budapest from an academic anarchist point of view, also concentrating
> on "legislative and control" aspects. can anyone recommend me any
> papers on the subject beyond what is linked under Papers at
maxigas wrote:
> hi!
>
> i haven't used freenet for a week, and then not even the "Web Interface"
> loaded. i restarted freenet, tryed again, nothing again. i stopped
> reseeded started. Now the Web Interface is working but not the other
> nodes. i get icon for the Freedom Engine and Content of
maxigas wrote:
hi!
i haven't used freenet for a week, and then not even the Web Interface
loaded. i restarted freenet, tryed again, nothing again. i stopped
reseeded started. Now the Web Interface is working but not the other
nodes. i get icon for the Freedom Engine and Content of Evil. does
maxi gas wrote:
hi!
i am about to give a presentation of freenet at a conference in
Budapest from an academic anarchist point of view, also concentrating
on legislative and control aspects. can anyone recommend me any
papers on the subject beyond what is linked under Papers at
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Why would doAnnounce be set to no?
I don't know. (honestly i have thought for about 5 minutes how to answer
this question, this is the truest answer).
For example i set it to no, after seeing that my node is integrated well
enough.
--
===
Contact details:
Alt
temp dormail wrote:
I have installed Freenet on a Windows XP computer and used the ref file that comes with
it. And even thoug I have DMZ turned on, letting all communications thrugh my router,
that route not found error is still there far too much! Some sites are
browseable, at least, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
