After running Freenet for a while (Actually only 2 weeks this time), I
sometimes get the exclamation icon in the tray. The last thing in
freenet.log is:
Exception in thread "YThread-2184" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
space
Aug 29, 2005 9:42:23 AM (freenet.node.Node, YThread-1994):
After running Freenet for a while (Actually only 2 weeks this time), I
sometimes get the exclamation icon in the tray. The last thing in
freenet.log is:
Exception in thread YThread-2184 java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
space
Aug 29, 2005 9:42:23 AM (freenet.node.Node, YThread-1994): Error
My node often overloads with too many transfers. You will see that I
have 467 active transfers transmitting.
**Connections [Switch to peers mode]**
Wed Dec 29 10:03:30 PST 2004
[More details]
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 70 (12/58/100)
Transfers active
My Java version
java -version
java version 1.4.1
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01, mixed mode)
I'm running SuSE 8.2 and I have 1.3GB of memory and I'm not running out
of memory.
uname -a
Linux X
Since the 5089 announcement, I've been checking the FProxy main page for
an indication that 5089 is available, but it doesn't show that it is
available. I have been able to upgrade to 5089, but I'm concerned that
there are nodes out there that won't know that it's time to upgrade.
How is the
I've found that Freenet is a great tool for stress testing my system.
You might want to run memtest on your box to see if you have a bad stick
of memory.
http://www.memtest.org/
http://www.memtest86.com/
Shoey Fighter wrote:
Hello. I have recently installed Slackware 10.0 (java 1.4.2) and the
Thanks, that worked. Would you happen to know the min/max for the
entries that have a numeric value?
Salah Coronya wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults?
Apparently the .conf file is
Thanks for the timely example.
Not to be too argumentative, but shouldn't 100 connections be the
default for most users, and if your system can handle more, then you can
increase it?
Kevin Steen wrote:
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 14:34, Manfred Huber wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing the following
Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults?
Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated.
Toad wrote:
No, it's 200. It used to be 512.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not a Linux nut, but I agree with this in principal. Just using a
software firewall is totally insecure. Your best bet, if you don't want
to bother setting up a Linux box to act as your go between, [...]
What, a linux/unix box is *not* a software firewall? :)
--
5:45PM up 132 days, 3
First they came for the child porn sites ...
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html
Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml
Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time,
so what should we do to prevent them from
Thanks. I have a SMC router that does have a tough time keeping up with
Freenet.
On a side note, I've found another use for Freenet as a system stress
test. Unlike most applications, with Freenet you can really see a
differences when you change your system configuration. If you have bad
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the
offending IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses
was fixed being that
For a long time I've received what looks like SYN floods and SMURF
attacks to my port associated with Freenet. I've assumed that it's a
fault of my firewall or PC, but what's weird is that the port of the
offending IP increments. I thought that the port that Freenet uses
was static being
Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node
has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3
connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more
connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not
the same .conf
I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does
this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on
the unstable node?
Someone wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node
has many? When I
Thanks for the response. I had closed the port on my firewall since I
mistakenly thought that with bidi I wouldn't need to keep it open. I'll
open the port, and see what that does.
Someone wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable.
Ignore this message, it is a dupe.
. wrote:
I've noticed that the stable build does not open as many connections at
the unstable build. When I start the stable build, it will make 3 or 4
connections at first and then just sit there. Slowly it will build more
connections. When I launch the
Hi everyone,
it's been a while since I used freenet, but I decided to install it again.
However, I'm experiencing a problem now: after installing the latest
(stable) build and attempting to start up the node, Freenet reports an
error, and I get the following messages in my logfile:
22.11.2003
19 matches
Mail list logo
